Search/t-mobile
● Vendor

t-mobile

Known CVEs
0
Highest CVSS
—
In KEV
0
Vendor
tm-ac1900
Connections
24 relationships
Gemini usato per creare truffe online, Google fa causa a al gruppo di criminale cinese “Outsider Enterprise”
Il gruppo Outsider Enterprise avrebbe sfruttato l’AI di Google per produrre siti falsi, messaggi fraudolenti e campagne di phishing contro centinaia di migliaia di americani. Coinvolti anche FBI, AT&T, T-Mobile e Verizon. Google ha fatto causa a una rete cybercriminale cinese accusata di aver usato Gemini per alimentare campagne di truffe finanziarie online contro centinaia di migliaia di cittadini americani. Secondo quanto riporta il New York Times, il gruppo, noto come Outsider Enterprise, avrebbe utilizzato l’AI di Google per creare centinaia di siti falsi che imitavano aziende come Google e YouTube, ma anche servizi pubblici e governativi, tra cui il Postal Service americano e il sistema E-ZPass di New York per il pagamento dei pedaggi autostradali. La collaborazione con FBI e operatori telefonici La causa è stata depositata presso il tribunale federale del Distretto Sud di New York. Google accusa la rete cinese di aver utilizzato in modo fraudolento la sua tecnologia e il suo marchio, chiedendo al giudice un ordine restrittivo per consentire alla società e alle autorità di bloccare l’infrastruttura della rete. Per la prima volta, Google ha dichiarato di coordinarsi con l’FBI e con operatori wireless come AT&T, T-Mobile e Verizon per smantellare la rete. L’obiettivo è bloccare siti, messaggi, domini e strumenti usati per colpire gli utenti. Secondo la società, centinaia di migliaia di persone sarebbero state colpite, in larghissima parte negli Stati Uniti. Google non ha indicato con precisione l’ammontare dei danni, ma parla di perdite nell’ordine di milioni di dollari. Come funzionava la rete Secondo la denuncia, Outsider Enterprise avrebbe coordinato le attività attraverso Telegram, dove i membri del gruppo si scambiavano consigli, strumenti e kit software per produrre truffe su larga scala. L’uso dell’intelligenza artificiale avrebbe reso più veloce e più semplice la produzione di siti falsi e messaggi fraudolenti. Google sostiene che il gruppo abbia creato 131 kit software capaci di generare migliaia di pagine web contraffatte. In sole due settimane di maggio, la rete avrebbe inviato 2,5 milioni di messaggi a utenti Android, contenenti link verso 9mila siti falsi. Google ha inoltre collegato al gruppo oltre un milione di indirizzi internet fraudolenti. Il ruolo dell’AI nelle truffe Il caso mostra come l’intelligenza artificiale stia cambiando anche il cybercrime. Secondo Google e le autorità americane, le truffe potenziate dall’AI stanno crescendo più rapidamente rispetto ad altre forme di phishing e frode online. L’AI consente ai criminali di creare testi più credibili, siti più realistici, campagne più personalizzate e infrastrutture fraudolente su scala molto più ampia. Il risultato è un phishing meno riconoscibile e più difficile da intercettare per gli utenti. “Gli attori criminali usano sempre più l’AI per rendere frodi come questa più convincenti e più difficili da rilevare”, ha dichiarato Brett Leatherman, assistant director della Cyber Division dell’FBI. Perdite miliardarie Secondo i recenti dati dell’FBI, lo scorso anno i cybercriminali hanno sottratto agli americani quasi 21 miliardi di dollari. Di questi, circa 893 milioni di dollari sarebbero collegati a truffe che hanno coinvolto l’uso dell’intelligenza artificiale. Il dato spiega perché Google stia cercando di intervenire prima che il fenomeno aumenti ulteriormente. La società ha avvertito che l’AI ha potenziato il problema delle truffe online e che il rischio è una crescita rapida delle frodi basate su Gemini e altri strumenti generativi.
cybersecitalia.itJun 15, 2026extracted
T-Mobile Sets the Record Straight on Latest Data Breach Filing
T-Mobile USA has provided clarification on a recent data breach notification, stating that it was triggered by an insider incident with a very limited impact. A notice submitted to the Maine Attorney General’s Office this week informs its recipient that T-Mobile recently detected unauthorized access to limited information from their T-Mobile account. Exposed information included full name, email address, physical address, account number and associated phone number, T-Mobile account PIN, date of birth, driver’s license number, and SSN. The company said personal financial account information and call records were not impacted, and the affected user’s T-Mobile account PIN has been reset as a precaution. The data breach notification sent to the Maine AGO indicates that only ‘1’ individual was impacted, but companies occasionally use ‘1’ as a placeholder when the total number of affected individuals has yet to be determined. In addition, the description in the notice may be interpreted as a mass credential-stuffing attack targeting T-Mobile accounts. In credential-stuffing attacks, threat actors use credentials compromised in other breaches to target accounts protected by the same username-password combination. However, T-Mobile told SecurityWeek that indeed only one account was impacted by the incident. “We identified an isolated incident involving a single vendor employee who improperly accessed information related to a customer. No credentials were compromised,” a T-Mobile spokesperson said. “We have notified relevant authorities in accordance with applicable reporting requirements. We have also notified law enforcement and contacted the affected customer directly,” the spokesperson added. T-Mobile disclosed several significant data breaches in the past years, including one affecting 37 million accounts. Related: Toy Giant Hasbro Hit by Cyberattack Related: Lloyds Data Security Incident Impacts 450,000 Individuals Related: 250,000 Affected by Data Breach at Nacogdoches Memorial Hospital
securityweek.comApr 3, 2026extracted
CISO Conversations: Timothy Youngblood; 4x Fortune 500 CISO/CSO
Timothy Youngblood didn’t set out to be a CISO, but he became CISO at four major enterprises, took on angel investing and won the Most Valued Member award at the Summer Investor Capital Expo of the world’s largest angel group last summer. The path to security leadership Some rivers rush headlong to their destination, others meander slowly without seeming to recognize where they will inevitably end. Tim Youngblood is that latter type. Why and how did he choose a career in cybersecurity? “I think it chose me,” he says. “I came from a single family home in Atlanta. We didn’t have much money, but I had a friend – I called him my rich friend – whose father bought an IBM PC when I was 10 years old. I’d go over, and we played with it. Every day. I loved it. Until his mother said, ‘Hey, I didn’t adopt you’; and it had to stop.” But he’d been bitten by the computer bug (in both senses – slowly evolving pun intended). “There was a strip mall close by that I could cycle to. It had department stores with computers on display. They had demo modes, and I taught myself how to program, until they also got tired of me and kicked me out. But I found a Radio Shack, and that a different ball game. The store manager was kind to me. I honed my knowledge and love of computers at Radio Shack; and I went on to graduate from college with a degree in Computer Information Systems.” He left college as a programmer and transitioned from development into Local Area Network (LAN) and Wide Area Network (WAN) deployments – but with no clear intent on cybersecurity (which hardly existed as a profession). It wasn’t until he later joined KPMG and started doing audits that he had any formal training in security related issues. “KPMG also did formal security risk assessments. We did penetration testing, and that’s where I got my first formal training around cybersecurity.” He got his big break when he joined Dell. It was in the early days of Sarbanes-Oxley and Dell had a failure in every computer. ‘We had to train the executive teams. They couldn’t just pull policies off the internet and say they were doing those things – that was never going to work. So, we uplifted the control structure, and eventually the whole process rolled into me becoming Dell’s first CISO in 2010. Youngblood arrived in cybersecurity leadership with a love of computers but no clear intent to work in cybersecurity. But from there, his cybersecurity career took off – cybersecurity had chosen him. After KPMG, he spent two years as a director at Jefferson Wells (part of the Experis group) before working in compliance, policy and risk at Dell (and later becoming CISO). After Dell, he became CISO at Kimberley-Clark, then corporate VP and CISO at McDonald’s, then SVP, CSO & product security officer at T-Mobile, became an advisory board member with various organizations and an angel investor with the Keiretsu Forum, and adjunct professor at the University of Oklahoma in 2025.. CISO churn CISOs famously have a high churn rate – it shows in his own career path. There are many reasons. A decade ago, the CISO would be held accountable for breaches. If the breach was serious, CISOs would be fired or be expected to fall on their own sword. This is less common today, but the churn remains high. Why? Youngblood provides valuable albeit personal insight. “Restlessness, I guess,” he suggested. “I like to take on a challenge and do something that hasn’t been done before. That’s what excites me.” The current crop of senior security leaders comprises, almost by definition, ‘pioneers’ – the profession didn’t exist before they essentially created it. When he joined Dell, he hadn’t been looking for a ‘CISO’ role; but he relished the challenge he had accepted. “I was doing things that had never been done at Dell – establishing the global compliance organization, and the company’s first risk management office.” He hadn’t sought a CISO role (Dell didn’t have a CISO position), but the work he did eventually created the role, and he moved on to fill it. It’s worth noting that he has an entrepreneurial spirit – something not uncommon in the more dynamic and successful CISOs. When he was young – remember he didn’t come from a wealthy background – he and friends found a load of books in a dumpster. They loaded them into a red wagon and went round the neighborhood selling them door-to-door. This natural inclination to make more from what is initially apparent has never left him. Early in his professional career, while still at KPMG, he studied for and gained his second degree – a master’s in technology commercialization from the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas at Austin. McCombs describes the course as a ‘program for entrepreneurs’. There’s a strong element of, ‘Been there, done that, what’s next: and what can I make of it?’ In Youngblood’s personal version of CISO churn. Angel investor This combination of seeking new challenges while making something new drew Youngblood, inevitably, toward angel investing. It didn’t happen overnight. It barely existed when he first became involved in new ideas and venture capitalism. It grew out of an inherent interest in new ideas and startup firms. “In each organization I worked for, I started a process to help bring in new ideas and innovation into the program. Eventually I called it PIE – portfolio innovation enablement. I would have five or six startups come and pitch to me and my leadership team. It wasn’t just for security. I’d bring in the CIO’s office, and privacy, audit and legal. So, each year I’d hear 40 to 50 pitches from startups. It was a way of fast tracking the lobbying process for new firms trying to get into big companies, and each year, two or three would end up in our portfolio.” But he didn’t just sit in his office waiting for the new firms to come knocking. He started traveling to Israel some ten years ago, which was developing its reputation for new and innovative ideas (see From IDF to Inc: The Israeli Cybersecurity Startup Conveyor Belt). And he met with VC firms. The confluence of these various elements (need to face new challenges, adventurous spirit, entrepreneurial attitude, deep understanding of cybersecurity, and awareness of the startup engine room) had the inevitable result. “When I finished my last operational job at T Mobile, I thought to myself, ‘Hey, I’ve done everything I want to do as a CISO. What’s something new that I’m good at?’ Well, I’ve been picking winners and losers for decades now, and working with VC groups. So, why can’t I enjoy the benefits of this financially by being an angel investor?” Angel investing by CISOs was in its infancy. Silicon Valley CISO investments (SVCI, a group comprising more than 60 CISOs) was founded in 2019 with the mission ‘of fueling the next generation of cybersecurity innovation’. This is not surprising. In general, although not in total, today’s top CISOs entered a new and dynamic industry in its early days Like Youngblood, an adventurous and entrepreneurial element is common. It is still a dynamic and rapidly growing industry, and top CISOs can be very well recompensed. IANS 2025 ’state of the CISO report’ notes that large organizations pay CISOs that combine security and IT responsibility “an average annual pay of $1 million [with] the top quartile starting at $1.5 million”. This by no means applies to all CISOs, but it is indicative of a well-paid profession. The combination of good pay, an entrepreneurial bent, and a detailed knowledge of cybersecurity and its needs, makes something like the angel investor SVCI inevitable. Youngblood’s career path has always been slightly non-standard. He didn’t simply join an angel group dedicated to cybersecurity, but instead chose to also join the Keiretsu Forum, a global angel network founded in 2000 by Randy Williams – and often described as the world’s largest angel group. Worldwide, it has more than 4000 members in 60 chapters. Membership is by invitation only, but he had built a solid relationship with many VC firms. Like SVCI, Keiretsu focuses on startups with high growth potential; but unlike SVCI this is not limited to cybersecurity firms. “I started by focusing, naturally, on cybersecurity. I’ve got plenty of deal flow coming from VC groups I had worked with while a CISO – they allow me to assess companies that they are assessing for their portfolio, and I get opportunities to invest in them as well. I’ve expanded that and joined several angel groups. I’m part of the world’s largest angel group, which is the Keiretsu Forum. And through them and a few others, I look at medical devices, clean tech, media companies – and I just made my first consumer product investment earlier this year. Now I’m fully swung into the angel investing world and have looked at the multiple aspects of what grows a good business and what a good team looks like.” CISO in residence Youngblood’s role as an angel investor brings us neatly to his most recent CISO position, as a CISO in residence. ‘In residence’ CISOs are another recent evolution in CISO roles, often linked to venture capital and provided by the VC firm to deliver an advisory rather than deep hands-on security role. Here the request came from the company rather than a VC organization – but the preamble was still investment. “I’d been looking at the problem of non-human identities, which had been a significant issue at every company I had worked at.” It’s a problem that just keeps growing with business transformation, SaaS, and now agentic AI. “I was looking for someone trying to solve this. I talked with several founders of startups, most of them still in stealth. Then I got connected with a firm that had been focused on NHIs since being founded in 2021. I was really attracted by that, and I was ready to make an investment. But the CEO said, ‘Hey, I’d like to work with you in a different way.” They discussed how that different way would work and settled on the idea of CISO in residence – a tenured senior level executive that guides the company in the right direction; and it was a position he took. “I’m guiding the product team on how to align the product with the needs of large enterprises, working with the marketing team on the company messaging, supporting and guiding the platform strategy, and connecting all the dots with the salespeople.” He used the emergence of AI as an example of this role. “We were focusing on and discussing the next layer of AI. Back in the Fall of 2024 I started talking to the firm about AI agents, and now they’re the biggest buzz in cyber. Well, all AI agents work off NHIs, so it was important we could handle the NHIs of agentic AI as soon as possible. I discussed this with the VP of product, he agreed, and now it’s in the product. That’s the kind of thing that a CISO in residence does.” It’s recognizing opportunities, necessities and improvements, and then helping the company do the right thing in the right way to have the best effect ahead of the competition. Related: CISO Conversations: Maarten Van Horenbeeck, SVP & Chief Security Officer at Adobe Related: CISO Conversations: Jaya Baloo From Rapid7 and Jonathan Trull From Qualys Related: CISO Conversations: LinkedIn’s Geoff Belknap and Meta’s Guy Rosen Related: CISO Conversations: Nick McKenzie (Bugcrowd) and Chris Evans (HackerOne)
