Search/AI-Found Vulnerabilities More Likely to Enable RCE, Google Says
● Story

AI-Found Vulnerabilities More Likely to Enable RCE, Google Says

Google: Vulnerability disclosures double to 10,000 per month as AI fuels exploitation Vulnerability disclosures doubled between January and August, reaching a new peak of 10,740 last month, Google’s Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) said Wednesday. Total vulnerability disclosures began the year at 5,045 in January and had jumped to more than 10,000 for July and August. “We found that AI is measurably changing not just the pace of vulnerability discovery and exploitation, but also the types and typical risk profiles of vulnerabilities that are being discovered,” the researchers said. They noted that beyond the overall number of bugs being found, the number of distinct vulnerabilities disclosed and exploited during the eight month period surpassed the totals for all of 2025. There have…

CVEs
4
Highest CVSS
9.8
In KEV
3
Sources
5
Key vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-1731CVSS 9.8● KEV

BeyondTrust Remote Support (RS) and certain older versions of Privileged Remote Access (PRA) contain a critical pre-authentication remote code execution vulnerability. By sending specially crafted requests, an unauthenticated remote attacker may be able to execute operating system commands in the context of the site user.

CVE-2025-3248CVSS 9.8● KEV

Langflow versions prior to 1.3.0 are susceptible to code injection in the /api/v1/validate/code endpoint. A remote and unauthenticated attacker can send crafted HTTP requests to execute arbitrary code.

CVE-2026-42271CVSS 8.8● KEV

LiteLLM is a proxy server (AI Gateway) to call LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format. From version 1.74.2 to before version 1.83.7, two endpoints used to preview an MCP server before saving it — POST /mcp-rest/test/connection and POST /mcp-rest/test/tools/list — accepted a full server configuration in the request body, including the command, args, and env fields used by the stdio transport. When called with a stdio configuration, the endpoints attempted to connect, which spawned the supplied command as a subprocess on the proxy host with the privileges of the proxy process. The endpoints were gated only by a valid proxy API key, with no role check. Any authenticated user — including holders…

CVE-2026-5027CVSS 8.8

The 'POST /api/v2/files' endpoint does not sanitize the 'filename' parameter from the multipart form data, allowing an attacker to write files to arbitrary locations on the filesystem using path traversal sequences ('../').

