Search/The vulnerabilities AI finds are the ones attackers want
● Story

The vulnerabilities AI finds are the ones attackers want

The vulnerabilities AI finds are the ones attackers want Attackers exploited a flaw found by an AI research agent within four days of its public disclosure, and they are exploiting more vulnerabilities overall, according to new research by Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG). The researchers examined vulnerability disclosure and exploitation data from January 2025 to August 2026. Disclosures doubled, exploitation stays rare Monthly CVE disclosures doubled in 2026, from 5,045 in January to 10,740 in August. Only 0.23% of the vulnerabilities disclosed this year, or about one in 431, were observed exploited in the wild. GTIG recorded 141 exploited vulnerabilities between January and August 2026, more than the 127 exploited in all of 2025. Zero-day exploitation grew from an average of 8…

CVEs
5
Highest CVSS
9.8
In KEV
4
Sources
3
Key vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-1731CVSS 9.8● KEV

BeyondTrust Remote Support (RS) and certain older versions of Privileged Remote Access (PRA) contain a critical pre-authentication remote code execution vulnerability. By sending specially crafted requests, an unauthenticated remote attacker may be able to execute operating system commands in the context of the site user.

CVE-2025-3248CVSS 9.8● KEV

Langflow versions prior to 1.3.0 are susceptible to code injection in the /api/v1/validate/code endpoint. A remote and unauthenticated attacker can send crafted HTTP requests to execute arbitrary code.

CVE-2026-42271CVSS 8.8● KEV

LiteLLM is a proxy server (AI Gateway) to call LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format. From version 1.74.2 to before version 1.83.7, two endpoints used to preview an MCP server before saving it — POST /mcp-rest/test/connection and POST /mcp-rest/test/tools/list — accepted a full server configuration in the request body, including the command, args, and env fields used by the stdio transport. When called with a stdio configuration, the endpoints attempted to connect, which spawned the supplied command as a subprocess on the proxy host with the privileges of the proxy process. The endpoints were gated only by a valid proxy API key, with no role check. Any authenticated user — including holders…

CVE-2026-5027CVSS 8.8

The 'POST /api/v2/files' endpoint does not sanitize the 'filename' parameter from the multipart form data, allowing an attacker to write files to arbitrary locations on the filesystem using path traversal sequences ('../').

CVE-2026-48710CVSS 6.5● KEV

Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit. Prior to version 1.0.1, the HTTP Host request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct request.url. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while request.url is rebuilt from the Host header, a malformed header could make request.url.path differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on request.url (rather than the raw scope path) could therefore be bypassed. Users should upgrade to a version greater than or equal to version 1.0.1, which validates the Host header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing…

