Search/pagerduty
● Vendor

pagerduty

Known CVEs
0
Highest CVSS
—
In KEV
0
Vendor
rundeck
Connections
9 relationships
GitHub Copilot app launches as desktop home for AI coding agents
GitHub Copilot app launches as desktop home for AI coding agents GitHub introduced the Copilot app, a desktop application built for working with AI coding agents, at Microsoft Build 2026. The release expands GitHub’s Copilot product line beyond editor integrations and command-line tools into a dedicated workspace for directing several agents at once. The Copilot app is available in technical preview to existing Copilot Pro, Pro+, Business, and Enterprise subscribers. A control center for parallel agent sessions The Copilot app provides a single “My Work” view showing active sessions, open issues, pull requests, and background automations across connected repositories. “Every session runs in its own git worktree, a real, isolated copy of your branch. This helps parallel agent sessions work without stepping on each other. The app handles every worktree for you: no manual setup, no cleanup, no branch juggling. Whether you start from a prompt or an issue from your inbox, Copilot gets the context it needs from existing issues, pull requests, and the repos you’ve connected,” Mario Rodriguez, Chief Product Officer at GitHub, explained. A feature called Agent Merge follows a pull request through review and integration. It monitors continuous integration checks, tracks required reviewers, addresses failing checks, and waits for merge conditions to be met. Developers decide which steps Copilot is allowed to perform, including driving CI back to green, addressing reviewer feedback, and completing the merge. Copilot Max, a higher-tier subscription aimed at heavy agent users, is available as an upgrade from Copilot Pro, Pro+, and EDU plans. Canvases for inspectable work The Copilot app also introduces canvases, work surfaces shared between humans and agents. A canvas can display a plan, pull request, browser session, terminal, deployment, dashboard, or workflow state. Agents update the canvas as work progresses, and developers can edit, reorder, approve, or redirect that work on the same surface. The chat interface handles instruction and discussion, and canvases hold the work itself for inspection and verification. Code review updates Copilot code review gained a medium tier that routes pull requests to a higher-reasoning model for better precision and recall. Administrators can set the review effort level for individual repositories to “low” or “medium,” matching model strength to repository risk and impact. Two skills accompany the update. The /security-review skill provides a dedicated path for security-focused evaluation. The /rubberduck skill, now generally available, uses multiple model families to critique implementations and surface novel issues. Copilot code review is also available natively on Azure DevOps, with the same one-click review, inline comments, and committable fix suggestions provided on GitHub. Administrators can enable it on selected repositories. SDK, CLI, and partner integrations The GitHub Copilot SDK reached general availability in Node.js/TypeScript, Python, Go, .NET, Rust, and Java. The SDK exposes the same agentic runtime that powers the Copilot app, giving teams a foundation for building internal tooling such as code analysis utilities, release-notes generators, and agents embedded in support workflows. The Copilot CLI received a redesigned terminal user interface in /experimental mode, with tabbed access to pull requests, issues, and gists. A voice mode uses on-device speech-to-text, keeping audio on the local machine. An /every command schedules recurring prompts and background tasks. Cloud automations let agents run on a schedule, respond to GitHub events, open issues, and post comments. The cloud agent asks permission before each write action by default, with an autopilot mode available once teams establish trust. The Copilot cloud agent can file issues, start discussions, and reply to reviewers. Memory++ and the /chronicle command provide continuity across devices and over time, letting context from sessions started in the Copilot app, CLI, VS Code, or on GitHub be queried later. “Partner-built agent apps integrate with GitHub Copilot to help automate tasks, generate code, analyze context, and execute actions. Use your favorite tools without leaving GitHub. Assign issues to new agents that fit your workflow. Partners include LaunchDarkly, Bright, Amplitude, Sonar, Endor Labs, Octopus Deploy, Packfiles, PagerDuty, and Miro. Start using these agent apps today,” Rodriguez concluded.
