Search/sierra wireless
● Vendor

sierra wireless

Known CVEs
0
Highest CVSS
—
In KEV
0
Vendor
sierra wireless aircard 760s
Connections
12 relationships
Plug and Pwn attack uses fake USB devices for Windows SYSTEM access
Security researchers have disclosed new "Plug and Pwn" attacks that abuse the Windows Plug and Play feature to trigger Windows into installing vulnerable or insecure vendor software and gain SYSTEM privileges. The research, presented at DEF CON 34 by security researchers Alejandro Hernando and Borja Martínez, exploits how Windows automatically identifies new connected hardware, locates matching driver packages, and installs vendor software as the NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM account. By using software to emulate USB devices, the researchers found they could force Windows to install signed vendor packages containing exploitable components or weaknesses that can be abused to gain SYSTEM privileges. Some of the demonstrated attacks require no user interaction or logged-in user, while another can be performed remotely over RDP without any physical USB hardware being connected to the targeted computer. plugandpwn.com. Abusing Windows Plug and Play Windows supports a feature called co-installers, which automatically downloads and installs vendor software and drivers when a new USB device is inserted into a computer. In 2021, BleepingComputer reported on how this feature was abused along with a Razer Synapse vulnerability to give a standard Windows user SYSTEM privileges simply by plugging in a Razer mouse or keyboard. When a Razer device was connected, Windows automatically downloaded and launched the Razer Synapse installer with SYSTEM privileges. A flaw in the installer allowed a standard user to launch PowerShell from the installation interface, causing the shell to inherit the installer's privileges. BleepingComputer tested the vulnerability at the time and confirmed that it could be used to gain SYSTEM privileges in approximately two minutes. At the time, vulnerability analyst Will Dormann previously warned that similar vulnerabilities were likely present in other software automatically installed through Windows Plug and Play. Hernando told BleepingComputer that Plug and Pwn belongs to the same family of attacks, but the new research focuses more on the Windows device installation path itself. "The Razer bug is the same family. The difference is that we went after the install path itself instead of one vendor's installer," Hernando told BleepingComputer. "Some of our chains need no clicks and no logged-on session, and one of them runs over RDP with no hardware at all." The researchers say the main issue is that when Windows detects new hardware, it may automatically retrieve an associated signed package and execute vendor-supplied components as SYSTEM. This privileged installation path can include co-installers, services, support executables, and drivers, with no UAC prompt displayed by the operating system. From fake USB devices to remote RDP attacks The researchers told BleepingComputer that they used FaceDancer with Cynthion and GreatFET hardware connected to a small Linux computer to emulate USB devices. FaceDancer is a software framework for emulating USB devices, allowing researchers to define the descriptors, interfaces, device classes, and endpoints that a computer uses to identify connected devices. Connecting hardware running FaceDancer to a computer can make the operating system behave as though a specific USB device had been plugged in. Using FaceDancer, the researchers could make their hardware appear to Windows as specific USB devices, causing the operating system to recognize the emulated hardware and locate and install the associated vendor driver packages. Some attack chains also require the emulated device to disconnect and then reappear as a different device identity. "Several of our chains depend on presenting the device as composite so Windows loads usbccgp.sys and enumerates each interface on its own, which is what makes it match the vendor package instead of the inbox driver," Hernando explained to BleepingComputer. "We also need to re-enumerate on demand, dropping the device and coming back as a different identity." In their zero-click physical demonstration, the researchers exploited behavior in Sierra Wireless and Sony FeliCa installation packages. The attack first impersonates a Sierra Wireless device, causing Windows to install software that can be abused to change the computer's DNS settings. The researchers then impersonate a Sony FeliCa device, which causes Windows to install additional Sony