Connections
21 relationships
The vulnerabilities AI finds are the ones attackers want
The vulnerabilities AI finds are the ones attackers want Attackers exploited a flaw found by an AI research agent within four days of its public disclosure, and they are exploiting more vulnerabilities overall, according to new research by Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG). The researchers examined vulnerability disclosure and exploitation data from January 2025 to August 2026. Disclosures doubled, exploitation stays rare Monthly CVE disclosures doubled in 2026, from 5,045 in January to 10,740 in August. Only 0.23% of the vulnerabilities disclosed this year, or about one in 431, were observed exploited in the wild. GTIG recorded 141 exploited vulnerabilities between January and August 2026, more than the 127 exploited in all of 2025. Zero-day exploitation grew from an average of 8 per month in 2025 to 11 per month in 2026. The researchers suggest most of the growth in exploitation comes from n-days. “It is possible that threat actors are finding it more accessible or efficient to use LLMs and AI tools” to analyze patches, disclosure announcements and proof-of-concept code “to rapidly weaponize n-days,” they said. GTIG rates vulnerabilities with its own risk ratings, which differ from CVSS severity scores. Exploitation of vulnerabilities it rates High Risk went from 28 in 2025 to 75 in the first eight months of 2026. AI finds more serious flaws Half of the vulnerabilities GTIG identified as likely discovered by AI lead to remote code execution, compared to 26% of those found by other means. (Source: Google) AI-discovered vulnerabilities are also less likely to be low risk. Of these, 39% were rated Low Risk and 58% Medium Risk, while vulnerabilities found by other means were 69% Low Risk and 28% Medium Risk. The researchers say this “largely likely reflects how research programs scope and deploy these systems,” since those programs task AI agents with auditing infrastructure and sensitive privilege boundaries. GTIG notes that public data undercounts AI-discovered vulnerabilities. CVE records have no standard tag for AI attribution, and cloud and SaaS providers often fix AI-found flaws in production without requesting CVE IDs. Attackers moved fast on an AI-found flaw CVE-2026-1731, an unauthenticated OS command injection vulnerability in BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and Remote Support, was discovered by the Hacktron AI research agent. Threat actors used it in targeted initial-access campaigns. GTIG saw one threat cluster exploit it within four days of public disclosure, and five more within seven days. The attackers escalated privileges, exfiltrated data and dropped payloads including SNOWLIGHT, SPARKRAT and cryptominers. “Defensive AI agents are uncovering high-impact vulnerabilities that threat actors actively seek to exploit,” the researchers noted. AI orchestration tools are the top target GTIG tracked 2,076 vulnerabilities in AI-related software between January 2025 and August 2026, over 1,500 of them disclosed in 2026. Half of this year’s disclosures affect agent orchestration frameworks such as Flowise and Langflow, where attackers exploit code execution nodes “via prompt injection or crafted workflow JSONs,” the researchers explained. Inference and serving software such as vLLM, Ollama and LiteLLM had 212 vulnerabilities disclosed in 2026. Nearly a quarter of them stem from unauthenticated API endpoints or server-side request forgery, which can let attackers bypass perimeter firewalls, use up GPU resources or extract model checkpoints. Compromised enterprise AI gateways can expose third-party API keys and “private prompt streams containing personally identifiable information (PII) or proprietary source code,” GTIG warned. Only a handful of AI-related vulnerabilities have been confirmed as exploited in the wild. They include a command injection flaw in LiteLLM (CVE-2026-42271) that leads to host takeover and API credential theft, and two Langflow flaws (CVE-2026-5027 and CVE-2025-3248) that let attackers write files to the host or run code remotely. GTIG expects vulnerability discovery and exploitation to keep rising in the short to medium term. “To counter the increased risk from rapid vulnerability discovery and exploitation, organizations must transition from unprioritized mass-patching to threat-intelligence-driven triage, combining targeted edge-defense with automated, agentic remediation,” reseachers concluded.
helpnetsecurity.comOct 1, 2026extracted
Related Stories
4
The vulnerabilities AI finds are the ones attackers want
The vulnerabilities AI finds are the ones attackers want Attackers exploited a flaw found by an AI research agent within four days of its public disclosure, and they are exploiting more vulnerabilities overall, according to new research by Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG). The researchers examined vulnerability disclosure and exploitation data from January 2025 to August 2026. Disclosures doubled, exploitation stays rare Monthly CVE disclosures doubled in 2026, from 5,045 in January to 10,740 in August. Only 0.23% of the vulnerabilities disclosed this year, or about one in 431, were observed exploited in the wild. GTIG recorded 141 exploited vulnerabilities between January and August 2026, more than the 127 exploited in all of 2025. Zero-day exploitation grew from an average of 8 per month in 2025 to 11 per month in 2026. The researchers suggest most of the growth in exploitation comes from n-days. “It is possible that threat actors are finding it more accessible or efficient to use LLMs and AI tools” to analyze