helpnetsecurity.comJun 8, 2026extracted
「AIには期待、でも導入は渋りがち」な日本企業 4割がインシデントで“1時間に8000万円超の損失”を経験
PagerDuty����Ƃ�IT�^�p�������Ƃ���A������Ƃق�IT�^�p�̃��W���G���X���P���i�ތX��������ꂽ�BAI���p�ɖڂ�������ƁA���ɓ��{��Ƃł͊��҂Ɠ����ɃM���b�v���������Ƃ����B �@�T�C�o�[�U����V�X�e����Q�Ƃ������C���V�f���g�̊Ǘ����x������PagerDuty��2026�N4��16���A�u2026�N�� AI-First Operations���Ԓ������|�[�g�v�\�����B����́A��Ƃ�IT�^�p�ɂ����郌�W���G���X�i�́j��AI���p�̎��Ԃ��܂Ƃ߂����|�[�g���B �@�����|�[�g�́A���{��č����܂ސ��E�̃r�W�l�X���[�_�[�AIT����̈ӎv����ҁA�J������̐ӔC�҂Ȃ�1000�l�i�lj��C���^�r���[���܂߂��1100�l�ȏ�j�ւ̒������ʂɊ�Â��BPagerDuty�̈ϑ�������O�ҋ@��Wakefield Research���A2025�N12���ɃI�����C������Œ��������{�����B �@�ߋ�1�N�ԂŃ��W���G���X�����P�����Ɖ�����Ƃ́A�S�̂�71���������B���㍂���������Ă����ƂɌ���ƁA���̊�����74���ɏ��B���㍂��������Ă����Ƃł�64���ɂƂǂ܂�A10�|�C���g�̍�������ꂽ�B���W���G���X���オ�A���Ɛ��ʂɈ��̉e��������\��������B �@�C���V�f���g�ɂ�鑹���̑傫������������ɂȂ����B�����Ώۊ�Ƃ�68�����A�C���V�f���g��������1���ԓ�����30���i��4800���~�s1�h������160�~���Z�A�ȉ������t�j�h���ȏ�̑������o�������i�}1�j�B���̂���34�|�C���g��50���h���i��8000���~�j�ȏ�A8�|�C���g��100���h���i��1��6000���~�j�ȏ�̑������o�������Ƃ����B �@�d��ȃC���V�f���g����Ƃɗ^����e���Ƃ��Ắu�u�����h��]���̚ʑ��i������j�v�i52���j���g�b�v�ƂȂ����B�����Łu������C���ɂ�����R�X�g�v�i50���j��u���Y���̒ቺ�v�i48���j�����������B �@�C���V�f���g�ɂ���āA1���ԓ�����50���h���ȏ�̑������o���������{��Ƃ�43���ɏ�����B����͕č���Ɓi31���j����12�|�C���g�����B�C���V�f���g������̕��͂���P�����ɂ��āu���ɑ傫�ȕK�v��������v�Ɖ������{��Ƃ�33������������A�O���[�o�����ς�23���ɂƂǂ܂����B �@AI������������ƁA���{��Ƃ�55���ŁA�č���Ƃ�68����13�|�C���g��������B�����AI���p�ւ̊��҂͍����B�u�l�ފl���E�蒅�v�����҂�����{��Ƃ�55���A�u�����͂̋����v�u���Y���̉��P�v�͂������46���������i�}2�j�B�����́A��������O���[�o�����ρi���ꂼ��45���A40���A42���j������B �@PagerDuty�Ń�[�t�}�[�P�e�B���O�I�t�B�T�[�iCMO�j�߂�L���T�����E�J���o�[�g���́A�d��C���V�f���g����ƌo�c�ɗ^����e�����傫���Ȃ钆�A���W���G���X�������d�v�Ȍo�c�ۑ�ɂȂ��Ă���Ǝw�E����B���̏�ŁAAI�����p���ăC���V�f���g�Ǘ���v�������邱�ƂŁA��Q�������̃T�[�r�X�����𑁂߂���Ƃ̌����������B Copyright © ITmedia, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
atmarkit.itmedia.co.jpJun 3, 2026extracted
Cursor Automations turns code review and ops into background tasks
Cursor Automations turns code review and ops into background tasks Cursor Automations, the always-on agent platform from Cursor, is expanding with a new generation of autonomous systems that streamline code review, incident response, and other engineering workflows. The platform runs AI agents on schedules or in response to development events. These triggers include merged pull requests on GitHub, newly created issues in Linear, messages sent in Slack, incidents reported through PagerDuty, and custom webhook events. Cursor aims to help engineering teams keep up with the speed of software delivery by scaling code review, monitoring, and maintenance with autonomous agents. “Automations are great for reviewing changes. They can catch and fix everything from style nits and inconsistencies to security vulnerabilities and performance regressions,” the company said in its announcement. Three core automation systems Cursor identified three high-impact automation categories integrated in its engineering pipeline: Security review Triggered on every push to the main branch, this agent audits code changes for security issues, skips items already discussed in pull requests, and posts high-risk findings to Slack. Because the agent