software that downloads files over an unencrypted connection. By controlling the system's DNS settings, the researchers can redirect those downloads to a server they control and exploit a flaw in the Sony software to place a malicious file on the system with SYSTEM privileges. Finally, they impersonate the Sierra device again, causing Windows to load the malicious file and allow the attackers to open a reverse shell with SYSTEM privileges. The researchers demonstrated this chain against a fully updated Windows 11 computer with nobody logged in, saying the complete attack takes approximately five minutes. When questioned if this attack can be conducted with small portable devices, Hernando said their research hardware is already portable enough to carry around and that a Raspberry Pi operating in USB gadget mode should theoretically be capable of conducting this attack as well. However, he said the Flipper Zero cannot currently perform the FaceDancer attacks. "Flipper Zero, no. There's no FaceDancer backend for it and the framework won't run on it," Hernando said. "Its BadUSB mode is fine for HID, but arbitrary composite descriptors and re-enumeration would be a firmware project." The researchers also demonstrated what they call "NoPlug & Pwn," which requires no physical hardware emulation. Instead, the attack abuses RDP USB redirection, a feature that allows USB devices attached to a user's local computer to be available inside a remote Windows session. Rather than redirecting an actual device, the researchers created a Python RDP client that sends specific USB descriptors over this USB redirection feature when connecting over RDP. The remote Windows host then treats the fake descriptors as a legitimate USB device connected to the guest computer, creates the corresponding Plug and Play device on the host, causing the corresponding drivers and vendor software to be installed. In the researchers' demonstration, they impersonated an Intel RealSense camera whose Windows Update package contains a co-installer that can be abused through DLL hijacking to obtain SYSTEM privileges. "The server's USB hub driver enumerates our phantom device, and Windows PnP does exactly what it did in the physical demo: it matches the hardware ID and installs the driver, as SYSTEM," the researchers explain on the Plug and Pwn site. The RDP attack only works on systems where USB redirection is enabled, which Hernando says is common in virtual desktop environments. Disabling co-installers helps, but does not stop Plug and Pwn Will Dormann suggested that Windows administrators concerned about this type of attack can enable the 'DisableCoInstallers' registry value, which prevents driver packages from executing co-installers during device installation. To do this, open the Registry Editor and navigate to the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Device Installer Registry key. Under that key, add a DWORD-32 value named DisableCoInstallers and set it to 1, as shown below. When BleepingComputer asked whether this would effectively block Plug and Pwn, Hernando said it would disrupt some of the demonstrated attacks, including the Sony FeliCa attack and the Intel RealSense RDP attack. However, it does not eliminate the underlying attack surface. "It helps, and it would break parts of what we showed," Hernando told BleepingComputer. "It doesn't stop the class of attack, though. It leaves PnP enumeration, Windows Update resolution, driver staging, INF processing and INF-installed services untouched." The researchers illustrated this with another attack using Wacom and Atheros packages that exploits a vulnerability (CVE-2019-10617) in an Atheros driver service installed through an INF file rather than a co-installer. Hernando recommends that organizations with sensitive systems use 'DisableCoInstallers' along with additional device blocking. "In anything sensitive I'd pair it with device installation restrictions or hardware-ID allow-lists, and turn off PnP device redirection on RDP and VDI hosts that don't need it (fDisablePNPRedir)," Hernando told BleepingComputer. The researchers have not reported all of the attack scenarios as new vulnerabilities to individual vendors, saying that many are not standalone security flaws and only become exploitable when combined with other functionality. Overall prevention scores can hide what happens after initial access. Once attackers are using valid credentials, prevention drops sharply. The Blue Report 2026 measures defenses technique by technique across 338 million simulations run in customer production environments. Get the report
bleepingcomputer.comAug 12, 2026extracted