Connections
17 relationships
The vulnerabilities AI finds are the ones attackers want
The vulnerabilities AI finds are the ones attackers want Attackers exploited a flaw found by an AI research agent within four days of its public disclosure, and they are exploiting more vulnerabilities overall, according to new research by Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG). The researchers examined vulnerability disclosure and exploitation data from January 2025 to August 2026. Disclosures doubled, exploitation stays rare Monthly CVE disclosures doubled in 2026, from 5,045 in January to 10,740 in August. Only 0.23% of the vulnerabilities disclosed this year, or about one in 431, were observed exploited in the wild. GTIG recorded 141 exploited vulnerabilities between January and August 2026, more than the 127 exploited in all of 2025. Zero-day exploitation grew from an average of 8 per month in 2025 to 11 per month in 2026. The researchers suggest most of the growth in exploitation comes from n-days. “It is possible that threat actors are finding it more accessible or efficient to use LLMs and AI tools” to analyze patches, disclosure announcements and proof-of-concept code “to rapidly weaponize n-days,” they said. GTIG rates vulnerabilities with its own risk ratings, which differ from CVSS severity scores. Exploitation of vulnerabilities it rates High Risk went from 28 in 2025 to 75 in the first eight months of 2026. AI finds more serious flaws Half of the vulnerabilities GTIG identified as likely discovered by AI lead to remote code execution, compared to 26% of those found by other means. (Source: Google) AI-discovered vulnerabilities are also less likely to be low risk. Of these, 39% were rated Low Risk and 58% Medium Risk, while vulnerabilities found by other means were 69% Low Risk and 28% Medium Risk. The researchers say this “largely likely reflects how research programs scope and deploy these systems,” since those programs task AI agents with auditing infrastructure and sensitive privilege boundaries. GTIG notes that public data undercounts AI-discovered vulnerabilities. CVE records have no standard tag for AI attribution, and cloud and SaaS providers often fix AI-found flaws in production without requesting CVE IDs. Attackers moved fast on an AI-found flaw CVE-2026-1731, an unauthenticated OS command injection vulnerability in BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and Remote Support, was discovered by the Hacktron AI research agent. Threat actors used it in targeted initial-access campaigns. GTIG saw one threat cluster exploit it within four days of public disclosure, and five more within seven days. The attackers escalated privileges, exfiltrated data and dropped payloads including SNOWLIGHT, SPARKRAT and cryptominers. “Defensive AI agents are uncovering high-impact vulnerabilities that threat actors actively seek to exploit,” the researchers noted. AI orchestration tools are the top target GTIG tracked 2,076 vulnerabilities in AI-related software between January 2025 and August 2026, over 1,500 of them disclosed in 2026. Half of this year’s disclosures affect agent orchestration frameworks such as Flowise and Langflow, where attackers exploit code execution nodes “via prompt injection or crafted workflow JSONs,” the researchers explained. Inference and serving software such as vLLM, Ollama and LiteLLM had 212 vulnerabilities disclosed in 2026. Nearly a quarter of them stem from unauthenticated API endpoints or server-side request forgery, which can let attackers bypass perimeter firewalls, use up GPU resources or extract model checkpoints. Compromised enterprise AI gateways can expose third-party API keys and “private prompt streams containing personally identifiable information (PII) or proprietary source code,” GTIG warned. Only a handful of AI-related vulnerabilities have been confirmed as exploited in the wild. They include a command injection flaw in LiteLLM (CVE-2026-42271) that leads to host takeover and API credential theft, and two Langflow flaws (CVE-2026-5027 and CVE-2025-3248) that let attackers write files to the host or run code remotely. GTIG expects vulnerability discovery and exploitation to keep rising in the short to medium term. “To counter the increased risk from rapid vulnerability discovery and exploitation, organizations must transition from unprioritized mass-patching to threat-intelligence-driven triage, combining targeted edge-defense with automated, agentic remediation,” reseachers concluded.
helpnetsecurity.comOct 1, 2026extracted
Related Stories
3
AI-Found Vulnerabilities More Likely to Enable RCE, Google Says
Google: Vulnerability disclosures double to 10,000 per month as AI fuels exploitation Vulnerability disclosures doubled between January and August, reaching a new peak of 10,740 last month, Google’s Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) said Wednesday. Total vulnerability disclosures began the year at 5,045 in January and had jumped to more than 10,000 for July and August. “We found that AI is measurably changing not just the pace of vulnerability discovery and exploitation, but also the types and typical risk profiles of vulnerabilities that are being discovered,” the researchers said. They noted that beyond the overall number of bugs being found, the number of distinct vulnerabilities disclosed and exploited during the eight month period surpassed the totals for all of 2025. There have already been 141 exploited vulnerabilities this year after 127 last year. In a report on Wednesday, GTIG said the increase in vulnerability exploitation in 2026 “is driven by the rapid, targeted weaponization of high-risk exploits in the wild rather than a flood of new zero-days.” Zero-days are vulnerabilities that are exploited before they are known to vendors and n-days are vulnerabilities that have been patched and publicly disclosed. The researchers found that hackers are getting better at using artificial intelligence to scan patches and exploit critical bugs. Kelli Vanderlee, senior analyst at GTIG, said they expect that AI-assisted vulnerability discovery and exploitation will continue to grow in the short-to medium-term. “It is possible that threat actors are finding it more accessible or efficient to use LLMs and AI tools to automate analysis of differences between product versions, patches, vulnerability disclosure announcements, and Proof-of-Concept (POC) code to rapidly weaponize n-days, rather than to discover new zero-days,” the researchers said. As an example, Google pointed to CVE-2026-1731 — a vulnerability in BeyondTrust software spotlighted by federal cyber defenders in February. The bug was found autonomously by a third-party research agent Hacktron AI. After it was disclosed, Google’s researchers said it saw threat actors “weaponize this vulnerability in targeted initial-access campaigns to bypass enterprise perimeters.” “More specifically, within four days of public disclosure, GTIG observed a threat cluster exploiting this vulnerability, followed by five additional threat clusters within seven days of public disclosure,” they said. “GTIG observed these threat actors collectively conduct a variety of post-exploitation activities, including privilege escalation, data exfiltration, and dropping secondary payloads