securityweek.comFeb 24, 2026extracted
2025: The Untold Stories of Check Point Research
Check Point Research (CPR) continuously tracks threats, following the clues that lead to major players and incidents in the threat landscape. Whether it’s high-end financially-motivated campaigns or state-sponsored activity, our focus is to figure out what the threat is, report our findings to the relevant parties, and make sure Check Point customers stay protected. Some of our work naturally makes it into the spotlight through public reports and deep blog posts. However, a large portion of what we uncover remains in the shadows but is used on a day-to-day basis to improve protections, connect the dots between incidents, and keep a watchful eye on known threat actors and infrastructure. In 2025, the activity varied by region and objective. In the Americas, attackers invested in high-value targets, including early ToolShell exploitation assessed as Chinese-nexus activity against North American government organizations. Identity-centric intrusion methods were also prominent, such as AiTM-enabled credential theft in targeted campaigns against researchers within US think tanks. In Europe, the year combined disruption, espionage, influence operations, and financially motivated intrusions. Russian-affiliated activity drove pressure in Eastern Europe and Ukraine, while Chinese and Iranian-nexus actors remained active, and election-related influence efforts persisted, including renewed targeting around Moldova’s parliamentary cycle. Across Asia Pacific and Central Asia, Chinese-nexus espionage was sustained, frequently relying on updated versions of established attack playbooks. In the Middle East and Africa, campaigns reflected a diversified mix of state-aligned operations, destructive activity, and PSOA-linked exploitation, with conflict periods amplifying targeted collection such as attempts to compromise internet-connected cameras. Across these threats, novelty more often came from how familiar techniques were combined than from entirely new tooling. Actors repeatedly used trusted platforms and common enterprise pathways: cloud hosting for command and control, remote administration tooling, DLL side-loading chains, and social engineering patterns such as ClickFix, to reduce detection and improve reliability. Overall, 2025 reinforced the need for durable visibility across identity, cloud, and endpoints, faster closure of exposed and unpatched entry points, and industry collaboration. Check Point Research Untold Stories Timeline – 2025 Key APT campaigns, cyberattacks & threat actor activity tracked throughout the year Jan APT36 Targeting Indian Aerospace Industry RedCurl Weaponized LNK Files Campaign Mar Stealth Falcon Exploits WebDAV 0-day in the Middle East and Africa Apr Samsung Security Release Fixes 0-day Lying Pigeon Campaign Targeting the Moldovan Elections May Flax Typhoon Targets IT Supply Chains in Taiwan GoldenSMTP Targeting Governments in Central Asia Jun Cameras Targeting by Iranian-Nexus Actors Handala Hack Wiper Muddy Water Activity in Israeli Municipality Jul ToolShell Intrusion SilverFox Attacks Web Servers Kimsuky Phishing Campaigns against the US Think Tanks YoroTrooper Targets Eurasian Economic Union Countries Aug Camaro Dragon Targeting Government Sector UAC-0050 Phishing Campaign Zipline Shifting to Europe WIRTE Espionage and Sabotage Sep WhiteLock Ransomware Oct COLDRIVER in Southeast Europe Dec Nimbus Manticore Activity in Africa Figure 1 – Overview of CPR Untold Stories 2025. Americas Throughout the year, the Americas were a focal point for both nation state activity and high-end cybercrime, with a wide mix of actors targeting government and private-sector organizations alike. The state-sponsored groups in particular seem to reserve some of their most innovative tradecraft for targets in the Americas. Whether through zero-day exploitation, abuse of cloud services, or highly refined phishing operations, attackers appear willing to invest more time and sophisticated efforts for targets in this region. ToolShell Exploitation Used as a Zero-day by Chinese-nexus Actors ToolShell is an exploit chain targeting on-premises Microsoft SharePoint and enables unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) on vulnerable servers. It works by abusing weaknesses in how SharePoint handles certain web service / API requests, which allow attackers to reach code execution without needing valid credentials. ToolShell’s involvement in active exploitation efforts has been observed globally. While analyzing in July the broader wave of ToolShell activity, we found a subset of targeted incidents where the exploit chain appears to have been used as a zero-day, before the original patch was available. In each of these limited early exploitation attempts, the targets were government-sector organizations in North America. We attribute the zero-day exploitation activity to Chinese-nexus threat actors. This assessment is based on the supporting infrastructure we observed in this campaign, which includes router-based relay nodes consistent with Operation Relay Box (ORB)-style networks, an approach most frequently seen in intrusions attributed by multiple vendors to Chinese nexus groups. This assessment aligns with Microsoft Threat Intelligence report that Chinese APTs exploited the vulnerability as a zero-day. Figure 2 – ToolShell Exploitation Timeline. Kimsuky Targeting Think-Tanks in the US Since mid-July, we’ve been tracking a targeted phishing campaign aimed at researchers within US think tanks which focus on North Korean affairs and policy. The campaign relies on spear-phishing emails, often impersonating peers from European universities or NGOs, with invitations to collaborate or participate in academic or policy events. The malicious emails contain either a link or a PDF attachment embedding a QR code, both of which lead to web pages impersonating legitimate organizations. Figure 4 – Example of a phishing landing page (hosted at signup-forms[.]theonlycompany[.]com), explaining the login request. The landing pages claim a login is required and include a button that redirects victims to credential-harvesting sites tailored to their email providers, such as Yahoo, Gmail, or Microsoft. The phishing infrastructure leverages Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) kits to bypass MFA and gain unauthorized access to victims’ email accounts. RedCurl Weaponizes LNK files RedCurl is a sophisticated, Russian-speaking threat actor historically tied to corporate espionage, and most recently, to ransomware operations. The actor has targeted North American entities for years. In more recent activity affecting North America and Asia, we observed a new multi-stage infection chain that pulls a remote resource by abusing the Working Directory parameter in LNK files. The LNKs point to a legitimate Windows binary (such as conhost or rundll32), and pass an argument that references a file located in that remote working directory production[.]dav[.]indeedex[.]workers[.]dev. This combination of living-off-the-land execution, using WebDAV and remote resource loading, appears to contribute to exceptionally low detection rates. While we haven’t observed clear post-exploitation activity in our data, we did see indications suggesting the intrusion path may ultimately lead to the deployment of RedCurl’s custom ransomware. Europe The activity we observed in Europe ranges from operations designed to disrupt, to those intended to influence and mislead, to financially motivated campaigns. Together, these threats threaten every pillar of data security: confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The most aggressive activity is driven by Russian-affiliated actors, especially in Eastern Europe and Ukraine, where they employ a mixture of tactics consistent with aims of espionage, disruption, and “hacktivism.” At the beginning of 2025, we reported on one major espionage campaign, attributed to APT29, which targeted foreign affairs ministries. However, Russia nexus actors isn’t the only major player in this arena: Europe continues to face sustained pressure from Chinese and Iranian nexus threat actors as well, alongside a steady stream of financially-motivated groups targeting the continent. Camaro Dragon Targeting Government Sector In 2025, we tracked multiple Chinese-aligned actors targeting Europe. Within this broader set of operations, we observed a recurring campaign against European government agencies that looks like an evolution of the SmugX activity we reported in 2023. The campaign, likely a subset of Camaro Dragon (also known as Mustang Panda), uses well-crafted phishing to deliver PlugX payloads. The initial infection begins with spear-phishing emails sent from what appear to be government addresses, either compromised mailboxes or spoofed senders, targeting Foreign Affairs ministries across Europe. The messages contain a hyperlink to an HTML landing page hosted on Microsoft Azure’s cloud-based web storage service (*.web.core.windows.net). Figure 5 – Camero Dragon’s Infection Chain. When opened, the HTML executes a short, embedded JavaScript snippet that reconstructs and launches a download link. The script dynamically assembles the next stage URL using ASCII-encoded fragments, then redirects the browser to download an archive file such as 262a1003a2cd04993b29e687686eba573d6202fea8611c437ecbd6312802677a. This archive contains a Windows shortcut (LNK) file that serves as the dropper for the next stage. COLDRIVER in Southeast Europe Despite multiple recent public exposures, the Russian affiliated threat group COLDRIVER (also tracked as UNC4057, Star Blizzard, and Callisto) has not slowed down or paused its activity. Instead, the group continues to rapidly adapt its operations. In Q4 2025, we observed multiple campaigns impersonating US-based nonprofit organizations, including NED (National Endowment for Democracy) and USRF (The US–Russia Foundation), as well as campaigns targeting Southeast Europe that use fake websites impersonating a major regional media and broadcasting company. These campaigns highlight the group’s ability to quickly evolve its tooling and delivery mechanisms in response to exposure. As part of this evolution, COLDRIVER introduced changes to its multi-stage MAYBEROBOT (also known as SIMPLEFIX) malware delivery chain. Beginning with ClickFix-style self-infection, the updated chain incorporates additional stagers with enhanced attacker-side security measures, such as DGA and RSA-based authenticity checks for C2 communications. Figure 6 – ClickFix-style attack staged using a fake United Media website. Lying Pigeon Campaign Targeting the Moldovan Elections In 2024, we exposed Operation MiddleFloor, a campaign in Moldova by the Russian-speaking group Lying Pigeon. Ahead of the October 2024 presidential elections and EU referendum, the group used spoofed emails and forged documents, impersonating EU institutions, Moldovan ministries, and political figures to spread anti-European narratives. We also discovered that previously, Lying Pigeon also targeted other major European political events, including the NATO 2023 summit in Vilnius and Spain’s 2023 general elections. Since mid-April 2025, we observed a new wave of activity aimed at Moldova’s September parliamentary elections. Most of this activity used the same techniques as the MiddleFloor campaign, spreading fake documents to erode trust in Moldovan pro-European leadership. In addition, at the end of May, Lying Pigeon launched a large-scale defamation campaign using over a dozen domains to promote a poster contest attacking PAS, the ruling Party of Action and Solidarity founded by President Maia Sandu. Though framed as citizen-led, it was a coordinated propaganda and disinformation effort running on Lying Pigeon infrastructure. Interestingly, the contest site itself was cloned from a website of a Russian anti-terrorism poster competition held in 2024. In August, a phishing campaign targeting multiple organizations in Ukraine was launched from compromised email accounts. The emails masquerade as communications from the Ukrainian tax authorities and contain a malicious link to the 4sync.com file sharing service, prompting recipients to download a malicious archive named tax_gov_ua_zapit_15_08_2025_X.zip. Upon successful execution, a Remote IT support tool is installed on background, granting unauthorized access to the threat actor. This campaign shares similarities with UAC-0050. Figure 8 – UAC-0050 Phishing masquerading as tax.gov.ua. Zipline Shifting to Europe Earlier this year, we reported a sophisticated phishing campaign targeting US organizations with unusually elaborate social engineering. The campaign, named ZipLine, was noteworthy because the attacker reached out through the victim’s public “Contact Us” form, reversing the typical phishing flow and prompting the organization to initiate the email exchange. Since that publication, we’ve seen a noticeable shift in both the group’s TTPs and its targeting, with a clear refocus on Europe. Recent waves lean heavily on HR-themed lures, and our data suggests the actor is running country-by-country campaigns, most notably against the UK, Poland, Italy, and the