Researchers Turn USB Auto-Install Into a Full SYSTEM Takeover on Windows 11
Windows Plug and Play can be abused to fetch signed vendor software for an emulated USB device and execute privileged installation components that researchers chained to SYSTEM access on a fully updated Windows 11 machine. The same PnP path can be triggered over Remote Desktop without physical hardware when supported Plug and Play or low-level USB redirection is enabled; Microsoft says that redirection is not allowed by default. Security researchers Alejandro Hernando and Borja Martinez described the technique in "Plug And Pwn: Weaponizing Windows PnP Auto-Install," research prepared for DEF CON 34. They built tooling to emulate arbitrary USB devices and said that, under the required conditions, an unprivileged user can turn the PnP installation path into SYSTEM code execution. Microsoft's own driver documentation describes the underlying selection step: Windows receives hardware and compatible IDs for a device and uses them to find a matching driver package. According to the researchers, the physical chain starts by emulating a Sierra Wireless device so Windows installs SwiService.exe, a SYSTEM service exposing a SetDNS primitive. They use it to redirect DNS, then emulate a Sony FeliCa reader whose co-installer retrieves configuration files over plaintext HTTP and derives local filenames from URL paths. The researchers say a path-traversal flaw lets them place a DLL in System32; reconnecting the Sierra device then loads the planted DLL and yields SYSTEM. Their disclosed demonstration used a fully updated Windows 11 system, so the result should not be generalized to an untested Windows version range. The remote variant replaces the physical device with synthetic USB traffic over RDP. The researchers' Python client forges a USB identity and presents a phantom Intel RealSense device, causing Windows to follow the redirected device-installation path. They say the resulting RealSense software can be abused through a CRYPTBASE.dll search-order hijack from a user-writable installation directory, giving the authenticated low-privilege user SYSTEM code execution. Microsoft separately documents that redirected low-level USB peripherals use the same driver-installation process as a physical Windows computer. The remote path is configuration-dependent, not a default Windows exposure. Microsoft says Remote Desktop Services does not allow supported Plug and Play and RemoteFX USB redirection by default, and its USB-redirection guidance requires Plug and Play redirection to be enabled before low-level USB forwarding works. Administrators that do not need the feature can leave it disabled. Microsoft also provides device-installation restrictions that can allow or block devices by hardware or compatible ID, device-instance ID, and setup class; on a Remote Desktop server, those policies can also affect redirected devices. The physical chain has its own precondition: an attacker has to be able to present an emulated USB device to the target machine. The research demonstrates abuse of a legitimate privileged installation path combined with weaknesses in signed third-party packages. The vendor-specific Sierra, Sony, and Intel exploit mechanics remain researcher findings and should stay attributed unless matching vendor material independently confirms them.
thehackernews.comAug 11, 2026extracted
Dell RecoverPoint for VMs Zero-Day CVE-2026-22769 Exploited Since Mid-2024
A maximum severity security vulnerability in Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines has been exploited as a zero-day by a suspected China-nexus threat cluster dubbed UNC6201 since mid-2024, according to a new report from Google Mandiant and Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG). The activity involves the exploitation of CVE-2026-22769 (CVSS score: 10.0), a case of hard-coded credentials affecting versions prior to 6.0.3.1 HF1. Other products, including RecoverPoint Classic, are not vulnerable to the flaw. "This is considered critical as an unauthenticated remote attacker with knowledge of the hardcoded credential could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized access to the underlying operating system and root-level persistence," Dell said in a bulletin released Tuesday. The issue impacts the following products - RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Version 5.3 SP4 P1 - Migrate from RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines 5.3 SP4 P1 to 6.0 SP3, and then upgrade to 6.0.3.1 HF1 RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Versions 6.0, 6.0 