patches, disclosure announcements and proof-of-concept code “to rapidly weaponize n-days,” they said. GTIG rates vulnerabilities with its own risk ratings, which differ from CVSS severity scores. Exploitation of vulnerabilities it rates High Risk went from 28 in 2025 to 75 in the first eight months of 2026. AI finds more serious flaws Half of the vulnerabilities GTIG identified as likely discovered by AI lead to remote code execution, compared to 26% of those found by other means. (Source: Google) AI-discovered vulnerabilities are also less likely to be low risk. Of these, 39% were rated Low Risk and 58% Medium Risk, while vulnerabilities found by other means were 69% Low Risk and 28% Medium Risk. The researchers say this “largely likely reflects how research programs scope and deploy these systems,” since those programs task AI agents with auditing infrastructure and sensitive privilege boundaries. GTIG notes that public data undercounts AI-discovered vulnerabilities. CVE records have no standard tag for AI attribution, and cloud and SaaS providers often fix AI-found flaws in production without requesting CVE IDs. Attackers moved fast on an AI-found flaw CVE-2026-1731, an unauthenticated OS command injection vulnerability in BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and Remote Support, was discovered by the Hacktron AI research agent. Threat actors used it in targeted initial-access campaigns. GTIG saw one threat cluster exploit it within four days of public disclosure, and five more within seven days. The attackers escalated privileges, exfiltrated data and dropped payloads including SNOWLIGHT, SPARKRAT and cryptominers. “Defensive AI agents are uncovering high-impact vulnerabilities that threat actors actively seek to exploit,” the researchers noted. AI orchestration tools are the top target GTIG tracked 2,076 vulnerabilities in AI-related software between January 2025 and August 2026, over 1,500 of them disclosed in 2026. Half of this year’s disclosures affect agent orchestration frameworks such as Flowise and Langflow, where attackers exploit code execution nodes “via prompt injection or crafted workflow JSONs,” the researchers explained. Inference and serving software such as vLLM, Ollama and LiteLLM had 212 vulnerabilities disclosed in 2026. Nearly a quarter of them stem from unauthenticated API endpoints or server-side request forgery, which can let attackers bypass perimeter firewalls, use up GPU resources or extract model checkpoints. Compromised enterprise AI gateways can expose third-party API keys and “private prompt streams containing personally identifiable information (PII) or proprietary source code,” GTIG warned. Only a handful of AI-related vulnerabilities have been confirmed as exploited in the wild. They include a command injection flaw in LiteLLM (CVE-2026-42271) that leads to host takeover and API credential theft, and two Langflow flaws (CVE-2026-5027 and CVE-2025-3248) that let attackers write files to the host or run code remotely. GTIG expects vulnerability discovery and exploitation to keep rising in the short to medium term. “To counter the increased risk from rapid vulnerability discovery and exploitation, organizations must transition from unprioritized mass-patching to threat-intelligence-driven triage, combining targeted edge-defense with automated, agentic remediation,” reseachers concluded.
11 shared
Oct 7, 2026
WSO2 and Adobe Commerce Flaws Exploited in Attacks, Added to CISA KEV
The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on Friday added two security flaws impacting Microsoft SharePoint and Mikrotik RouterOS to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, citing evidence of active exploitation. The vulnerabilities in question are as follows - CVE-2026-65660 (CVSS score: 8.8) - A code injection vulnerability in Microsoft Office SharePoint that allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. CVE-2026-67279 (CVSS score: 6.9) - An improper enforcement of behavioral workflow vulnerability in Mikrotik RouterOS that could allow an unauthenticated client to open a session channel and send an exec request. As reported by The Hacker News earlier this week, CVE-2026-65660 was originally described by Microsoft as a spoofing vulnerability impacting SharePoint Server. The tech giant has since updated the advisory to state that it could be abused to obtain remote code execution. "As of 9/25/2026, Microsoft had reliable evidence of observed attacks against exploitation of this vulnerability," the Windows maker noted. Microsoft hasn't disclosed who was behind the exploitation efforts, when they started, how many organizations have been targeted, how many of them have been successful, and what attackers did once inside the vulnerable service. The second vulnerability to be added to the KEV catalog is CVE-2026-67279, which has been chained along with CVE-2026-86060, an argument injection flaw in the RouterOS login process, as part of an exploit codenamed MikroTrick. The exploit chain has been employed to take full administrative control of internet-exposed susceptible routers without the need for a password, per CERT Polska. "Combining the two vulnerabilities resulted in full unauthenticated access to the administrative console," the Polish cybersecurity agency said. "CVE-2026-67279 allowed an unauthenticated client to create a session channel, while CVE-2026-86060 allowed it to supply login with an attacker-controlled policy mask." In a separate analysis, Bishop Fox said it was able to reproduce the complete administrative takeover on vulnerable RouterOS 7.x builds. "MikroTrick combines two failures at different trust boundaries," security researcher Emilio Gallegos said. "The first allows an unauthenticated connection to reach functionality that RouterOS should expose only after login. The second causes the login process to treat data from that connection as a trusted administrative identity." "MikroTrick exposes a design risk in privileged software: a feature intended only for trusted local callers becomes a remote attack surface when an upstream component loses track of authentication state." It's worth noting that CISA added CVE-2026-86060 to its KEV catalog on September 11, 2026. Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies have time until September 28, 2026, to apply the necessary fixes.