Czech Republic. The tooling also appears to have evolved into newer iterations of MixShell, with the actor now relying almost entirely on herokuapp domains for C2 communication. Figure 9 – Zipline lure targets Europe. Asia Pacific and Central Asia The activity we observed across Asia reflects a sustained regional espionage push by Chinese-aligned actors. For much of the year, the dominant TTPs (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures) we saw were best described as updated versions of familiar playbooks: reusing modular backdoor ecosystems such as PlugX and ShadowPad, and repeating patterns that were effective for these groups in the past. At the same time, a smaller subset of APT activity stood out for being more deliberate and mature, reflecting a higher investment in tradecraft and operational discipline than the broader baseline we typically see in the region. However, the picture on the ground is still unclear as many of the same environments are targeted by multiple actors over long periods, leaving behind overlapping infrastructure, tooling, and artifacts. This creates an intertwined landscape that can be difficult to untangle, especially in Southeast Asia. GoldenSMTP Targeting Governments in Central Asia Throughout 2025, we observed multiple instances of activity that we determined to be an evolution of the IndigoZebra APT. These events primarily target Central Asia and rely on a mix of backdoors and supporting tools. Initial access is typically delivered via password-protected ZIP archives using phishing-style filenames, followed by DLL hijacking to install the first backdoor. Across the intrusion chain, we also saw a broader toolkit that included Pandora RC installer (open-source IT remote control software), shellcode loaders, and the NPPSPY credential stealer. Figure 10 – GoldenSMTP masquerades as SentinelOne Agent using debug strings. Next, the attackers deploy a dedicated SMTP/IMAP-based implant, named GoldenSMTP, which communicates through attacker-controlled email accounts, often named after local athletes, inside the target organization. This unusual C2 channel, combined with the use of compromised systems, appears to be at least partly responsible for the notably low detection rates of the backdoors installed in the later stages of the intrusion. Several of the samples showed code overlaps with older IndigoZebra malware, and the operation itself reflects familiar patterns: targeting Central Asia, reusing older infrastructure, relatively simple obfuscation, and checks for Russian-language systems. Flax Typhoon Targets IT Supply Chains in Taiwan We observed an intrusion set at a Taiwan-based cloud service provider where the threat actor abused legitimate security products to execute a DLL side-loading chain. The side-loaded DLL acted as a PlugX loader, which then brought in multiple plugins and injected them into other processes, with capabilities such as reverse shell access and keylogging. In this case, the built-in nslookup.exe utility was used to initiate C2 communication. After establishing a foothold, the attackers scanned the network and moved laterally using RDP. We also identified a SoftEther VPN binary placed at C:\Windows\SysWOW64\conhost.exe, a technique that other security vendors linked to the APT group known as Flax Typhoon. Flax Typhoon has been flagged by US government agencies as a major cyber risk for the technology ecosystem, including managed service providers (MSPs) and other IT service providers. SilverFox Attacks Web Servers The SilverFox APT group continues to target organizations across East Asia, with a particular focus on Taiwan and Japan, using a multi-stage backdoor known publicly as ValleyRAT. As part of the infection chain, the group employs a “bring your own vulnerable driver” (BYOVD) technique to terminate security product processes and reduce the chances of detection. We also identified a newly observed initial access vector: compromised PHP servers exposed to remote code execution. After successful exploitation, the group leverages the legitimate Windows msiexec component to install a ValleyRAT implant from hxxp[:]//aadcasc[.]cn-nb1[.]rains3[.]com/100ww.msi. Figure 11 – ValleyRAT web exploitation chain. YoroTrooper Targets Eurasian Economic Union Countries Throughout 2025, YoroTrooper, a threat group active in CIS countries since at least 2020, was observed targeting member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) countries and its regulatory body, the Eurasian Economic Commission. Targets included government and diplomatic entities, as well as infrastructure projects in these countries. The attackers used PDF documents to lure victims to either phishing pages that steal credentials or to cloud-based file sharing services hosting malware. Consistent with other YoroTrooper campaigns, the threat actors deployed “burner” RATs as payloads, typically leveraging services such as Telegram and Discord for C2 communications. Figure 12- Example of phishing PDF document (549df969dc5b340b4fc850584a01c767ca8a1bd712f16210f164f85e26c3e58b) targeting government entity in Kyrgyz Republic. APT36 Targeting Indian Aerospace Industry At the beginning of 2025, we identified a targeted phishing campaign aimed at government entities and the Indian aerospace industry. Based on infrastructure overlap, targeting focus, and operational tradecraft, we can attribute the activity with moderate confidence to APT36. Phishing emails, with the subject line “RFI for Surveillance Systems for [REDACTED] State Police,” were sent from a compromised legitimate local Indian government email account, lending significant credibility to the lure. The campaign leveraged ISO attachments containing malicious LNK files, which executed embedded batch scripts. These scripts deployed a stealer malware capable of exfiltrating documents and other sensitive files from compromised hosts, and shares code similarity with ObliqueRAT. Later in the year, we observed additional activity consistent with this campaign targeting entities in Afghanistan, indicating an expansion of the threat group’s operational scope. Figure 13 – Snippet of PDF lure targeting the Indian aerospace industry. Middle East and Africa Recent activity across the Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) region reflects a diversified threat landscape with state-aligned advanced persistent threat (APT) groups, private sector offensive actors (PSOAs), and destructive operators deploying wipers. Campaigns blend legacy social engineering with increasingly disciplined operational planning, and use legitimate cloud apps, and code-signing or supply chain-style trust signals to lower detection rates. Private Sector Offensive Actors Some of the more distinctive activity we’ve been tracking is commonly associated with what are known as Private Sector Offensive Actors (PSOA). Many of the PSOA-linked clusters we observed this year were active in the Middle East, where this type of innovative capability continues to surface. One of our prominent findings was the discovery of a zero-day exploited by StealthFalcon: CVE-2025-33053, a vulnerability used to target high-profile organizations in Turkey, Qatar, Egypt, Ethiopia and Yemen. StealthFalcon, however, is not unique. Throughout 2025, we identified additional activity clusters that stood out in terms of their behavior and tradecraft. We came across one of them while tracking high-profile sample submitters in the Middle East. The activity consisted of a cluster of suspicious TIFF (an image file format for storing raster graphic images) files that contained embedded ELF payloads aimed at Android devices. Our analysis indicated the files were exploiting a vulnerability, later disclosed as CVE-2025-21042, in the way Samsung parses TIFF/DNG files. Based on the tradecraft, infrastructure overlaps, and recurring keywords like “Bridge Head,” we assess the operator to be a private sector offensive actor. Additional research into the same activity, called LANDFALL, reached similar conclusions. We saw indications the campaign affected targets in Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Bahrain, Morocco and Pakistan. Iranian Activity Israeli-Iranian War: Targeting Cameras During the twelve-day Israeli–Iranian war in June, threat actors largely stuck to their familiar playbooks, primarily using spear phishing campaigns to deploy wipers and backdoors. One standout trend we observed was a sharp increase in attempts to compromise specific Israeli cameras by exploiting CVE-2023-6895 and CVE-2017-7921 via infrastructure we associate with Iranian actors. In several major conflicts in recent years, compromising internet-connected cameras proved to be an effective way to support bombing damage assessment (BDA) by providing near–real-time visibility into strike impacts. This wave targeting Israeli cameras appears to fit that pattern and aligns with prior public disclosures by Israeli officials that Iran-nexus actors seek access to private CCTV feeds to assess the accuracy of their missile strikes and refine subsequent targeting efforts. Figure 14 – Spike in cameras targeting in Israel. MuddyWater Password Spray in Israeli Municipality In late June, a successful password spray activity originating from a Nord VPN infrastructure affected a municipal government in Israel. One month later, we observed a successful login attempt from the same attacker infrastructure to an email account which then sent spear phishing emails to recipients in Israel. The phishing email contained an embedded link, hxxps[:]//pharmacynod[.]com/join/join.html, used as a decoy invitation to join a Teams conversation. The landing page is a ClickFix page that tricks the user into pasting a PowerShell script into the Run dialog and executing it. This script is a RAT which initially collects information about the infected machine and can execute arbitrary PowerShell commands received from the command and control server. This script’s obfuscation method aligns with previous PowerShell backdoors associated with MuddyWater. Figure 15 – MuddyWater ClickFix Teams lure. Nimbus Manticore Activity in Africa We recently uncovered a long-running campaign that we attribute to Nimbus Manticore, an IRGC-affiliated actor active across the region and parts of Europe. What we observed highlights this actor’s evolution: while continuing to lean on familiar phishing themes, the actor has also begun deploying more sophisticated malware, making himself something of an outlier compared to much of the broader Iranian threat landscape. As we continue to track this operation, we’ve observed renewed activity targeting Northeast Africa, impersonating T-Mobile with a fake hiring website careerst-mobile[.]com and using similar tradecraft which suggests the campaign remains active and adaptable. Figure 16 – Renewed Nimbus Manticore phishing activity targeting Africa with impersonated T-Mobile site. Iran-Nexus Wipers Throughout the year, multiple Iran-aligned actors targeted Israel with disruptive campaigns involving wipers and ransomware. These operations, often at least partly opportunistic, are designed to interfere with the day-to-day functioning of Israeli organizations. Among the most prominent groups behind this activity are Void Manticore (Handala Hack) and Cotton Sandstorm, carrying out attacks using ‘WhiteLock’ ransomware, deployed after WezRat infostealer. Figure 17 – ‘WhiteLock’ ransomware chat server. One such campaign, likely conducted by Handala, involved a phishing email sent to hundreds of organizations across Israel. The messages were delivered from a compromised account belonging to an Israeli CRM solution provider. Recipients were instructed to “back up” their files by downloading a malicious .msi installer (6eb7dbf27a25639c7f11c05fd88ea2a301e0ca93d3c3bdee1eb5917fc60a56ff) hosted on Mega file share. When executed, the installer deployed a wiper that iterates over user file folders and overwrites files with spaces. In parallel, a malicious PowerShell script changed the user’s desktop wallpaper to display a political message tied to the Israeli-Hamas war. WIRTE: Espionage and Sabotage At the end of 2024, we published research connecting a wave of destructive activity in Israel, known as ‘Cyber Toufan Al-Aqsa’, to WIRTE, a Hamas-associated threat actor. In 2025, the group continued its destructive operations with new variants of SameCoin wiper, while also running parallel campaigns aimed at Arabic-speaking political entities across the Middle East, with a particular focus on Jordan and Egypt. In these campaigns, targets are lured into downloading a malicious archive (1f3bd755de24e00af2dba61f938637d1cc0fbfd6166dba014e665033ad4445c0) from a Dropbox URL. After the archive is extracted, the victim is presented with a benign Microsoft binary and a decoy file bearing an Arabic-language filename, which the user is prompted to open. That execution triggers DLL side-loading, pulling in a malicious DLL that serves as a loader. It also exfiltrates Base64‑encoded host information to a remote C2 server, and downloads and executes an additional payload, most commonly Havoc. In recent activity, the attacker used DigitalOcean-hosted infrastructure for C2 instead of the Cloudflare-backed setup that featured in previous longer-running operations. Figure 18 – Wirte Arabic-language lure. Conclusion Looking back at 2025, the threat landscape became more crowded, messy, and increasingly interconnected. Across different regions, we saw state-backed groups, private offensive actors, and high-end cybercrime operating side by side, sometimes even within the same networks. Zero-days, cloud-focused intrusions, and well-crafted phishing are no longer just rare outliers; we observed them repeatedly in multiple attacks as practical, reliable ways to get results. At the same time, many of the campaigns we uncovered show that novelty often lies less in entirely new tooling and more in how familiar techniques are combined and deployed. Actors reused infrastructure, malware frameworks, and social engineering themes, but adapted them to new targets, regions, and operational goals. In several cases, incomplete or internal-only research threads offered insight into how attackers test ideas, quietly iterate, and refine their approach over time. Ultimately, these observations reinforce the need for sustained visibility, collaboration, and context-driven research. Threat actors continue to invest where impact matters most, while opportunistic campaigns exploit gaps that are overlooked or left unpatched. By sharing these stories, both the well-known and the previously untold, we hope to contribute to a clearer picture of attackers’ behavior and help strengthen collaboration between security researchers and vendors moving forward. “The Turkish Rat” Evolved Adwind in a Massive Ongoing Phishing Campaign Check Point Research Publications August 11, 2017 “The Next WannaCry” Vulnerability is Here Check Point Research Publications March 12, 2026 “Handala Hack” – Unveiling Group’s Modus Operandi SUBSCRIBE TO CYBER INTELLIGENCE REPORTS We value your privacy! BFSI uses cookies on this site. We use cookies to enable faster and easier experience for you. By continuing to visit this website you agree to our use of cookies.