SP1, 6.0 SP1 P1, 6.0 SP1 P2, 6.0 SP2, 6.0 SP2 P1, 6.0 SP3, and 6.0 SP3 P1 - Upgrade to 6.0.3.1 HF1 RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Versions 5.3 SP4, 5.3 SP3, 5.3 SP2, and earlier - Upgrade to version 5.3 SP4 P1 or a 6.x version, and then apply the necessary remediation "Dell recommends that RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines be deployed within a trusted, access-controlled internal network protected by appropriate firewalls and network segmentation," it noted. "RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is not intended for use on untrusted or public networks." "We are aware of less than a dozen impacted organizations, but because the full scale of this campaign is unknown, we recommend that organizations previously targeted by BRICKSTORM look out for GRIMBOLT in their environments," Rich Reece, Manager, Mandiant Consulting at Google Cloud, told The Hacker News via email. Mandiant said it discovered CVE-2026-22769 earlier this year while investigating multiple Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines within an unspecified victim's environment. "The actor is likely still active in unpatched and remediated environments, and because exploitation has been occurring since mid-2024, they have had significant time to establish persistence and carry out long-term espionage," Reece said. "We anticipate additional companies will find active or historic compromises as they begin hunting using the new IOCs/YARA rules we published." Per Google, the hard-coded credential relates to an "admin" user for the Apache Tomcat Manager instance that could be used authenticate to the Dell RecoverPoint Tomcat Manager, upload a web shell named SLAYSTYLE via the "/manager/text/deploy" endpoint, and execute commands as root on the appliance to drop the BRICKSTORM backdoor and its newer version dubbed GRIMBOLT. "This is a C# backdoor compiled using native ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation, making it harder to reverse engineer," Mandiant's Charles Carmakal added. Google told The Hacker News that the activity has targeted organizations across North America, with GRIMBOLT incorporating features to better evade detection and minimize forensic traces on infected hosts. "GRIMBOLT is even better at blending in with the system's own native files," it added. UNC6201 is also assessed to share overlaps with UNC5221, another China-nexus espionage cluster known for its exploitation of virtualization technologies and Ivanti zero-day vulnerabilities to distribute web shells and malware families like BEEFLUSH, BRICKSTORM, and ZIPLINE. Despite the tactical similarities, the two clusters are assessed to be distinct at this stage. It's worth noting that the use of BRICKSTORM has also been linked by CrowdStrike to a third China-aligned adversary tracked as Warp Panda (aka Clay Typhoon and Storm-2416) in attacks aimed at U.S. entities. A noteworthy aspect of the latest set of attacks revolves around UNC6201's reliance on temporary virtual network interfaces – referred to as "Ghost NICs" – to pivot from compromised virtual machines into internal or SaaS environments, and then delete those NICs to cover up the tracks in an effort to impede investigation efforts. "Consistent with the earlier BRICKSTORM campaign, UNC6201 continues to target appliances that typically lack traditional endpoint detection and response (EDR) agents to remain undetected for long periods," Google said. Exactly how initial access is obtained remains unclear, but like UNC5221, it's also known to target edge appliances to break into target networks. An analysis of the compromised VMware vCenter appliances has also uncovered iptable commands executed by means of the web shell to perform the following set of actions - Monitor incoming traffic on port 443 for a specific HEX string Add the source IP address of that traffic to a list and if the IP address is on the list and connects to port 10443, the connection is ACCEPTED Silently redirect subsequent traffic to port 443 to port 10443 for the next 300 seconds (five minutes) if the IP is on the approved list Furthermore, the threat actor has been found replacing old BRICKSTORM binaries with GRIMBOLT in September 2025. While GRIMBOLT also provides a remote shell capability and uses the same command-and-control (C2) as BRICKSTORM, it's not known what prompted the shift to the harder-to-detect malware, and whether it was a planned transition or a response to public disclosures about BRICKSTORM. "Nation-state threat actors continue targeting systems that don't commonly support EDR solutions, which makes it very