operates asynchronously, it does not delay developer workflows. Agentic codeowners This system assesses pull request risk based on blast radius, technical complexity, and infrastructure impact. Low-risk changes are approved automatically, while higher-risk updates prompt reviewer assignments based on contribution history. Decisions are summarized in Slack and logged to Notion via MCP integrations so teams can review and refine agent behavior over time. Incident response When PagerDuty detects an incident, an automation launches an agent that uses Datadog integrations to investigate logs and examine recent code changes. The agent notifies on-call engineers in Slack with monitoring details and proposes a fix through an automated pull request. Routine workflow automations Cursor has also deployed agents for routine tasks and cross-tool coordination. Each morning, agents review recently merged code to identify areas lacking test coverage. Others triage bug reports by identifying duplicates, creating issues in Linear, investigating root causes, and posting summaries. Another automation publishes a weekly Slack digest of repository activity from the prior seven days.
helpnetsecurity.comMar 6, 2026extracted
Cisco Meraki + PagerDuty Integration for Faster Incident Response
We’re excited to share a major update for IT and developer teams: the new Cisco Meraki → PagerDuty integration is now live! For developers and network engineers, managing critical alerts and reducing response times are top priorities. With this new no-code integration, you can now connect Cisco Meraki directly to PagerDuty—right from the Meraki dashboard, with zero custom scripting required. What’s New for Developers? Effortless Setup: Configure PagerDuty integration directly within the Meraki dashboard. No coding, APIs, or complex workflows needed. Pre-Mapped Alerts: High-value Meraki alerts are already mapped for you—making it easy to route the most critical events to your response teams. Automatic Incident Routing: Incidents are instantly sent to your existing PagerDuty on-call schedules, ensuring rapid response by the right people, every time. Why It Matters: Historically, integrating network alerts with incident management often required custom code, manual mapping, and tedious configuration. This new integration eliminates those steps, streamlining operations, reducing alert fatigue, and helping teams improve mean time to resolution (MTTR). See It in Action Want a closer look? Check out our demo video to see just how quickly you can enable and benefit from this integration. Get Started Today Ready to empower your network operations and developer workflows? Visit your Cisco Meraki Dashboard and navigate to Organization > Integrations to enable PagerDuty integration in just a few clicks. Stay tuned for more developer-centric updates and integrations from Cisco! Example Developer Use Cases: Immediate Incident Notification: When a Meraki device experiences an outage, developers are instantly notified via PagerDuty, allowing them to triage and resolve issues before end users are impacted. Automated On-Call Escalations: Critical network alerts auto-route to the correct on-call engineer, without custom webhook scripts or manual intervention. Note: The integration is designed for all skill levels—no coding required. Customization options are available for advanced alert routing in PagerDuty. For questions or feedback, let us know in the comments!