research.checkpoint.comFeb 23, 2026extracted
Data breach di Odido: quando il social engineering batte qualsiasi firewall
Immaginate un attaccante che non usa vulnerabilità zero-day, non forza nessun sistema di autenticazione e non acquista tool sofisticati sul dark web. Immaginate, invece, qualcuno che scrive un’e-mail, fa una telefonata e poi, con la sola forza della manipolazione psicologica, apre le porte di uno dei più grandi operatori telefonici d’Europa. È esattamente quello che è successo a Odido, la principale telco dei Paesi Bassi con oltre 6 milioni di clienti: una violazione che non solo espone dati sensibili di massa, ma riaccende in modo prepotente il dibattito su quanto il fattore umano rimanga il tallone d’Achille irrisolto della cyber security aziendale. Come sottolinea Sandro Sana, Ethical Hacker e membro del Comitato Scientifico Cyber 4.0, “il caso Odido dimostra, ancora una volta, che la MFA (autenticazione a più fattori) non viene “bucata”: viene gentilmente consegnata. Quando il social engineering entra in gioco, firewall e controlli tecnici diventano comparse”. Indice degli argomenti Il 14 febbraio 2026 Odido – nato dalla fusione tra T-Mobile Netherlands e Tele2 Netherlands nel 2022 – ha comunicato ufficialmente alla propria base clienti un grave incidente di sicurezza informatica. L’azienda ha notificato l’Autorità olandese per la protezione dei dati (AP) e avviato un processo di notifica che, secondo fonti interne, richiederebbe fino a due giorni per raggiungere tutti i destinatari. Il vettore iniziale dell’attacco, ricostruito da fonti vicine all’indagine e riportato dalla testata olandese NOS, segue uno schema di multi-stage social engineering ormai consolidato ma ancora drammaticamente efficace: Fase 1, phishing: nella prima fase, gli attaccanti hanno inviato email di phishing mirate a dipendenti del call center — in particolare a operatori di call center esternalizzati — riuscendo a sottrarre le relative credenziali di accesso. Fase 2, vishing ed MFA Bypass: con le credenziali in mano, ma bloccati dall’autenticazione multi-fattore (MFA), gli attaccanti hanno chiamato telefonicamente le stesse vittime spacciandosi per tecnici del reparto IT interno di Odido, convincendole ad approvare il tentativo di accesso. Fase 3, esfiltrazione dati: una volta dentro, gli attaccanti hanno avuto accesso al sistema CRM Salesforce, da cui hanno iniziato un’estrazione sistematica dei dati dei clienti tramite scraping programmatico. La tecnica descritta corrisponde perfettamente a quello che in gergo tecnico si chiama MFA fatigue attack o real-time phishing proxy: l’attaccante non rompe la MFA, la scavalca semplicemente convincendo l’utente legittimo ad approvare la richiesta di autenticazione. Una distinzione sottile ma fondamentale. Odido ha ufficialmente comunicato che il data breach ha interessato un “sistema di contatto clienti” che, secondo alcune fonti, potrebbe essere identificato con la piattaforma CRM Salesforce utilizzata dai call center. La buona notizia, se di buona notizia si può parlare, è che password, dettagli delle chiamate e dati di fatturazione non sono stati compromessi. La cattiva notizia è che per una parte significativa degli utenti notificati (stimati in circa 6,2 milioni tra clienti attuali ed ex-clienti) i dati potenzialmente esposti includono elementi ad alto rischio di sfruttamento secondario: nomi e cognomi; indirizzi di residenza e indirizzi e-mail; IBAN bancari; date di nascita; numeri di documento di identità: passaporto e/o patente di guida. Nel data breach di Odido sarebbero interessati anche i clienti del brand sussidiario Ben, operatore low-cost che eroga servizi su base contrattuale senza piani a lungo termine. La combinazione di questi dati (identità anagrafica, coordinate bancarie, documento d’identità) rappresenta un kit pressoché completo per attività di identity fraud e spear phishing. Le incognite sul furto dell’intero database clienti Secondo fonti vicine all’indagine sul data breach di Odido, non è ancora possibile escludere che gli attaccanti abbiano scaricato l’intero database clienti. Un dump completo dei dati avrebbe richiesto diversi giorni di attività non rilevata, uno scenario tecnicamente plausibile ma non ancora confermato. L’esperto di cyber security Seymen Rouvhof ha confermato: “Con questo tipo di attacco, raccogliere tutti i record richiede, in genere, giorni. Le azioni devono rimanere inosservate durante quel periodo”. È inoltre importante sottolineare che La combinazione IBAN + nome + indirizzo + numero del documento d’identità è sufficiente per: aprire conti bancari o linee di credito fraudolente; effettuare SIM swap per aggirare l’autenticazione bancaria; costruire spear phishing altamente personalizzati verso i 6,2M di vittime; impersonare Odido in fatture false o comunicazioni urgenti. Per chi lavora ogni giorno nel campo della cyber security difensiva, il data breach di Odido non è una sorpresa: è la conferma di un pattern osservabile che si ripete con cadenza sempre più frequente. Il social engineering di nuova generazione non è il classico principe nigeriano delle e-mail spam degli anni 90. È un’operazione chirurgica, scalabile e spesso automatizzata, costruita su tre pilastri psicologici fondamentali: Autorità (Authority). L’attaccante si è presentato come membro dell’IT interno, sfruttando il principio di compliance all’autorità descritto dallo psicologo statunitense Robert Cialdini nel suo libro “Le armi della persuasione”, insieme alle altre sei tendenze umane (autorevolezza, reciprocità, scarsità, coerenza, riprova sociale e simpatia). I dipendenti dei call center – spesso terzisti, poco integrati nella cultura di sicurezza dell’azienda madre – tendono a obbedire alle richieste percepite come “tecniche” provenienti dall’IT, anche se non le comprendono pienamente. Urgenza (Scarcity/Urgency). La narrativa usata durante la chiamata vishing era quasi certamente costruita intorno all’urgenza: “C’è un problema di sicurezza sul tuo account, devi approvare immediatamente questa verifica”. L’urgenza inibisce il pensiero critico e accelera la decisione impulsiva. Scarcity of Information. I dipendenti target non avevano modo rapido di verificare l’identità del chiamante. I sistemi di autenticazione interna per le telefonate aziendali sono ancora oggi raramente implementati, creando un gap di verifica che gli attaccanti sfruttano sistematicamente. È utile sottolineare, inoltre, che il vettore d’attacco descritto è riconducibile alla famiglia degli attacchi di tipo MFA bypass via social engineering. In particolare, la tecnica del “vishing post-phishing” è documentata nel framework MITRE ATT&CK alla voce T1566.004 (Spearphishing Voice) combinata con T1621 (Multi-Factor Authentication Request Generation). La particolarità di questo attacco è la fase di handoff: il phishing cattura le credenziali, mentre il vishing completa il bypass MFA in real-time. Il tutto senza alcun exploit tecnico. Una tecnica, questa, che è stata osservata anche negli attacchi contro MGM Resorts (2023), Uber (2022) e Twilio (2022): tre casi in cui il social engineering ha preceduto o sostituito l’hacking tecnico. Uno degli elementi più rilevanti per i professionisti IT emerge dal vettore di esfiltrazione nel data breach di Odido: il sistema compromesso pare sia stato Salesforce, la piattaforma CRM dominante nel mercato Enterprise. Questo dettaglio merita un’analisi specifica. I sistemi CRM come Salesforce aggregano per definizione i dati più sensibili di un’organizzazione lato customer. Ironia della sorte, più il CRM è ben implementato, con profili cliente completi, storico interazioni, dati anagrafici completi, più diventa appetibile come target di esfiltrazione massiva. Nel data breach di Odido, una volta ottenute le credenziali di un account operatore legittimo, gli attaccanti hanno potuto sfruttare le API native del CRM o semplicemente la navigazione programmatica del portale per estrarre dati in modo automatizzato: una tecnica che gli analisti definiscono una “programmatic scraping session”. “Abbiamo implementato la MFA, siamo al sicuro”. Questa frase, ripetuta in quasi ogni assessment aziendale, è diventata pericolosamente fuorviante: il caso Odido è l’ennesima dimostrazione che la MFA è necessaria, ma non sufficiente. La MFA basata su notifiche push (come quelle di Microsoft Authenticator o Google Authenticator) presuppone che l’utente sappia distinguere una notifica legittima da una fraudolenta. Presuppone, cioè, un livello di consapevolezza che, soprattutto in ambienti di call center ad alto turnover e bassa formazione specifica, non può essere dato per scontato. Gli attaccanti, nel caso Odido, hanno semplicemente chiamato il dipendente mentre la notifica push era attiva, creando un contesto narrativo convincente (“Sono dell’IT, sto configurando il tuo account, approva la notifica che ti è arrivata”) che ha portato la vittima ad approvare consapevolmente, pur non sapendo cosa stesse approvando, l’accesso non autorizzato. Per configurare un sistema di autenticazione multifattoriale resistente ai tentativi di attacchi di tipo social engineering è utile adottare le seguenti raccomandazioni: Utilizzare passkey e sistemi FIDO2: eliminano il problema alla radice. L’autenticazione è device-bound ed è crittograficamente legata al sito o all’app di destinazione, per cui non c’è alcuna notifica push da approvare. Number matching: se si usa la push MFA, è consigliabile abilitare il “number matching” per mostrare all’utente un codice da inserire nel telefono. Ciò riduce drasticamente il rischio di false approvazioni di accesso. Security awareness contestuale: è molto utile anche addestrare i dipendenti specificamente sullo scenario “qualcuno vi chiama e vi chiede di approvare una notifica”, spiegando loro come comportarsi in situazioni del genere. MFA resistente al phishing: dovrebbe essere obbligatoria per i sistemi in cui vengono trattati dati sensibili. Zero-trust per i call center terzisti: violazioni di sicurezza come quella di Odido dimostrano che il modello “trust but verify” non funziona più. I call center esternalizzati devono operare in ambienti containerizzati con visibilità ridotta e monitoraggio continuo delle sessioni. Come evidenzia ancora Sandro Sana, “il vero problema non è Salesforce né la tecnologia utilizzata, ma l’illusione che l’autenticazione multi-fattore sia una misura risolutiva senza formazione, processi e controlli sull’operato dei terzisti”. “Questo data breach”, continua l’analista, “è l’ennesima prova che il perimetro più fragile resta quello umano e che la supply chain, soprattutto nei call center esternalizzati, continua a essere il punto cieco di molte organizzazioni. La sicurezza non si compra a licenza: si governa”. Il data breach di Odido apre scenari interessanti e preoccupanti sul piano regolatorio europeo. La violazione coinvolge dati di cittadini olandesi ed europei, gestiti attraverso una piattaforma (Salesforce) e operatori di call center esternalizzati. Una catena di responsabilità complessa che il GDPR e la direttiva NIS2 devono intercettare. Odido ha già notificato l’Autorità olandese per la protezione dei dati (AP) nei tempi previsti dall’art. 33 del GDPR, entro 72 ore dall’individuazione della violazione, e la notifica ai soggetti interessati è in corso. Sul fronte NIS2, Odido come operatore di telecomunicazioni rientra tra i soggetti essenziali, con obblighi rafforzati in materia di gestione del rischio e notifica agli enti competenti. Il nodo più critico, però, riguarda i call center terzisti. Se la violazione è originata da account di dipendenti di fornitori esterni, si pone con forza la questione dell’adeguatezza dei controlli di sicurezza imposti contrattualmente ai responsabili del trattamento ai sensi dell’art. 28 GDPR. La domanda è semplice: i contratti con i call center prevedevano obblighi specifici di formazione anti-phishing e di gestione sicura dell’MFA? In caso contrario, Odido ne risponde in solido. Odido ha comunicato ai clienti di aspettarsi possibili abusi derivati dall’esposizione dei loro dati, con una specifica attenzione alle fatture false che potrebbero sembrare provenire dall’operatore stesso. Ecco i consigliamo da seguire concretamente per proteggersi da questi tentativi di truffa, sottolineando che questi stessi consigli sono validi sempre indipendentemente dal caso specifico: Verificare ogni comunicazione finanziaria ricevuta da Odido accedendo direttamente al portale Odido, senza cliccare su link nelle email o SMS. Attivare alert sulle movimentazioni bancarie collegate all’IBAN potenzialmente esposto. Monitorare eventuali richieste di credito o aperture di conti effettuate a proprio nome, richiedendo una verifica alla propria banca. Non condividere ulteriori dati sensibili a seguito di comunicazioni non verificate che si presentano come Odido. In caso di sospetto utilizzo fraudolento dei documenti esposti (passaporto, patente), contattare le autorità competenti per richiedere un alert sul proprio codice documento. Da questo incidente emergono almeno cinque lezioni strutturali che ogni responsabile della sicurezza dovrebbe portare al prossimo board meeting: Il perimetro umano è il perimetro più vulnerabile.Nessun firewall, nessun EDR, nessun SIEM protegge dall’ingegneria sociale se i dipendenti non sono adeguatamente formati. La security awareness non è un costo overhead: è un controllo di sicurezza critico con ROI misurabile (riduzione del tasso di click su phishing simulati). I terzisti sono estensioni del perimetro aziendale. Un call center esterno che gestisce dati dei clienti è, a tutti gli effetti, parte del perimetro di sicurezza aziendale. I loro dipendenti devono ricevere la stessa formazione che ricevono i vostri. I loro sistemi devono rispettare i vostri standard. Questo va negoziato contrattualmente, non dato per scontato. Il CRM è infrastruttura critica. Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics: questi sistemi contengono i gioielli della corona dei dati cliente. Trattarli come applicazioni ordinarie, senza monitoraggio comportamentale dedicato e controlli di accesso granulari, è un rischio sistemico inaccettabile. La MFA si bypassa: usare MFA resistente al phishing. Come evidenziato, la push MFA tradizionale non è più sufficiente contro attaccanti motivati. La transizione verso Passkeys e FIDO2 non è più un nice-to-have: è una necessità operativa, specialmente per i sistemi che contengono dati personali di milioni di utenti. Detection veloce, prevention perfetta. Nella realtà operativa, la prevenzione assoluta è un’utopia. Il vero differenziatore è la velocità di rilevamento. Nel caso Odido, l’esfiltrazione ha richiesto potenzialmente giorni. Un sistema di rilevamento comportamentale sulle sessioni Salesforce – anomalie nel volume di record consultati, orari di accesso insoliti, geoIP anomali – avrebbe potuto bloccare l’operazione molto prima. Il data breach di Odido non sarà l’ultimo del suo genere. Anzi: con la crescente sofisticazione degli strumenti di AI generativa – che permettono di creare e-mail di phishing grammaticalmente perfette, deepfake vocali convincenti per il vishing e profili social costruiti ad hoc per aumentare la credibilità degli attaccanti – il social engineering di nuova generazione diventerà il vettore dominante degli anni a venire. La risposta non può essere solo tecnologica, ma richiede un cambio di paradigma culturale nelle organizzazioni: la sicurezza non è responsabilità esclusiva del team IT, è responsabilità di ogni singola persona che ha accesso a sistemi aziendali, dai manager ai call center, dai developer agli stagisti. Dunque, il messaggio da portare sempre ai propri clienti è questo: “Il vostro attaccante più pericoloso non è nel dark web. Probabilmente ha già il vostro numero di telefono interno“. E Odido lo ha scoperto nel modo più costoso possibile.