hard for victim organizations to know they are compromised and significantly prolongs intrusion dwell times," Carmakal said. The disclosure comes as Dragos warned of attacks mounted by Chinese groups like Volt Typhoon (aka Voltzite) to compromise Sierra Wireless Airlink gateways located in electric and oil and gas sectors, followed by pivoting to engineering workstations to dump config and alarm data. The activity, according to the cybersecurity company, took place in July 2025. The hacking crew is said to acquire initial access from Sylvanite, which rapidly weaponizes edge device vulnerabilities before patches are applied and hands off access for deeper operational technology (OT) intrusions. "Voltzite moved beyond data exfiltration to direct manipulation of engineering workstations investigating what would trigger processes to stop," Dragos said. " This represents the removal of the last practical barrier between having access and causing physical consequences. Cellular gateways create unauthorized pathways into OT networks bypassing traditional security controls." Update The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), on February 18, 2026, added CVE-2026-22769 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, requiring Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to apply the patch by February 21, 2026. Update In a follow-up analysis published on March 5, 2026, Team Cymru shed more light on the C2 infrastructure associated with GRIMBOLT, using an X.509 certificate's subject field value for the IP address 149.248.11[.]71 – CN=WIN-DO6FVJH67FN – to uncover additional IP addresses using the same certificate: 140.82.18[.]134 and 66.42.111[.]219. "Analysis of these IP addresses revealed that they are also located on the same VPS provider (Vultr) due to their autonomous system number (ASN) being the same in their WHOIS records," security researcher Will Thomas said. "Furthermore, these two additional IP addresses both had the same 3389 (RDP) port open as well." "The overlap of a cryptographically identical X509 certificate, matching autonomous system (ASN) routing, and correlated open port profiles strongly indicates the use of cloned virtual machine images or an automated provisioning script by the threat actor on a single VPS provider, Vultr." (The story was updated after publication on March 6, 2026, with new insights from Team Cymru.)
thehackernews.comFeb 18, 2026extracted
OT teams are losing the time advantage against industrial threat actors
OT teams are losing the time advantage against industrial threat actors In many industrial environments, internet-facing gateways, remote access appliances, and boundary systems sit close enough to production networks that attackers can move from IT intrusion to operational disruption with limited resistance. Dragos’ 2026 OT/ICS Year in Review describes a threat landscape where adversaries are spending more time learning how physical processes work and less time treating OT access as a passive foothold. A shift in 2025 involved multiple state-aligned groups moving into control-loop mapping. That includes identifying engineering workstations, pulling configuration and alarm files, and collecting enough operational context to interfere with physical outcomes. Control-loop mapping removes a key barrier between unauthorized access and physical impact, since attackers no longer need to guess how a process behaves. “Adversaries are mapping how control systems work, understanding where commands originate, how they propagate, and where physical effects can be induced,” said Robert M. Lee, CEO of Dragos. “We’re seeing the ecosystem evolve with specialized threat groups systematically building access pathways for more capable adversaries to reach OT environments. Meanwhile, ransomware groups are causing more operational disruption and multi-day outages that require OT-specific recovery. Yet industrial organizations significantly underestimate the reach of ransomware into OT environments because they think it’s ‘just IT.’” Dragos tracked 26 threat groups targeting OT environments, including three new groups identified in 2025: AZURITE, PYROXENE, and SYLVANITE. The activity across these groups shows more specialization and a growing division of labor, where one team focuses on gaining access and another focuses on OT operations. Initial access groups are feeding OT-capable operators SYLVANITE was tracked as a large-scale initial access group targeting industrial organizations through internet-facing systems. Its operations relied heavily on rapid exploitation of vulnerabilities in products from Ivanti, F5, SAP, and