including SNOWLIGHT, SPARKRAT, and cryptominers.” The case illustrated that when directed at critical attack surfaces, autonomous research agents “demonstrate a formidable capacity to uncover high-severity flaws.” AI agents are being used mostly to find medium and high-risk vulnerabilities. Vanderlee said they classify a bug as high-risk if exploitation would enable attackers to have a notable, direct impact to the security of targeted devices and networks without needing to overcome any major mitigating factors. “Reliability of exploitation is expected to be high and can typically be done on a wide scale," she added. The researchers said many of the disclosures this year have come from a handful of vendors, including router firmware company Totolink and Oracle. Threat actors continue to focus exploitation activity on perimeter appliances and exposed enterprise services, with 14% of vulnerabilities exploited between January and August affecting edge and security appliances. The report mirrors findings released last week by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) that more than 67,000 new CVEs have been published in 2026. Experts project a total of 96,000 new CVEs by the end of the year. The National Institute of Standards and Technology’s National Vulnerability Database program reported a 263% increase in annual CVE submissions between 2020 and 2025, with submissions in the first three months of 2026 one-third higher than during the same period in 2025, CISA said. Jonathan Greig is a Breaking News Reporter at Recorded Future News. Jonathan has worked across the globe as a journalist since 2014. Before moving back to New York City, he worked for news outlets in South Africa, Jordan and Cambodia. He previously covered cybersecurity at ZDNet and TechRepublic.
11 shared
Oct 1, 2026
WSO2 and Adobe Commerce Flaws Exploited in Attacks, Added to CISA KEV
The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on Friday added two security flaws impacting Microsoft SharePoint and Mikrotik RouterOS to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, citing evidence of active exploitation. The vulnerabilities in question are as follows - CVE-2026-65660 (CVSS score: 8.8) - A code injection vulnerability in Microsoft Office SharePoint that allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. CVE-2026-67279 (CVSS score: 6.9) - An improper enforcement of behavioral workflow vulnerability in Mikrotik RouterOS that could allow an unauthenticated client to open a session channel and send an exec request. As reported by The Hacker News earlier this week, CVE-2026-65660 was originally described by Microsoft as a spoofing vulnerability impacting SharePoint Server. The tech giant has since updated the advisory to state that it could be abused to obtain remote code execution. "As of 9/25/2026, Microsoft had reliable evidence of observed attacks against exploitation of this vulnerability," the Windows maker noted. Microsoft hasn't disclosed who was behind the exploitation efforts, when they started, how many organizations have been targeted, how many of them have been successful, and what attackers did once inside the vulnerable service. The second vulnerability to be added to the KEV catalog is CVE-2026-67279, which has been chained along with CVE-2026-86060, an argument injection flaw in the RouterOS login process, as part of an exploit codenamed MikroTrick. The exploit chain has been employed to take full administrative control of internet-exposed susceptible routers without the need for a password, per CERT Polska. "Combining the two vulnerabilities resulted in full unauthenticated access to the administrative console," the Polish cybersecurity agency said. "CVE-2026-67279 allowed an unauthenticated client to create a session channel, while CVE-2026-86060 allowed it to supply login with an attacker-controlled policy mask." In a separate analysis, Bishop Fox said it was able to reproduce the complete administrative takeover on vulnerable RouterOS 7.x builds. "MikroTrick combines two failures at different trust boundaries," security researcher Emilio Gallegos said. "The first allows an unauthenticated connection to reach functionality that RouterOS should expose only after login. The second causes the login process to treat data from that connection as a trusted administrative identity." "MikroTrick exposes a design risk in privileged software: a feature intended only for trusted local callers becomes a remote attack surface when an upstream component loses track of authentication state." It's worth noting that CISA added CVE-2026-86060 to its KEV catalog on September 11, 2026. Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies have time until September 28, 2026, to apply the necessary fixes.
6 shared
Oct 1, 2026
2026-013: Critical Vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP APM
History: 22/09/2026 --- v1.0 -- Initial publication Summary On 22 September 2026, F5 published an advisory addressing a critical vulnerability affecting its BIG-IP APM product. The vendor confirmed active exploitation in the wild [1]. CERT-EU recommends taking appropriate actions as soon as possible. Technical Details The vulnerability CVE-2026-94127, with a CVSS score of 9.8, is a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability and allow unauthenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution (RCE) on the affected device [1]. Affected Products The vulnerability affects the following versions of BIG-IP APM if configured with an access policy and an OAuth profile on a virtual server [1]: 17.1.0 - 17.1.3 17.5.0 - 17.5.1 21.1.0 Recommendations CERT-EU recommends taking the following actions as soon as possible: Preserve forensic evidence. Apply the relevant hotfix. Check for signs of compromise (see the compromise assessment section). If any sign of compromise is detected, start the incident response process. Mitigation If patching cannot be applied immediately, F5 provides an iRule-based mitigation for the affected virtual server. To obtain it, F5 BIG-IP clients should contact the F5 support [1]. Compromise Assessment CERT-EU strongly advises to look for the following indicators of compromise provided by the vendor in its advisory [1]: At a high level, multiple OAuth authentication failures, followed by suspicious commands, shortly followed by a TMM SIGABRT is the combination that should lead to human review of the system. OAuth authentication failures: check /var/log/apm for repeated occurrences of the following, especially 10 or more from a single IP in a short window. err tmm1\[30975\]: 01990004:3: : Request UserInfo from Source ID (null) IP failed. Error Code (invalid\_token) Error Description (The access token is invalid.) - Increase of OAuth failure statistics. Run the following and look for an unexplained increase in total_failed : $ tmctl global_oauth_stat -s total_requests,total_userinfo_requests,total_failed - Audit log anomalies: if OAuth failures are observed, review /var/log/audit around those timestamps for suspicious commands. TMM core files: Presence of a TMM core file alone is not an indicator, but core files should be investigated. The vendor indicates that they have observed TMM entering a loop, which causes the SOD daemon to send a SIGABRT.
5 shared
Sep 25, 2026