cybersecurity360.itFeb 18, 2026extracted
Divide and conquer: how the new Keenadu backdoor exposed links between major Android botnets
In April 2025, we reported on a then-new iteration of the Triada backdoor that had compromised the firmware of counterfeit Android devices sold across major marketplaces. The malware was deployed to the system partitions and hooked into Zygote – the parent process for all Android apps – to infect any app on the device. This allowed the Trojan to exfiltrate credentials from messaging apps and social media platforms, among other things. This discovery prompted us to dive deeper, looking for other Android firmware-level threats. Our investigation uncovered a new backdoor, dubbed Keenadu, which mirrored Triada’s behavior by embedding itself into the firmware to compromise every app launched on the device. Keenadu proved to have a significant footprint; following its initial detection, we saw a surge in support requests from our users seeking further information about the threat. This report aims to address most of the questions and provide details on this new threat. Our findings can be summarized as follows: We discovered a new backdoor, which we dubbed Keenadu, in the firmware of devices belonging to several brands. The infection occurred during the firmware build phase, where a malicious static library was linked with libandroid_runtime.so . Once active on the device, the malware injected itself into theZygote process, similarly to Triada. In several instances, the compromised firmware was delivered with an OTA update. A copy of the backdoor is loaded into the address space of every app upon launch. The malware is a multi-stage loader granting its operators the unrestricted ability to control the victim’s device remotely. We successfully intercepted the payloads retrieved by Keenadu. Depending on the targeted app, these modules hijack the search engine in the browser, monetize new app installs, and stealthily interact with ad elements. One specific payload identified during our research was also found embedded in numerous standalone apps distributed via third-party repositories, as well as official storefronts like Google Play and Xiaomi GetApps. In certain firmware builds, Keenadu was integrated directly into critical system utilities, including the facial recognition service, the launcher app, and others. Our investigation established a link between some of the most prolific Android botnets: Triada, BADBOX, Vo1d, and Keenadu. The complete Keenadu infection chain looks like this: Kaspersky solutions detect the threats described below with the following verdicts: HEUR:Backdoor.AndroidOS.Keenadu.* HEUR:Trojan-Downloader.AndroidOS.Keenadu.* HEUR:Trojan-Clicker.AndroidOS.Keenadu.* HEUR:Trojan-Spy.AndroidOS.Keenadu.* HEUR:Trojan.AndroidOS.Keenadu.* HEUR:Trojan-Dropper.AndroidOS.Gegu.* Malicious dropper in libandroid_runtime.so At the very beginning of the investigation, our attention was drawn to suspicious libraries located at /system/lib/libandroid_runtime.so and /system/lib64/libandroid_runtime.so – we will use the shorthand /system/lib[64]/ to denote these two directories. The library exists in the original Android source. Specifically, it defines the println_native native method for the android.util.Log class. Apps utilize this method to write to the logcat system log. In the suspicious libraries, the implementation of println_native differed from the legitimate version by the call of a single function: The suspicious function decrypted data from the library body using RC4 and wrote it to /data/dalvik-cache/arm[64]/system@framework@[email protected]. The data represents a payload that is loaded via DexClassLoader. The entry point within it is the main method of the com.ak.test.Main class, where “ak” likely refers to the author’s internal name for the malware; this letter combination is also used in other locations throughout the code. In particular, the developers left behind a significant amount of code that writes error messages to the logcat log during the malware’s execution. These messages have the AK_CPP tag. The payload checks whether it is running within system apps belonging either to Google services or to Sprint or T-Mobile carriers. The latter apps are typically found in specialized device versions that carriers sell at a discount, provided the buyer signs a service contract. The malware aborts its execution if it finds that it’s running within these processes. It also implements a kill switch that terminates its execution if it finds files with specific names in system directories. Next, the Trojan checks if it is running within the system_server process. This process controls the entire system and possesses maximum privileges; it is launched by the Zygote process when it starts. If the check returns positive, the Trojan creates an instance of the AKServer class; if the code is running in any other process, it creates an instance of the AKClient class instead. It then calls the new object’s virtual method, passing the app process name to it. The class names suggest that the Trojan is built upon a client-server architecture. The system_server process creates and launches various system services with the help of the SystemServiceManager class. These services are based on a client-server architecture, and clients for them are requested within app code by calling the Context.getSystemService method. Communication with the server-side component uses the Android inter-process communication (IPC) primitive, binder. This approach offers numerous security and other benefits. These include, among other things, the ability to restrict certain apps from accessing various system services and their functionality, as well as the presence of abstractions that simplify the use of this access for developers while simultaneously protecting the system from potential vulnerabilities in apps. The authors of Keenadu designed it in a similar fashion. The core logic is located in the AKServer class, which operates within the system_server process. AKServer essentially represents a malicious system service, while AKClient acts as the interface for accessing AKServer via binder. For convenience, we provide a diagram of the backdoor’s architecture below: It is important to highlight Keenadu as yet another case where we find key Android security principles being compromised. First, because the malware is embedded in libandroid_runtime.so, it operates within the context of every app on the device, thereby gaining access to all their data and rendering the system’s intended app sandboxing meaningless. Second, it provides interfaces for bypassing permissions (discussed below) that are used to control app privileges within the system. Consequently, it represents a full-fledged backdoor that allows attackers to gain virtually unrestricted control over the victim’s device. AKClient architecture AKClient is relatively straightforward in its design. It is injected into every app launched on the device and retrieves an interface instance for server communication via a protected broadcast (com.action.SystemOptimizeService). Using binder, this interface sends an attach transaction to the malicious AKServer, passing an IPC wrapper that facilitates the loading of arbitrary DEX files within the context of the compromised app. This allows AKServer to execute custom malicious payloads tailored to the specific app it has targeted. AKServer architecture At the start of its execution, AKServer sends two protected broadcasts: com.action.SystemOptimizeService and com.action.SystemProtectService. As previously described, the first broadcast delivers an interface instance to other AKClient-infected processes for interacting with AKServer. Along with the com.action.SystemProtectService message, an instance of another interface for interacting with AKServer is transmitted. Malicious modules downloaded within the contexts of other apps can use this interface to: Grant any permission to an arbitrary app on the device. Revoke any permission from an arbitrary app on the device. Retrieve the device’s geolocation. Exfiltrate device information. Once interaction between the server and client components is established, AKServer launches its primary malicious task, titled MainWorker. Upon its initial launch, MainWorker logs the current system time. Following this, the malware checks the device’s language settings and time zone. If the interface language is a Chinese dialect and the device is located within a Chinese time zone, the malware terminates. It also remains inactive if either the Google Play Store or Google Play Services are absent from the device. If the device passes these checks, the Trojan initiates the PluginTask task. At the start of its routine, PluginTask decrypts the command-and-control server addresses from the code as follows: The encrypted address string is decoded using Base64. The resulting data, a gzip-compressed buffer, is then decompressed. The decompressed data is decrypted using AES-128 in CFB mode. The decryption key is the MD5 hash of the string "ota.host.ba60d29da7fd4794b5c5f732916f7d5c" , and the initialization vector is the string"0102030405060708" . After decrypting the C2 server addresses, the Trojan collects victim device metadata, such as the model, IMEI, MAC address, and OS version, and encrypts it using the same method as the server addresses, but this time it utilizes the MD5 hash of the string "ota.api.bbf6e0a947a5f41d7f5226affcfd858c" as the AES key. The encrypted data is sent to the C2 server via a POST request to the path /ak/api/pts/v4. The request parameters include two values: m: the MD5 hash of the device IMEI n: the network connection type (“w” for Wi-Fi, and “m” for mobile data) The response from the C2 server contains a code field, which may hold an error code returned by the server. If this field has a zero value, no error has occurred. In this case, the response will include a data field: a JSON object encrypted in the same manner as the request data and containing information about the payloads. How Keenadu compromised libandroid_runtime.so After analyzing the initial infection stages, we set out to determine exactly how the backdoor was being integrated into Android device firmware. Almost immediately, we discovered public reports from Alldocube tablet users regarding suspicious DNS queries originating from their devices. This vendor had previously acknowledged the presence of malware in one of its tablet models. However, the company’s statement contained no specifics regarding which malware had compromised the devices or how the breach occurred. We will attempt to answer these questions. The DNS queries described by the original complainant also appeared suspicious to us. According to our telemetry, the Keenadu C2 domains obtained at that time resolved to the IP addresses listed below: 67.198.232[.]4 67.198.232[.]187 The domains keepgo123[.]com and gsonx[.]com mentioned in the complaint resolved to these same addresses, which may indicate that the complainant’s tablet was also infected with Keenadu. However, matching IP addresses alone is insufficient for a definitive attribution. To test this hypothesis, it was necessary to examine the device itself. We considered purchasing the same tablet model, but this proved unnecessary: as it turns out, Alldocube publishes firmware archives for its devices publicly, allowing anyone to audit them for malware. To analyze the firmware, one must first determine the storage format of its contents. Alldocube firmware packages are RAR archives containing various image files, other types of files, and a Windows-based flashing utility. From an analytical standpoint, the Android file system holds the most value. Its primary partitions, including the system partition, are contained within the image file super.img. This is an Android Sparse Image. For the sake of brevity, we will omit a technical breakdown of this format (which can be reconstructed from the libsparse code); it is sufficient to note that there are open-source utilities to extract partitions from these files in the form of standard file system images. We extracted libandroid_runtime.so from the Alldocube iPlay 50 mini Pro (T811M) firmware dated August 18, 2023. Upon examining the library, we discovered the Keenadu backdoor. Furthermore, we decrypted the payload and extracted C2 server addresses hosted on the keepgo123[.]com and gsonx[.]com domains, confirming the user’s suspicions: their devices were indeed infected with this backdoor. Notably, all subsequent firmware versions for this model also proved to be infected, including those released after the vendor’s public statement. Special attention should be paid to the firmware for the Alldocube iPlay 50 mini Pro NFE model. The “NFE” (Netflix Enabled) part of the name indicates that these devices include an additional DRM module to support high-quality streaming. To achieve this, they must meet the Widevine L1 standard under the Google Widevine DRM premium media protection system. Consequently, they process media within a TEE (Trusted Execution Environment), which mitigates the risk of untrusted code accessing content and thus prevents unauthorized media copying. While Widevine certification failed to protect these devices from infection, the initial Alldocube iPlay 50 mini Pro NFE firmware (released November 7, 2023) was clean – unlike other models’ initial firmware. However, every subsequent version, including the latest release from May 20, 2024, contained Keenadu. Recently, Alldocube issued several new firmware versions and asked Kaspersky to check them for Keenadu. Kaspersky can confirm that the firmware versions that Alldocube has shared are not infected. During our analysis of the Alldocube device firmware, we discovered that all images carried valid digital signatures. This implies that simply compromising an OTA update server would have been insufficient for an attacker to inject the backdoor into libandroid_runtime.so. They would also need to gain possession of the private signing keys, which normally should not be accessible from an OTA server. Consequently, it is highly probable that the Trojan was integrated into the firmware during the build phase. Furthermore, we have found a static library, libVndxUtils.a (MD5: ca98ae7ab25ce144927a46b7fee6bd21), containing the Keenadu code, which further supports our hypothesis. This malicious library is written in C++ and was compiled using the CMake build system. Interestingly, the library retained absolute file paths to the source code on the developer’s machine: D:\work\git\zh\os\ak-client\ak-client\loader\src\main\cpp\__log_native_load.cpp: this file contains the dropper code. D:\work\git\zh\os\ak-client\ak-client\loader\src\main\cpp\__log_native_data.cpp: this file contains the RC4-encrypted payload along with its size metadata. The dropper’s entry point is the function __log_check_tag_count. The attacker inserted a call to this function directly into the implementation of the println_native method. According to our data, the malicious dependency was located within the firmware source code repository at the following paths: vendor/mediatek/proprietary/external/libutils/arm/libVndxUtils.a vendor/mediatek/proprietary/external/libutils/arm64/libVndxUtils.a Interestingly, the Trojan within libandroid_runtime.so decrypts and writes the payload to disk at /data/dalvik-cache/arm[64]/system@framework@[email protected]. The attacker most likely attempted to disguise the malicious libandroid_runtime.so dependency as a supposedly legitimate “vndx” component containing proprietary code from MediaTek. In reality, no such component exists in MediaTek products. Finally, according to our telemetry, the Trojan is found not only in Alldocube devices but also in hardware from other manufacturers. In all instances, the backdoor is embedded within tablet firmware. We have notified these vendors about the compromise. Based on the evidence presented above, we believe that Keenadu was integrated into Android device firmware as the result of a supply chain attack. One stage of the firmware supply chain was compromised, leading to the inclusion of a malicious dependency within the source code. Consequently, the vendors may have been unaware that their devices were infected prior to reaching the market. Keenadu backdoor modules