ConnectWise. The group also used tooling such as Cobalt Strike, Sliver, and multiple web shells, then handed access to other actors, including VOLTZITE. A May 2025 incident involved exploitation of Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile (EPMM) at a U.S. utility through CVE-2025-4427 and CVE-2025-4428. Attackers extracted data from the backend MySQL database, including LDAP user details and Office 365 tokens, then replayed those credentials internally for lateral movement. The incident response effort was limited by lack of telemetry in adjacent networks, leaving responders unable to confirm whether attackers moved toward OT systems. This type of access brokering compresses the time between vulnerability disclosure and operational risk. It also increases the number of industrial organizations exposed to follow-on OT attacks, even when the initial compromise appears limited to a DMZ or enterprise-adjacent system. Control-loop reconnaissance is becoming routine KAMACITE and ELECTRUM remained central examples of how access-building translates into disruptive operations. KAMACITE has historically operated as an access development group supporting ELECTRUM, the actor tied to Ukraine’s 2015 and 2016 power outages. In late 2024 through early 2025, KAMACITE expanded beyond Ukraine and targeted the European OT supply chain. Activity included spear phishing aimed at engineering and vendor personnel and long-running conversations using industry-specific terms. After that campaign, KAMACITE shifted into sustained reconnaissance against internet-exposed industrial devices in the United States between March and July 2025. The scanning focused on specific components including Schneider Electric Altivar variable frequency drives, Smart HMIs, Accuenergy AXM modules, and Sierra Wireless Airlink gateways. The sequencing suggested deliberate mapping of entire control loops, moving from operator interfaces to actuators, metering points, and remote gateways. Dragos found no evidence of successful exploitation during the scanning activity. The reconnaissance still indicates that exposed edge devices are being treated as operational intelligence sources, with collected data that could support future disruption planning. Destructive malware development continues to mature ELECTRUM activity in 2025 included destructive operations targeting Ukrainian infrastructure. In late May 2025, the group targeted eight Ukrainian ISPs, with responsibility claimed through the pro-Russian hacktivist persona Solntsepek. Dragos verified outages, including a four-hour disruption affecting Corbina’s autonomous system. In parallel, researchers identified a destructive malware family called PathWiper, linked by Dragos to ELECTRUM with moderate confidence. PathWiper was identified in June 2025, with samples appearing in the wild beginning in March 2025. The malware overwrote filesystem structures, enumerated mounted volumes, and targeted all accessible storage media to cause irreversible data loss. Dragos also identified another destructive wiper variant in December 2025, reinforcing ongoing iteration in ELECTRUM’s malware pipeline. Ransomware remains an OT outage driver Ransomware groups continued to target industrial organizations at scale. Dragos tracked 119 ransomware groups impacting more than 3,300 industrial organizations in 2025, up from 80 groups in 2024. Manufacturing accounted for more than two-thirds of observed victims. A recurring issue involved misclassification of ransomware events as IT-only incidents. In multiple cases, engineering workstations and HMI systems were treated as standard Windows endpoints, even when they supported SCADA or other operational workloads. The operational disruption often came through boundary systems such as VMware ESXi hosts and OT-support servers that ran historian and engineering functions. Visibility gaps are leaving defenders blind Dragos found that 30 percent of its incident response cases in 2025 began with operational staff reporting abnormal behavior, not with alerts or confirmed detection. In many cases, the telemetry required to determine whether cyber activity was involved had never been collected. Dragos estimated fewer than 10 percent of OT networks worldwide have visibility and monitoring in place. The overall pattern across 2025 showed attackers moving faster, operating deeper, and relying on weak segmentation and exposed access paths. The most urgent challenge remains basic: collect OT network data before an incident, monitor remote access pathways, and treat engineering workstations and OT boundary systems as high-value operational assets.