8 shared
Oct 1, 2026
Cisco warns of new SD-WAN zero-day exploited in attacks
Attackers are exploiting a new critical zero-day flaw in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, the system companies use to manage their Cisco SD-WAN networks, Cisco said in an advisory on September 30. The flaw, CVE-2026-76504, could allow a remote attacker with no login access to use the Manager's API as the admin user. Fixed releases are available, and there is no workaround. It carries a CVSS score of 9.8 out of 10. It sits in the part of the Manager's API that handles login sessions. The Manager mishandles URI encoding in an HTTP request. A crafted request can therefore bypass an authentication rule intended to restrict access to a single API endpoint. The attacker needs no credentials, only the ability to send that request to the Manager's API. Managers exposed to the internet are at risk of compromise, according to Cisco. By default, the admin user holds the netadmin role, which is allowed to perform all operations on the device. Cisco said its Product Security Incident Response Team "became aware of active exploitation of this vulnerability" in September 2026. The flaw was found while Cisco's Technical Assistance Center (TAC) was handling a support case. The advisory does not say how many customers were attacked, when the attacks began, who carried them out, or what the attackers did with the access. Who Needs to Upgrade The flaw affects SD-WAN Manager regardless of how the system is configured. No other product is listed as affected. These are the first fixed releases for each release train: CVE-2026-76504 is separate from three Cisco SD-WAN flaws fixed earlier: CVE-2026-20182 in May, and CVE-2026-20245 and CVE-2026-20262 in June. A comparison of the advisories shows that the fixed releases for those flaws are all older than the ones in the table above. So a Manager last upgraded for the May or June fixes still needs this update. The table does not list the 20.10, 20.11, 20.13, 20.14, or 20.16 release trains, which Cisco's May advisory did list. The advisory also does not name Cisco SD-WAN Cloud-Pro or Cisco SD-WAN for Government (FedRAMP), two deployment types named in the May and June advisories. Cisco SD-WAN Cloud (Cisco Managed) is already fixed in release 20.15.605, and customers on it need to take no action. Until an on-prem Manager is upgraded, Cisco advises restricting access to it from unsecured networks such as the internet. Where internet access is required, only known, trusted hosts should be allowed in, and the control components should sit behind a firewall. Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Cloud Hosted environments already have this mitigation in place. The mitigation worked in a test environment, according to Cisco, which advises customers to assess its impact on their own networks before applying it. Cisco's SD-WAN hardening guide says administrative interfaces, such as ports 443, 22 and 830, should not be exposed directly to the internet. HTTPS access to the Manager should come only from a jump host or a management subnet. Checking for Signs of Compromise The signs of compromise Cisco describes involve j_security_check, the request path the Manager uses for session-based logins. In Cisco's example, one character of that path is URI-encoded, giving /%6a_security_check, where %6a stands for the letter j. Two log files are the places to look for j_security_check entries from unknown or unauthorized IP addresses: File: /var/log/nms/containers/service-proxy/serviceproxy-access.log File: /var/log/nms/vmanage-server.log, in particular entries for users whose names start with viptela-reserved- Names starting with viptela-reserved- belong to reserved system service accounts. Any one character in the request can be encoded, so %6a is only an example. The same entries can also appear during normal operation, and each match has to be checked against normal activity to avoid false positives. To help determine whether a Manager has been compromised, customers can open a Severity 3 case with Cisco TAC and include CVE-2026-76504 in the title. Cisco asks them to run request admin-tech on the Manager first, so the output file can be reviewed. The advisory includes no detection rule and does not say whether upgrading removes an attacker who already has access. Cisco's advisories for the May flaw and the first June flaw said an update alone would not resolve a confirmed compromise. They told customers to collect the admin-tech file before upgrading. CVE-2026-76504 follows a series of Cisco SD-WAN flaws flagged as exploited this year. As of September 30, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency's (CISA) Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog listed eight Cisco SD-WAN flaws added in 2026.
6 shared
Oct 5, 2026
NetScaler zero-day exploitation escalates into mass attacks (CVE-2026-88771)