As previously noted, the inherent architecture of Keenadu allows attackers to gain virtually unrestricted control over the victim’s device. To understand exactly how they leveraged this capability, we analyzed the payloads downloaded by the backdoor. To achieve this, we crafted a request to the C2 server, masquerading as an infected device. Initially, the C2 server did not deliver any files; instead, it returned a timestamp for the next check-in, scheduled 2.5 months after the initial request. Through black-box analysis of the C2 server, we determined that the request includes the backdoor’s activation time; if 2.5 months have not elapsed since that moment, the C2 will not serve any payloads. This is likely a technique designed to complicate analysis and minimize the probability of these payloads being detected. Once we modified the activation time in our request to a sufficiently distant date in the past, the C2 server returned the list of payloads for analysis. The attacker’s server delivers information about the payloads as an object array. Each object contains a download link for the payload, its MD5 hash, target app package names, target process names, and other metadata. An example of such an object is provided below. Notably, the attackers chose Alibaba Cloud as their CDN provider. Files downloaded by Keenadu utilize a proprietary format to store the encrypted payload and its configuration. A pseudocode description of this format is presented below (struct KeenaduPayload): After downloading, Keenadu verifies the file integrity using MD5. The Trojan’s creators also implemented a code-signing mechanism using the DSA algorithm. The signature is verified before the payload is decrypted and executed. This ensures that only an attacker in possession of the private key can generate malicious payloads. Upon successful verification, the configuration and the malicious module are decrypted using AES-128 in CFB mode. The decryption key is the MD5 hash of the string that is a concatenation of "37d9a33df833c0d6f11f1b8079aaa2dc" and a salt, while the initialization vector is the string "0102030405060708". The configuration contains information regarding the module’s entry and exit points, its name, and its version. An example configuration for one of the modules is provided below. Having outlined the backdoor’s algorithm for loading malicious modules, we will now proceed to their analysis. Keenadu loader This module (MD5: 4c4ca7a2a25dbe15a4a39c11cfef2fb2) targets popular online storefronts with the following package names: com.amazon.mShop.android.shopping (Amazon) com.zzkko (SHEIN) com.einnovation.temu (Temu) The entry point is the start method of the com.ak.p.d.MainApi class. This class initiates a malicious task named HsTask, which serves as a loader conceptually similar to AKServer. Upon execution, the loader collects victim device metadata (model, IMEI, MAC address, OS version, and so on) as well as information regarding the specific app within which it is running. The collected data is encoded using the same method as the AKServer requests sent to /ak/api/pts/v4. Once encoded, the loader exfiltrates the data via a POST request to the C2 server at /ota/api/tasks/v3. In response, the attackers’ server returns a list of modules for download and execution, as well as a list of APK files to install on the victim’s device. Interestingly, in newer Android versions, the delivery of these APKs is implemented via installation sessions. This is likely an attempt by the malware to bypass restrictions introduced in recent OS versions, which prevent sideloaded apps from accessing sensitive permissions – specifically accessibility services. Unfortunately, during our research, we were unable to obtain samples of the specific modules and APK files downloaded by this loader. However, users online have reported that infected tablets were adding items to marketplace shopping carts without the user’s knowledge. Clicker loader These modules (such as ad60f46e724d88af6bcacb8c269ac3c1) are injected into the following apps: Wallpaper (com.android.wallpaper) YouTube (com.google.android.youtube) Facebook (com.facebook.katana) Digital Wellbeing (com.google.android.apps.wellbeing) System launcher (com.android.launcher3) Upon execution, the malicious module retrieves the device’s location and IP address using a GeoIP service deployed on the attackers’ C2 server. This data, along with the network connection type and OS version, is exfiltrated to the C2. In response, the server returns a specially formatted file containing an encrypted JSON object with payload information, as well as a XOR key for decryption. The structure of this file is described below using pseudocode: The decrypted JSON consists of an array of objects containing download links for the payloads and their respective entry points. An example of such an object is provided below. The payloads themselves are encrypted using the same logic as the JSON. In the course of our research, we obtained several payloads whose primary objective was to interact with advertising elements on various themed websites: gaming, recipes, and news. Each specific module interacts with one particular website whose address is hardcoded into its source. Google Chrome module This module (MD5: 912bc4f756f18049b241934f62bfb06c) targets the Google Chrome browser (com.android.chrome). At the start of its execution, it registers an Activity Lifecycle Callback handler. Whenever an activity is launched within the target app, this handler checks its name. If the name matches the string "ChromeTabbedActivity", the Trojan searches for a text input field (used for search queries and URLs) named url_bar. If the element is found, the malware monitors text changes within it. All search queries entered by the user into the url_bar field are exfiltrated to the attackers’ server. Furthermore, once the user finishes typing a query, the Trojan can hijack the search request and redirect it to a different search engine, depending on the configuration received from the C2 server. It is worth noting that the hijacking attempt may fail if the user selects a query from the autocomplete suggestions; in this scenario, the user does not hit Enter or tap the search button in the url_bar, which would signal the malware to trigger the redirect. However, the attackers anticipated this too. The Trojan attempts to locate the omnibox_suggestions_dropdown element within the current activity, a ViewGroup containing the search suggestions. The malware monitors taps on these suggestions and proceeds to redirect the search engine regardless. The Nova (Phantom) clicker The initial version of this module (MD5: f0184f6955479d631ea4b1ea0f38a35d) was a clicker embedded within the system wallpaper picker (com.android.wallpaper). Researchers at Dr. Web discovered it concurrently with our investigation; however, their report did not mention the clicker’s distribution vector via the Keenadu backdoor. The module utilizes machine learning and WebRTC to interact with advertising elements. While our colleagues at Dr. Web named it Phantom, the C2 server refers to it as Nova. Furthermore, the task executed within the code is named NovaTask. Based on this, we believe the original name of the clicker is Nova. It is also worth noting that shortly after the publication of the report on this clicker, the Keenadu C2 server began deleting it from infected devices. This is likely a strategic move by the attackers to evade further detection. Interestingly, in the unload request, the Nova module appeared under a slightly different name. We believe this new name disguises the latest version of the module, which functions as a loader capable of downloading the following components: The Nova clicker. A Spyware module which exfiltrates various types of victim device information to the attackers’ server. The Gegu SDK dropper. According to our data, this is a multi-stage dropper that launches two additional clickers. Install monetization A module with the MD5 hash 3dae1f297098fa9d9d4ee0335f0aeed3 is embedded into the system launcher (com.android.launcher3). Upon initialization, it runs an environment check for virtual machine artifacts. If none are detected, the malware registers an event handler for session-based app installations. Simultaneously, the module requests a configuration file from the C2 server. An example of this configuration is provided below. When an app installation is initiated on the device, the Trojan transmits data on this app to the C2 server. In response, the server provides information regarding the specific ad used to promote it. For every successfully completed installation session, the Trojan executes GET requests to the URL provided in the tracking_link field in the response, as well as the first link within the click array. Based on the source code, the links in the click array serve as templates into which various advertising identifiers are injected. The attackers most likely use this method to monetize app installations. By simulating traffic from the victim’s device, the Trojan deceives advertising platforms into believing that the app was installed from a legitimate ad tap. Google Play module Even though AKClient shuts down if it is injected into Google Play process, the C2 server have provided us with a payload for it. This module (MD5: 529632abf8246dfe555153de6ae2a9df) retrieves the Google Ads advertising ID and stores it via a global instance of the Settings class under the key S_GA_ID3. Subsequently, other modules may utilize this value as a victim identifier. Other Keenadu distribution vectors During our investigation, we decided to look for alternative sources of Keenadu infections. We discovered that several of the modules described above appeared in attacks that were not linked to the compromise of libandroid_runtime.so. Below are the details of these alternative vectors. System apps According to our telemetry, the Keenadu loader was found within various system apps in the firmware of several devices. One such app (MD5: d840a70f2610b78493c41b1a344b6893) was a face recognition service with the package name com.aiworks.faceidservice. It contains a set of trained machine-learning models used for facial recognition – specifically for authorizing users via Face ID. To facilitate this, the app defines a service named com.aiworks.lock.face.service.FaceLockService, which the system UI (com.android.systemui) utilizes to unlock the device. Within the onCreate method of the com.aiworks.lock.face.service.FaceLockService, triggered upon that service’s creation, three receivers are registered. These receivers monitor screen on/off events, the start of charging, and the availability of network access. Each of these receivers calls the startMars method whose primary purpose is to initialize the malicious loader by calling the init method of the com.hs.client.TEUtils class. The loader is a slightly modified version of the Keenadu loader. This specific variant utilizes a native library libhshelper.so to load modules and facilitate APK installs. To accomplish this, the library defines corresponding native methods within the com.hs.helper.NativeMain class. This specific attack vector – embedding a loader within system apps – is not inherently new. We have previously documented similar cases, such as the Dwphon loader, which was integrated into system apps responsible for OTA updates. However, this marks the first time we have encountered a Trojan embedded within a facial recognition service. In addition to the face recognition service, we identified other system apps infected with the Keenadu loader. These included the launcher app on certain devices (MD5: 382764921919868d810a5cf0391ea193). A malicious service, com.pri.appcenter.service.RemoteService, was embedded into these apps to trigger the Trojan’s execution. We also discovered the Keenadu loader within the app with package name com.tct.contentcenter (MD5: d07eb2db2621c425bda0f046b736e372). This app contains the advertising SDK fwtec, which retrieved its configuration via an HTTP GET request to hxxps://trends.search-hub[.]cn/vuGs8 with default redirection disabled. In response, the Trojan expected a 302 redirect code where the Location header provided an URL containing the SDK configuration within its parameters. One specific parameter, hsby_search_switch, controlled the activation of the Keenadu loader: if its value was set to 1, the loader would initialize within the app. Loading via other backdoors While analyzing our telemetry, we discovered an unusual version of the Keenadu loader (MD5: f53c6ee141df2083e0200a514ba19e32) located in the directories of various apps within external storage, specifically at paths following the pattern: /storage/emulated/0/Android/data/%PACKAGE%/files/.dx/. Based on the code analysis, this loader was designed to operate within a system where the system_server process had already been compromised. Notably, the binder interface names used in this version differed from those used by AKServer. The loader utilized the following interfaces: com.androidextlib.sloth.api.IPServiceM com.androidextlib.sloth.api.IPermissionsM These same binder interfaces are defined by another backdoor that is structured similarly and was also discovered within libandroid_runtime.so. The execution of this other backdoor on infected devices proceeds as follows: libandroid_runtime.so imports a malicious function __android_log_check_loggable from the liblog.so library (MD5: 3d185f30b00270e7e30fc4e29a68237f). This function is called within the implementation of the println_native native method of the android.util.Log class. It decrypts a payload embedded in the library’s body using a single-byte XOR and executes it within the context of all apps on the device. The payload shares many similarities with BADBOX, a comprehensive malware platform first described by researchers at HUMAN Security. Specifically, the C2 server paths used for the Trojan’s HTTP requests are a match. This leads us to believe that this is a specific variant of BADBOX. Within this backdoor, we also discovered the binder interfaces utilized by the aforementioned Keenadu loader. This suggests that those specific instances of Keenadu were deployed directly by BADBOX. Modifications of popular apps Unfortunately, even if your firmware does not contain Keenadu or another pre-installed backdoor, the Trojan still poses a threat to you. The Nova (Phantom) clicker was discovered by researchers at Dr. Web around the same time as we held our investigation. Their findings highlight a different distribution vector: modified versions of popular software distributed primarily through unofficial sources, as well as various apps found in the GetApps store. Google Play Infected apps have managed to infiltrate Google Play too. During our research, we identified trojanized software for smart cameras published on the official Android app store. Collectively, these apps had been downloaded more than 300,000 times. Each of these apps contained an embedded service named com.arcsoft.closeli.service.KucopdInitService, which launched the aforementioned Nova clicker. We alerted Google to the presence of the infected apps in its store, and they removed the malware. Curiously, while the malicious service was present in all identified apps, it was configured to execute only in one specific package: com.taismart.global. The Fantastic Four: how Triada, BADBOX, Vo1d, and Keenadu are connected After discovering that BADBOX downloads one of the Keenadu modules, we decided to conduct further research to determine if there were any other signs of a connection between these Trojans. As a result, we found that BADBOX and Keenadu shared similarities in the payload code that was decrypted and executed by the malicious code in libandroid_runtime.so. We also identified similarities between the Keenadu loader and the BB2DOOR module of the BADBOX Trojan. Given that there are also distinct differences in the code, and considering that BADBOX was downloading the Keenadu loader, we believe these are separate botnets, and the developers of Keenadu likely found inspiration in the BADBOX source code. Furthermore, the authors of Keenadu appear to target Android tablets primarily. In our recent report on the Triada backdoor, we mentioned that the C2 server for one of its downloaded modules was hosted on