helpnetsecurity.comFeb 17, 2026extracted
CISA Adds Actively Exploited Sierra Wireless Router Flaw Enabling RCE Attacks
The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on Friday added a high-severity flaw impacting Sierra Wireless AirLink ALEOS routers to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, following reports of active exploitation in the wild. CVE-2018-4063 (CVSS score: 8.8/9.9) refers to an unrestricted file upload vulnerability that could be exploited to achieve remote code execution by means of a malicious HTTP request. "A specially crafted HTTP request can upload a file, resulting in executable code being uploaded, and routable, to the webserver," the agency said. "An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability." Details of the six-year-old flaw were publicly shared by Cisco Talos in April 2019, describing it as an exploitable remote code execution vulnerability in the ACEManager "upload.cgi" function of Sierra Wireless AirLink ES450 firmware version 4.9.3. Talos reported the flaw to the Canadian company in December 2018. "This vulnerability exists in the file upload capability of templates within the AirLink 450," the company said. "When uploading template files, you can specify the name of the file that you are uploading." "There are no restrictions in place that protect the files that are currently on the device, used for normal operation. If a file is uploaded with the same name of the file that already exists in the directory, then we inherit the permissions of that file." Talos noted that some of the files that exist in the directory (e.g., "fw_upload_init.cgi" or "fw_status.cgi") have executable permissions on the device, meaning an attacker can send HTTP requests to the "/cgi-bin/upload.cgi" endpoint to upload a file with the same name to achieve code execution. This is compounded by the fact that ACEManager runs as root, thereby causing any shell script or executable uploaded to the device to also run with elevated privileges. The addition of CVE-2018-4063 to the KEV catalog comes a day after a honeypot analysis conducted by Forescout over a 90-day period revealed that industrial routers are the most attacked devices in operational technology (OT) environments, with threat actors attempting to deliver botnet and cryptocurrency miner malware families like RondoDox, Redtail, and ShadowV2 by exploiting the following flaws - CVE-2024-12856 (Four-Faith routers) CVE-2024-0012, CVE-2024-9474, and CVE-2025-0108 (Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS) Attacks have also been recorded from a previously undocumented threat cluster named Chaya_005 that weaponized CVE-2018-4063 in early January 2024 to upload an unspecified malicious payload with the name "fw_upload_init.cgi." No further successful exploitation efforts have been detected since then. "Chaya_005 appears to be a broader reconnaissance campaign testing multiple vendor vulnerabilities rather than focusing on a single one," Forescout Research – Vedere Labs said, adding it's likely the cluster is no longer a "significant threat." In light of active exploitation of CVE-2018-4063, Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies are advised to update their devices to a supported version or discontinue the use of the product by January 2, 2026, since it has reached end-of-support status.
thehackernews.comDec 13, 2025extracted
Salt Typhoon Exploits Cisco, Ivanti, Palo Alto Flaws to Breach 600 Organizations Worldwide
The China-linked advanced persistent threat (APT) actor known as Salt Typhoon has continued its attacks targeting networks across the world, including organizations in the telecommunications, government, transportation, lodging, and military infrastructure sectors. "While these actors focus on large backbone routers of major telecommunications providers, as well as provider edge (PE) and customer edge (CE) routers, they also leverage compromised devices and trusted connections to pivot into other networks," according to a joint cybersecurity advisory published Wednesday. "These actors often modify routers to maintain persistent, long-term access to networks." The bulletin, courtesy of authorities from 13 countries, said the malicious activity has been linked to three Chinese entities, Sichuan Juxinhe Network Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing Huanyu Tianqiong Information Technology Co., Ltd., and Sichuan Zhixin Ruijie Network Technology Co., Ltd. These companies, the agencies said, provide cyber-related products and services to China's intelligence services, with the data stolen from the intrusions, specifically those against telecoms and Internet service providers (ISPs), providing Beijing with the ability to identify and track their targets' communications and movements globally. The countries that have co-sealed the security advisory include Australia, Canada, the Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Spain, the U.K., and the U.S. Brett Leatherman, head of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation's Cyber Division, said the Salt Typhoon group has been active since at least 2019, engaging in a persistent espionage campaign aimed at "breaching global telecommunications privacy and security norms." In a standalone alert issued today, Dutch intelligence and security services MIVD and AIVD said while organizations in the country "did not receive the same degree of attention from