The public still doesn’t know who is abusing a critical Citrix vulnerability exploited as a zero-day weeks before disclosure, but we now know that the unknown digital intruders have used CVE-2026-88772 to break into government agencies, financial services firms, education organizations, and legal and professional services sectors across North America and Europe. And everyone agrees that the vendor took way too long to disclose the security holes. GreyNoise said it spotted an attempt to exploit CVE-2026-88771 against a Citrix NetScaler Gateway on September 24. Google researchers, meanwhile, said the CVE-2026-88772 campaign has been ongoing “since at least early September.” “Why Citrix took so long to disclose these vulnerabilities is a question only Citrix can answer,” Benjamin Harris, founder and CEO of exposure management firm watchTowr, told The Register. Citrix declined to answer The Register's questions about the scope of the attacks, and why it didn't alert the public about the CVEs under active exploitation until Sunday. “The vulnerabilities were discovered during incident response and forensic investigations at organizations already compromised, meaning both the exploitation and Citrix’s awareness of it predated public disclosure,” Harris said. “Citrix has a history of delaying the publication of vulnerabilities, even when they’re being exploited in the wild and affecting customers.” So if you use Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway appliances, and haven’t already applied the security updates, do that ASAP. But first, check your systems for signs of compromise, warns Mandiant Consulting CTO Charles Carmakal. “Given the active exploitation, NetScaler customers should prioritize examining their systems for compromise *before* upgrading/patching,” Carmakal said on LinkedIn. “If you find evidence of web shells or other malicious files, please preserve evidence and investigate the scope of the compromise. Patching alone may not eradicate the threat actor from your environment.” No attribution - yet Citrix disclosed eight CVEs on Sunday with the worst of the bunch – CVE-2026-88771 and CVE-2026-88772 – earning critical 9.5 CVSS scores. “Exploitation of CVE-2026-88771 and CVE-2026-88772 on unmitigated NetScaler deployments has been observed,” the vendor said. CVE-2026-88771 can allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands remotely. CVE-2026-88772 is a memory overflow vulnerability that can lead to remote code execution or denial of service when DTLS is enabled, as it is by default on VPN virtual servers. But by the time Citrix issued security advisories and warned customers about the vulnerabilities, they were already under attack. “No attribution has been made public, and we have yet to identify a clear trend among targets by industry or organization size,” Harris said. “Historically, NetScaler vulnerabilities have been exploited by both state-sponsored groups and ransomware operators.” WatchTowr on Tuesday published a technical writeup about CVE-2026-88772, plus a detection artifact generator for Citrix users to determine if they are vulnerable and to help with remediation. Also on Tuesday, Google’s threat intel businesses provided additional details about the exploitation campaign’s targets and the attacker’s custom malware. “We have observed evidence that organizations in North America and Europe in the government, financial services, education, legal and professional services sectors were likely impacted by this exploitation campaign, which has been ongoing since at least early September,” Google Threat Intelligence Group and Mandiant said in an advisory. Custom malware After analyzing the intruder’s post-exploit toolkit, the malware hunters found never-before-seen malware used to establish persistent root access and proxy traffic into internal corporate networks. The custom malware includes WHIPSHOT, a PHP web shell, and SLAPSHOT, a TCP tunneling tool written in Python. WHIPSHOT is disguised as a Debian package and hides Base64-encoded command-and-control payloads in native HTTP headers. It functions as an HTTP transport bridge for SLAPSHOT, which accepts commands from WHIPSHOT and forwards arbitrary TCP streams to internal hosts. Supported commands include: open, which establishes an outbound TCP socket to a target host and port. push, which writes data to an open session. pull, which polls and reads data from an open session socket. exch, which sends and receives command-and-control data to and from an open session socket. close, which terminates a specified network session. ping, which performs a basic health-check verification. “In at least one observed intrusion, the threat actor routed traffic through this proxy to manually conduct internal reconnaissance and credential theft,” the threat intel teams noted. Google did not immediately respond to The Register’s questions about the campaign, including how many exploitation attempts and successful intrusions its threat hunters observed. Its advisory notes that the Citrix campaign “underscores the continued targeting of edge devices to gain initial access to victim networks, a trend that GTIG has tracked across a range of threat actors.” Security and networking vulnerabilities accounted for about half of enterprise-related zero-days in 2025, according to Google’s count. Attackers love edge devices - application delivery controllers, VPN gateways, and firewalls - because they provide direct access from the open internet to corporate networks, allowing attackers to bypass endpoint detection tools and other security layers. NetScaler, in particular, is notoriously buggy. Attackers exploited another critical NetScaler vuln in March. A year earlier, Citrix disclosed multiple zero-days in the same product. ®
6 shared
Oct 5, 2026