the same domain as one of the Vo1d botnet’s servers, which could suggest a link between those two Trojans. However, during the current investigation, we managed to uncover a connection between Triada and the BADBOX botnet as well. As it turns out, the directories where BADBOX downloaded the Keenadu loader also contained other payloads for various apps. Their description warrants a separate report; for the sake of brevity, we will not delve into the details here, limiting ourselves to the analysis of a payload for the Telegram and Instagram clients (MD5: 8900f5737e92a69712481d7a809fcfaa). The entry point for this payload is the com.extlib.apps.InsTGEnter class. The payload is designed to steal victims’ account credentials in the infected services. Interestingly, it also contains code for stealing credentials from the WhatsApp client, though it is currently not utilized. The C2 server addresses used by the Trojan to exfiltrate device data are stored in the code in an encrypted format. They are first decoded using Base64 and then decrypted via a XOR operation with the string "xiwljfowkgs". After decrypting the C2 addresses, we discovered the domain zcnewy[.]com, which we had previously identified in 2022 during our investigation of malicious WhatsApp mods containing Triada. At that time, we assumed that the code segment responsible for stealing WhatsApp credentials and the malicious dropper both belonged to Triada. However, since we have now established that zcnewy[.]com is linked to BADBOX, we believe that the infected WhatsApp modifications we described in 2022 actually contained two distinct Trojans: Triada and BADBOX. To verify this hypothesis, we re-examined one of those modifications (MD5: caa640824b0e216fab86402b14447953) and confirmed that it contained the code for both the Triada dropper and a BADBOX module functionally similar to the one described above. Although the Trojans were launched from the same entry point, they did not interact with each other and were structured in entirely different ways. Based on this, we conclude that what we observed in 2022 was a joint attack by the BADBOX and Triada operators. These findings show that several of the largest Android botnets are interacting with one another. Currently, we have confirmed links between Triada, Vo1d, and BADBOX, as well as the connection between Keenadu and BADBOX. Researchers at HUMAN Security have also previously reported a connection between Vo1d and BADBOX. It is important to emphasize that these connections are not necessarily transitive. For example, the fact that both Triada and Keenadu are linked to BADBOX does not automatically imply that Triada and Keenadu are directly connected; such a claim would require separate evidence. However, given the current landscape, we would not be surprised if future reports provide the evidence needed to prove the transitivity of these relationships. Victims According to our telemetry, 13,715 users worldwide have encountered Keenadu or its modules. Our security solutions recorded the highest number of users attacked by the malware in Russia, Japan, Germany, Brazil and the Netherlands. Recommendations Our technical support team is often asked what steps should be taken if a security solution detects Keenadu on a device. In this section, we examine all possible scenarios for combating this Trojan. If the libandroid_runtime.so library is infected Modern versions of Android mount the system partition, which contains libandroid_runtime.so, as read-only. Even if one were to theoretically assume the possibility of editing this partition, the infected libandroid_runtime.so library cannot be removed without damaging the firmware: the device would simply cease to boot. Therefore, it is impossible to eliminate the threat using standard Android OS tools. Operating a device infected with the Keenadu backdoor can involve significant inconveniences. Reviews of infected devices complain about intrusive ads and various mysterious sounds whose source cannot be identified. If you encounter the Keenadu backdoor, we recommend the following: Check for software updates. It is possible that a clean firmware version has already been released for your device. After updating, use a reliable security solution to verify that the issue has been resolved. If a clean firmware update from the manufacturer does not exist for your device, you can attempt to install a clean firmware yourself. However, it is important to remember that manually flashing a device can brick it. Until the firmware is replaced or updated, we recommend that you stop using the infected device. If one of the system apps is infected Unfortunately, as in the previous case, it is not possible to remove such an app from the device because it is located in the system partition. If you encounter the Keenadu loader in a system app, our recommendations are: Find a replacement for the app, if applicable. For example, if the launcher app is infected, you can download any alternative that does not contain malware. If no alternatives exist for the app – for example, if the face recognition service is infected – we recommend avoiding the use of that specific functionality whenever possible. Disable the infected app using ADB if an alternative has been found or you don’t really need it. This can be done with the command adb shell pm disable --user 0 %PACKAGE% . If an infected app has been installed on the device This is one of the simplest cases of infection. If a security solution has detected an app infected with Keenadu on your device, simply uninstall it following the instructions the solution provides. Conclusion Developers of pre-installed backdoors in Android device firmware have always stood out for their high level of expertise. This is still true for Keenadu: the creators of the malware have a deep understanding of the Android architecture, the app startup process, and the core security principles of the operating system. During the investigation, we were surprised by the scope of the Keenadu campaigns: beyond the primary backdoor in firmware, its modules were found in system apps and even in apps from Google Play. This places the Trojan on the same scale as threats like Triada or BADBOX. The emergence of a new pre-installed backdoor of this magnitude indicates that this category of malware is a distinct market with significant competition. Keenadu is a large-scale, complex malware platform that provides attackers with unrestricted control over the victim’s device. Although we have currently shown that the backdoor is used primarily for various types of ad fraud, we do not rule out that in the future, the malware may follow in Triada’s footsteps and begin stealing credentials. Indicators of compromise Additional IoCs, technical details and a YARA rule for detecting Keenadu activity are available to customers of our Threat Intelligence Reporting service. For more details, contact us at [email protected].
securelist.comFeb 17, 2026extracted
Zumigo enhances fraud prevention with low-code tools and passwordless authentication
Zumigo enhances fraud prevention with low-code tools and passwordless authentication Zumigo has upgraded its solutions designed to help businesses fortify their defenses against rising sophisticated consumer fraud with an identity-first security approach. Recognizing that consumer and user access points are often exploited for fraud and attacks, Zumigo has evolved its technology to boost accessibility, simplicity, and accuracy to facilitate widespread adoption of seamless verification and authentication workflows. Businesses can thus prevent fraud, improve conversion and retain legitimate customers at the same time. 1. Accessibility: In addition to traditional API integration, Zumigo is rolling out a low-code/no-code platform that allows businesses to visually create and customize their own verification and authentication workflows. This visual interface uses a menu of services, giving non-developers instant control over their identity logic. The platform includes a centralized dashboard featuring key verification metrics, event logs, device fingerprinting intelligence, support, and billing—putting all necessary tools at the user’s fingertips. 2. Simplicity: Following its mission to simplify the consumer journey and reduce friction, Zumigo is debuting new passwordless authentication methods. These options include sign-in via social credentials and leveraging SIM-based authentication from major U.S. mobile network operators (MNOs) including T-Mobile. SIM-based authentication offers a superior, ubiquitous, consumer-centric solution that can easily integrate with existing tools and effectively replace vulnerable one-time passcodes (OTPs). This technology also amplifies the mobile form pre-fill solution so that businesses can improve conversion and increase verified leads in their onboarding or pre-approval workflows. 3. Accuracy: Zumigo is adding additional layers of multi-dimensional risk assessment across various identity artifacts to increase the precision of digital identity risk assessment, including device fingerprinting; and augmented phone trust score with risk indicators for spoofing, known fraud, blacklisting, phone activity across networks, and other signals. These enhancements integrate more robust data signals and predictive models to significantly improve the accuracy of the identity risk scoring, helping businesses better identify and stop complex threats like synthetic identity fraud. “Today, cybercriminals no longer need to hack networks—they hack people and their credentials instead,” said Chirag Bakshi, Zumigo CEO. “Every day, millions of vulnerabilities arise through compromised emails, stolen accounts, and synthetic identity schemes that traditional security tools simply cannot detect. Our mission is to strengthen the digital identity perimeter together with our partners, making our solution easier to deploy and use, while drastically increasing the accuracy of our risk assessments to close those critical vulnerabilities.” “API-based authentication can give users and businesses real-time identity verification, which makes the entire process seamless,” said Dan Thygesen, SVP T-Mobile Product, Partnerships & Growth and Head of Wholesale & Innovation. “By shifting to a passwordless approach to authentication, T-Mobile is giving aggregators like Zumigo the ability to deliver stronger security and higher trust.”
helpnetsecurity.comOct 27, 2025extracted
Satellites leak voice calls, text messages and more
Scientists from several US universities intercepted unencrypted broadcast through geostationary satellites using only off-the-shelf equipment on a university rooftop. Geostationary satellites move at the same speed as the Earth’s rotation so it seems as though they are always above the same exact location. To maintain this position, they orbit at an altitude of roughly 22,000 miles (36,000 kilometers). This makes them ideal for relaying phone calls, text messages, and internet data. Since these satellites can cover vast areas—including remote and hard-to-reach areas—they provide reliable connectivity for everything from rural cell towers to airplanes and ships, even where cables don’t reach. That same stability makes them convenient for people who want to eavesdrop, because you only need to point your equipment once. The researchers who did this described their findings in a paper called “Don’t Look Up: There Are Sensitive Internal Links in the Clear on GEO Satellites.” The team scanned the IP traffic on 39 GEO satellites across 25 distinct longitudes with 411 transponders using consumer-grade equipment. About half of the signals they captured contained clear text IP traffic. This means there was no encryption at either the link layer or the network layer. This allowed the team to observe internal communications from organizations that rely on these satellites to connect remote critical infrastructure and field operations. Among the intercepted data were private voice calls, text messages, and call metadata sent through cellular backhaul—the data that travels between cell towers and the central network. Commercial and retail organizations transmitted inventory records, internal communications, and business data over these satellite links. Banks leaked ATM-related transactions and network management commands. Entertainment and aviation communications were also intercepted, including in-flight entertainment audio and aircraft data. The researchers also captured industrial control signals for utility infrastructure, including job scheduling and grid monitoring commands. Military (from the US and Mexico) communications were exposed, revealing asset tracking information and operational details such as surveillance data for vessel movements. The research reveals a pervasive lack of standardized encryption protocols, leaving much of this traffic vulnerable to interception by any technically capable individual with suitable equipment. They concluded that despite the sensitive nature of the data, satellite communication security is often neglected, creating substantial opportunities for eavesdropping, espionage, and potential misuse. The researchers stated: “There is a clear mismatch between how satellite customers expect data to be secured and how it is secured in practice; the severity of the vulnerabilities we discovered has certainly revised our own threat models for communications.” After the scientists reported their findings, T-Mobile took steps to address the issue, but other unnamed providers have yet to patch the vulnerabilities. This study highlights the importance of making sure your communications are encrypted before they leave your devices. Do not rely solely on providers to keep your data safe. Use secure communication apps like Signal or WhatsApp, choose voice-over-internet (VoIP) providers that encrypt calls and messages, and protect your internet data with a VPN that creates a secure, encrypted tunnel. Browse like no one’s watching. Malwarebytes Privacy VPN encrypts your connection and never logs what you do, so the next story you read doesn’t have to feel personal. Try it free →
malwarebytes.comOct 15, 2025extracted
Red Hat confirms security incident after hackers claim GitHub breach