the Salt Typhoon hackers as those in the U.S.," the threat actors gained access to routers of smaller ISPs and hosting providers. However, there is no evidence the hackers penetrated these networks further. "Since at least 2021, this activity has targeted organisations in critical sectors including government, telecommunications, transportation, lodging, and military infrastructure globally, with a cluster of activity observed in the U.K.," the National Cyber Security Centre said. According to The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post, the hacking crew has expanded its targeting focus to other sectors and regions, attacking no less than 600 organizations, including 200 in the U.S., and 80 countries. Salt Typhoon, which overlaps with activity tracked as GhostEmperor, Operator Panda, RedMike, and UNC5807, has been observed obtaining initial access through the exploitation of exposed network edge devices from Cisco (CVE-2018-0171, CVE-2023-20198, and CVE-2023-20273), Ivanti (CVE-2023-46805 and CVE-2024-21887), and Palo Alto Networks (CVE-2024-3400). However, the agencies pointed out these vulnerabilities are not "exhaustive" and that the threat actors may also go after other devices such as Fortinet firewalls, Juniper firewalls, Microsoft Exchange, Nokia routers and switches, Sierra Wireless devices, and Sonicwall firewalls, among others for initial access. "The APT actors may target edge devices regardless of who owns a particular device," the agencies noted. "Devices owned by entities that do not align with the actors’ core targets of interest still present opportunities for use in attack pathways into targets of interest." The compromised devices are then leveraged to pivot into other networks, in some cases even modifying the device's configuration and adding a generic routing encapsulation (GRE) tunnel for persistent access and data exfiltration. Persistent access to target networks is accomplished by altering Access Control Lists (ACLs) to add IP addresses under their control, opening standard and non-standard ports, and running commands in an on-box Linux container on supported Cisco networking devices to stage tools, process data locally, and move laterally within the environment. Also put to use by the attackers are authentication protocols like Terminal Access Controller Access Control System Plus (TACACS+) to enable lateral movement across network devices, while simultaneously conducting extensive discovery actions and capturing network traffic containing credentials via compromised routers to burrow deeper into the networks. "The APT actors collected PCAPs using native tooling on the compromised system, with the primary objective likely being to capture TACACS+ traffic over TCP port 49," the agencies said. "TACACS+ traffic is used for authentication, often for administration of network equipment and including highly privileged network administrators' accounts and credentials, likely enabling the actors to compromise additional accounts and perform lateral movement." On top of that, Salt Typhoon has been observed enabling the sshd_operns service on Cisco IOS XR devices to create a local user and grant it sudo privileges to obtain root on the host OS after logging in via TCP/57722. Google-owned Mandiant, which was one of the many industry partners that contributed to the advisory, stated the threat actor's familiarity with telecommunications systems offers them a unique advantage, giving them an upper hand when it comes to defense evasion. It's worth pointing out that UNC5807 is a threat cluster that's distinct from UNC2286, which, in the past, has been identified as overlapping with FamousSparrow and GhostEmperor, according to Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) and Mandiant. "While some public reporting has associated both UNC5807 and UNC2286 with the 'GhostEmperor' alias, Google assesses these to be distinct threat clusters," Dan Perez, China Mission Lead at GTIG, told The Hacker News. "Our analysis is based on distinctions in their operational tradecraft and motivations." "The toolsets used by each group are different. UNC5807 has been observed using a specific and limited set of malware families. In contrast, UNC2286 employs a much broader and more varied arsenal of malicious tools. Additionally their objectives are different. We have observed UNC2286 conducting financially motivated attacks, including ransomware deployment and extortion. The activities attributed to UNC5807, however, are consistent with espionage operations." "An ecosystem of contractors, academics, and other facilitators is at the heart of Chinese cyber espionage," John Hultquist, Chief Analyst at GTIG, told the publication. Contractors are used to build tools and valuable exploits as well as carry out the dirty work of intrusion operations. They have been instrumental in the rapid evolution of these operations and growing them to an unprecedented scale." "In addition to targeting telecommunications, reported targeting of hospitality and transportation by this actor could be used to closely surveil individuals. Information from these sectors can be used to develop a full picture of who someone is talking to, where they are, and where they are going." (The story was updated after publication to make it clear that the threat actors are targeting and may target a broad range of edge network appliances.)
thehackernews.comAug 28, 2025extracted