Correction: After publishing, Red Hat confirmed that it was a breach of one of its GitLab instances, and not GitHub. Title and story updated. An extortion group calling itself the Crimson Collective claims to have stolen nearly 570GB of compressed data across 28,000 internal development respositories belonging to Red Hat, with the company confirming it was a breach of one of its GitLab instances. This data allegedly includes approximately 800 Customer Engagement Reports (CERs), which can contain sensitive information about a customer's network and platforms. A CER is a consulting document prepared for clients that often contains infrastructure details, configuration data, authentication tokens, and other information that could be abused to breach customer networks. Red Hat confirmed that it suffered a security incident related to its consulting business, but would not verify any of the attacker's claims regarding the stolen GitLab repositories and customer CERs. "Red Hat is aware of reports regarding a security incident related to our consulting business and we have initiated necessary remediation steps," Red Hat told BleepingComputer. "The security and integrity of our systems and the data entrusted to us are our highest priority. At this time, we have no reason to believe the security issue impacts any of our other Red Hat services or products and are highly confident in the integrity of our software supply chain." After publishing our story, Red Hat confirmed that the security incident was a breach of its GitLab instance used solely for Red Hat Consulting on consulting engagements, and not GitHub. While Red Hat did not respond to any further questions about the breach, the hackers told BleepingComputer that the intrusion occurred approximately two weeks ago. They allegedly found authentication tokens, full database URIs, and other private information in Red Hat code and CERs, which they claimed to use to gain access to downstream customer infrastructure. The hacking group also published a complete directory listing of the allegedly stolen GitLab repositories and a list of CERs from 2020 through 2025 on Telegram. The directory listing of CERs include a wide range of sectors and well known organizations such as Bank of America, T-Mobile, AT&T, Fidelity, Kaiser, Mayo Clinic, Walmart, Costco, the U.S. Navy’s Naval Surface Warfare Center, Federal Aviation Administration, the House of Representatives, and many others. If you have any information regarding this incident or any other undisclosed attacks, you can contact us confidentially via Signal at 646-961-3731 or at [email protected]. The hackers stated that they attempted to contact Red Hat with an extortion demand but received no response other than a templated reply instructing them to submit a vulnerability report to their security team. According to them, the created ticket was repeatedly assigned to additional people, including Red Hat's legal and security staff members. BleepingComputer sent Red Hat additional questions, and we will update this story if we receive more information. The same group also claimed responsibility for briefly defacing Nintendo’s topic page last week to include contact information and links to their Telegram channel. Red Hat releases more details Following our story, Red Hat published a "security update" confirming that threat actors gained access to a GitLab instance used by its Consulting division. "We recently detected unauthorized access to a GitLab instance used for internal Red Hat Consulting collaboration in select engagements," reads the Red Hat security update. "Upon detection, we promptly launched a thorough investigation, removed the unauthorized party's access, isolated the instance, and contacted the appropriate authorities. Our investigation, which is ongoing, found that an unauthorized third party had accessed and copied some data from this instance." "We have now implemented additional hardening measures designed to help prevent further access and contain the issue." Red Hat emphasized that the GitLab instance is only used by its consulting division and the breach does not impact other Red Hat products or its supply chain, including software downloaded from official channels. The company confirmed that the instance contained consulting engagement reports (CERs), which may include project specifications, example code snippets, and internal communications related to consulting services. However, Red Hat states that these reports typically do not contain personal information, and none have been found during the investigation. The company is now contacting impacted customers to share further information on what may have been exposed. Separately, GitLab informed BleepingComputer that its platform or accounts were not compromised, emphasizing that the incident only affected Red Hat's self-managed instance of GitLab Community Edition and that customers are responsible for securing these installations. Update 10/2/25: Story updated with correction from Red Hat that it was a GitLab instance that was breached and not a GitHub account. Update 10/2/25: Added information from Red Hat's official statement. Overall prevention scores can hide what happens after initial access. Once attackers are using valid credentials, prevention drops sharply. The Blue Report 2026 measures defenses technique by technique across 338 million simulations run in customer production environments. Get the report
bleepingcomputer.comOct 2, 2025extracted
Cloudflare mitigates new record-breaking 22.2 Tbps DDoS attack
Cloudflare has mitigated a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack that peaked at a record-breaking 22.2 terabits per second (Tbps) and 10.6 billion packets per second (Bpps). DDoS attacks typically exhaust either system or network resources, aiming to make services slow or unavailable to legitimate users. Record-breaking DDoS attacks are becoming more frequent, as just three weeks ago, Cloudflare disclosed that it mitigated a massive 11.5 Tbps and 5.1 Bpps attack, the largest publicly announced at the time. Two months before that, the company dealt with another ecord attack that peaked at 7.3 Tbps. In April, the internet giant warned that it was dealing with a record number of DDoS attacks this year. The latest DDoS incident, also volumentric, lasted 40 seconds and is by far the largest ever mitigated. Despite the short assault period, the volume of traffic directed at the victim was enormous, roughly equivalent to streaming one million 4K videos simultaneously. The packet rate of 10.6 Bpps can be translated to roughly 1.3 web page refreshes per second from every person on the planet. The large volume of packets makes it particularly difficult for firewalls, routers, and load balancers to process the requests, even if the total bandwidth is manageable. Although Cloudflare has not shared many details about the last two DDoS attacks, XLab research division at Chinese cybersecurity company Qi'anxin attributed an 11.5 Tb DDoS attack to the AISURU botnet. According to the researchers, AISURU has infected more than 300,000 devices worldwide, with a sudden increase occuring in April 2025 after the compromise of a Totolink router firmware update server. The botnet also targets vulnerabilities in IP cameras, DVRs/NVRs, Realtek chips, and routers from T-Mobile, Zyxel, D-Link, and Linksys. Overall prevention scores can hide what happens after initial access. Once attackers are using valid credentials, prevention drops sharply. The Blue Report 2026 measures defenses technique by technique across 338 million simulations run in customer production environments. Get the report
bleepingcomputer.comSep 23, 2025extracted
FCC’s data breach reporting rules for telecoms are upheld in appeals court
FCC’s data breach reporting rules for telecoms are upheld in appeals court The Federal Communications Commission’s regulations requiring telecom companies to report breaches of customers’ personally identifiable information (PII) have survived a court challenge. A federal appeals court panel voted 2-1 on Wednesday against a petition from industry groups, who argued that the 2024 rules exceeded the FCC’s statutory authority. Under the regulations, telecom companies must report breaches involving 500 or more customers’ PII within seven business days. The rules, approved in December 2023 and imposed in March 2024, represented the first update to the agency’s data breach reporting requirements in 16 years. Previous regulations covered breaches of data such as call records or billing information — also known as customer proprietary network information” (CPNI) — but the update added PII such as Social Security numbers and email addresses. Multiple trade associations had asked federal judges to block the new rules, and many of those cases were consolidated into the petition in the Ohio-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. “We have determined that the FCC has the statutory authority to impose the 2024 data breach reporting rule on telecommunications carriers,” the majority judges said in their opinion. They also determined that the regulations did not violate the Congressional Review Act, which lawmakers had used to reject similar rules in 2017. Several high-profile telecom company data breaches have led to settlements with the FCC in recent years. T-Mobile agreed to pay $31.5 million and overhaul its cybersecurity practices after a series of incidents dating back to 2021. AT&T paid $13.3 million after a breach at one of its cloud vendors. And Verizon-owned TracFone settled for $16 million after the agency alleged the company had failed to safeguard customer data. Joe Warminsky has been the news editor for Recorded Future News since 2022. He has three decades of experience as an editor and writer in the Washington, D.C., area. He previously he helped lead CyberScoop for more than five years. Prior to that, he was a digital editor at WAMU 88.5, the NPR affiliate in Washington, and he spent more than a decade editing coverage of Congress for CQ Roll Call.
therecord.mediaAug 14, 2025extracted
Hackers leak Allianz Life data stolen in Salesforce attacks
Hackers have released stolen data belonging to US insurance giant Allianz Life, exposing 2.8 million records with sensitive information on business partners and customers in ongoing Salesforce data theft attacks. Last month, Allianz Life disclosed that it suffered a data breach when the personal information for the "majority" of its 1.4 million customers was stolen from a third-party, cloud-based CRM system on July 16th. While the company did not name the provider, BleepingComputer first reported the incident was part of a wave of Salesforce-targeted thefts carried out by the ShinyHunters extortion group. Over the weekend, ShinyHunters and other threat actors claiming overlap with "Scattered Spider" and "Lapsus$" created a Telegram channel called "ScatteredLapsuSp1d3rHunters" to taunt cybersecurity researchers, law enforcement, and journalists while taking credit for a string of high-profile breaches. Many of these attacks had not previously been attributed to any threat actor, including the attacks on Internet Archive, Pearson, and Coinbase. One of the attacks claimed by the threat actors is Allianz Life, for which they proceeded to leak the complete databases that were stolen from the company's Salesforce instances. These files consist of the Salesforce "Accounts" and "Contacts" database tables, containing approximately 2.8 million data records for individual customers and business partners, such as wealth management companies, brokers, and financial advisors. The leaked Salesforce data includes sensitive personal information, such as names, addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, and Tax Identification Numbers, as well as professional details like licenses, firm affiliations, product approvals, and marketing classifications. BleepingComputer has been able to confirm with multiple people that their data in the leaked files is accurate, including their phone numbers, email addresses, tax IDs, and other information contained in the database. BleepingComputer contacted Allianz Life about the leaked database but was told that they could not comment as the investigation is ongoing. The Salesforce data-theft attacks The Salesforce data theft attacks are believed to have started at the beginning of the year, with the threat actors conducting social engineering attacks to trick employees into linking a malicious OAuth app with their company's Salesforce instances. Once linked, the threat actors used the connection to download and steal the databases, which were then used to extort the company through email. Extortion demands were sent to the companies via email and were signed as coming from ShinyHunters. This notorious extortion group has been linked to many high-profile attacks over the years, including those against AT&T, PowerSchool, and the SnowFlake attacks. While ShinyHunters is known to target cloud SaaS applications and website databases, they are not known for these types of social engineering attacks, causing many researchers and the media to attribute some of the Salesforce attacks to Scattered Spider. However, ShinyHunters told BleepingComputer the "ShinyHunters" group and "Scattered Spider" are now one and the same. "Like we have said repeatedly already, ShinyHunters and Scattered Spider are one and the same," ShinyHunters told BleepingComputer. "They provide us with initial access and we conduct the dump and exfiltration of the Salesforce CRM instances. Just like we did with Snowflake." It is also believed that many of the group's members share their roots in another hacking group known as Lapsus$, which was responsible for numerous attacks in 2022-2023, before some of their members were arrested. Lapsus$ was behind breaches at Rockstar Games, Uber, 2K, Okta, T-Mobile, Microsoft, Ubisoft, and NVIDIA. Like Scattered Spider, Lapsus$ was also adept at social engineering attacks and SIM swap attacks, allowing them to run over billion and trillion-dollar companies' IT defenses. Over the past couple of years, there have been many arrests linked to all three collectives, so it's not clear if the current threat actors are old threat actors, new ones who have picked up the mantle, or are simply utilizing these names to plant false flags. Overall prevention scores can hide what happens after initial access. Once attackers are using valid credentials, prevention drops sharply. The Blue Report 2026 measures defenses technique by technique across 338 million simulations run in customer production environments. Get the report
bleepingcomputer.comAug 12, 2025extracted
New HTTP Request Smuggling Attacks Impacted CDNs, Major Orgs, Millions of Websites
New variants of the HTTP request smuggling attack method impacted several widely used content delivery networks, major organizations, and millions of websites. James Kettle, director of research at application security firm PortSwigger, presented a new attack method on Wednesday at the Black Hat conference. Kettle has worked with several others, including a team of bug bounty hunters, to find impacted organizations and inform them about the risks. HTTP request smuggling, also referred to as a desync attack, leverages inconsistencies in how web servers process HTTP requests, enabling an attacker to ‘smuggle’ a malicious request inside a legitimate one. The issue is related to how servers — typically frontend servers that act as load balancers or proxies, and backend servers that host a website — determine where an HTTP request ends and where the next request begins. Threat actors can create a specially crafted request that is forwarded by the frontend server to the backend server, with the backend server being tricked into believing that the request has a smaller length than it actually does, leaving the leftover part of the request in the connection buffer and appending it to the next request. The attacker can craft the request to ensure that a malicious part is left in the connection buffer and appended to a request initiated by a legitimate user right after the attacker. The attacker’s request can be designed to steal the victim’s session, redirect the victim to a fake (phishing) website, or poison the web cache and cause the server to store a malicious page that is served to other users. The existence of HTTP request smuggling has been known for more than two decades, and at least half a dozen new variations have been found since 2016. A new variant discovered by Kettle leverages weaknesses in HTTP/1.1 and involves an attack method named 0.CL (a variation of CL.0). Kettle and the other researchers identified many impacted servers, including a non-production T-Mobile server (T-Mobile paid out a $12,000 bug bounty), a GitLab server that exposed reports sent to its bug bounty program (a $7,000 bug bounty was paid), and Netlify CDN systems. However they soon realized that many of the targets were using Akamai’s CDN. Further analysis showed that indeed the root cause was a vulnerability in Akamai’s infrastructure. The company assigned the issue CVE-2025-32094 and quickly started working on addressing it. Akamai paid out a $9,000 bug bounty and on Wednesday published a blog post sharing technical details. According to Kettle, the attack enabled mass compromise of user credentials from almost every company using Akamai, including tech giants, US government organizations, and SaaS providers. Cloudflare was also impacted, but by a different HTTP request smuggling attack involving HTTP/1.1 weaknesses. In the case of the internet security and performance giant, researchers found that they could redirect the visitors of the millions of websites protected by Cloudflare to a site they controlled. Cloudflare rushed to address the issue and paid out a $7,000 bug bounty. The company also published a blog post detailing the issue and how it was resolved. Overall, the researchers reported their findings to dozens of companies and they received bug bounties totaling $276,000. Kettle, who published a blog post on Wednesday to detail the findings, urged the industry to move away from HTTP/1.1 to HTTP/2+, which addresses the weaknesses that enable such attacks. Related: Adobe Issues Out-of-Band Patches for AEM Forms Vulnerabilities With Public PoC Related: Trend Micro Warns of Apex One Vulnerabilities Exploited in Wild
securityweek.comAug 7, 2025extracted