blogs.cisco.comDec 19, 2025extracted
Optimize security operations with AWS Security Incident Response
Optimize security operations with AWS Security Incident Response July 6, 2026: We updated this post to reflect current feature capabilities. Security threats demand swift action, which is why AWS Security Incident Response delivers protection that can immediately strengthen your security posture. This comprehensive solution combines automated triage and evaluation logic with your security perimeter metadata to identify critical issues, seamlessly bringing in human expertise when needed. When Security Incident Response is integrated with Amazon GuardDuty and AWS Security Hub within a unified security environment, organizations gain 24/7 access to AWS security incident response professionals for rapid detection, expert analysis, and efficient threat containment—managed through one intuitive console. AWS Security Incident Response is included with AWS Enterprise Support and AWS Unified Operations, which helps organizations adopt and operate AWS at scale efficiently and securely. In this post, we guide you through enabling Security Incident Response and executing a proof of concept (POC) to quickly enhance your security capabilities while realizing immediate benefits. We explore the service’s functionality, establish POC success criteria, define your configuration, prepare for deployment, enable the service, and optimize effectiveness from day one, helping your organization build confidence throughout the incident response lifecycle while improving recovery time. Understanding the functionality of Security Incident Response AWS Security Incident Response service provides comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities through a streamlined four-step process. It begins by ingesting security findings from GuardDuty and select Security Hub Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) integrations with third-party tools. The service then automatically triages these findings using customer metadata and threat intelligence to identify anomalous behavior and suspicious activities. When potential threats are detected, Security Incident Response team responders proactively investigate cases through the customer portal to determine whether they are true or false positives. For confirmed threats, the service escalates findings for immediate action, while false positives trigger updates to the auto-triage system and suppression rules for GuardDuty and Security Hub, continuously improving detection accuracy. Comprehensive protection with minimal prerequisites Security Incident Response delivers powerful security capabilities through seamless integration with both the threat detection and incident response (TDIR) system and third-party security services such as CrowdStrike, Lacework, TrendMicro, SentinelOne, Palo Alto Networks – Prisma Cloud Compute, and Wiz (Toxic Combinations). This solution provides a unified command center for end-to-end incident management—from planning and communication to resolution—while ingesting GuardDuty findings and integrating with external providers through Security Hub CSPM. For third-party integrations, only finding ingestion is required—not the full Security Hub CSPM feature set (no security standards, controls, or compliance checks needed). The first 10,000 findings per month do not incur any costs, then cost $0.00003 per finding thereafter (for example, 610,000 findings cost about $18 per month). For more information, see Security Hub CSPM pricing. With secure case management and an immutable activity timeline, it significantly enhances your security operations by augmenting your security operations center (SOC) and incident response (IR) teams with improved visibility and access to AWS-proven tools and personnel. AWS security incident response personnel work collaboratively with your responders during investigations and recovery, freeing your valuable resources for other priorities. The service delivers continuous value through proactive monitoring and response capabilities. It constantly monitors your environment using GuardDuty and Security Hub findings, with service automation, triage, and analysis working diligently in the background to alert you only for genuine security concerns. This protection provides immediate value during potential incidents without demanding your constant attention. Getting started is straightforward—the only prerequisite is having AWS Organizations enabled and making sure that you have established Organizations with a fundamental organizational unit (OU) structure encompassing member accounts. This foundation not only enables Security Incident Response deployment but also serves as the cornerstone for implementing a robust TDIR strategy across your organization. Determine success criteria Establishing success criteria helps benchmark the outcomes of the POC with the goals of the business. Some example criteria include: Designate an incident response team: Identity and document internal team members and external resources responsible for incident response. As highlighted in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar, having designated personnel reduces triage and response times during security incidents. Develop a formal incident response framework: Develop a comprehensive incident response plan with detailed playbooks and regular table-top exercise protocols. AWS provides a reference library of playbooks on GitHub. Run tabletop exercises: Consider implementing regular simulations that test incident response plans, identify gaps, and build muscle memory across security teams before a real crisis occurs. AWS provides context on various types of tabletop exercises. Identify existing third-party security providers: Identify third-party security providers with Security Hub integrations that feed into Security Incident Response. AWS partners provide findings as documented at Detect and Analyze. Implement GuardDuty: Configure GuardDuty according to best practices to monitor and detect threats across critical services. AWS maintains GuardDuty best practices in AWS Security Services Best Practices for GuardDuty. Review your success criteria to make sure that your goals are realistic given your timeframe and potential constraints that are specific to your organization. For example, do you have full control over the configuration of AWS services that are deployed in an organization? Do you have resources that can dedicate time to implement and test? Is this time convenient for relevant stakeholders to evaluate the service? Define your Security Incident Response configuration After establishing your success criteria and timeline, it’s best practice to define your Security Incident Response configuration. Some important decisions include the following: Select a delegated administrator account: Identify which account will serve as delegated administrator (DA) for Security Incident Response. This account and the AWS Region you select will host the Security Incident Response service and portal. AWS Security Reference Architecture (AWS SRA) recommends using dedicated security tooling account. Review the considerations and recommendations documentation before finalizing the DA. Define the account scope: Security Incident Response is considered an organization-level service. Every account in every Region within your organization is entitled to coverage under a single subscription. Service coverage automatically adjusts as accounts are added or removed, providing complete protection across your entire AWS footprint. Configure findings sources: Determine which security findings meet your organization’s needs. The service automatically ingests GuardDuty findings organization-wide and select Security Hub finding types from third-party partners. Evaluate which GuardDuty protection plans and Security Hub findings provide the most value for your security posture and incident response capabilities. Develop an escalation framework: Establish clear escalation thresholds for different case types: self-managed, AWS-supported, and proactive cases. Define who has authority to determine case submission and type based on severity, impact, and resource requirements. Implement analytics strategy: Determine whether to use native AWS analytics tools (such as Amazon Athena, Amazon OpenSearch, and Amazon Detective) or integrate with existing security information and event management (SIEM) solutions. These capabilities can enrich incident response with contextual data and deeper insights. Prepare for deployment After determining success criteria and Security Incident Response configuration, identify stakeholders, desired state, and timeframe. Prepare for deployment by completing: Project plan and timeline: Develop a project plan with defined success criteria, scope boundaries, key milestones, and realistic implementation timelines. Suggested timeline of events: - Before enablement: Configure GuardDuty, and optionally Security Hub third parties, perform resource planning - Day 0 – Enable the service - Week 1 – Open reactive security incident response cases - Week 2 – Connect to IT service management (ITSM) tools - Week 3 – Execute a tabletop exercise - Week 4 – Review the reporting provided from the service Identify stakeholders: Identify CISO, information security teams, SOC personnel, incident response teams, security engineers, finance, legal, compliance, external MSSPs, and business unit representatives. Develop a RACI matrix: Create detailed RACI chart defining roles and responsibilities across incident response lifecycle, facilitating accountability and proper communication channels. Configure management account access: Secure authorization to delegate administrative access. For more information, see Permissions required to designate a delegated Security Incident Response administrator account. Set up IAM roles and permissions: Use AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles to implement role-based access controls aligned with the RACI chart, including case management, escalation, and read-only roles using AWS managed policies. For more information, see AWS Managed Policies. Enable Security Incident Response With preparations in place, you are ready to enable the service. Access Security Incident Response in the management account: Within the organization’s management account, go to the AWS Management Console and search for Security Incident Response in the console search bar. Choose Sign Up. Verify that Use delegated administrator account – Recommended is selected, enter the delegated administrator account number in the Account ID field and choose Next. Sign in to the delegated administrator account configured in step 3, search for Security Incident Response, and choose Sign up. Complete setup in the delegated administrator account: Define membership details: - Select your home region under Region selection. - For Membership name, enter a suitable name that follows your organization’s naming standards. - Under Membership contacts, enter the Primary and Secondary contact information. Add Membership tags according to your organization’s tagging strategy. Choose Next. Configure permissions: - Select By choosing this option…, then choose Next. - Review service permissions and choose Next. Review the membership configuration and details, then choose Sign up. Note: Detailed instructions can be found in the YouTube setup video. Many organizations have well-established processes and application suites for IR and security threat management. To accommodate these pre-existing setups, AWS has developed integrations with popular ITSM and case management applications. AWS Security Incident Response enables bi-directional integration with Jira and ServiceNow (case updates are synced in both directions), and event-driven integrations with Slack and PagerDuty through Amazon EventBridge—with more on the way. We have provided comprehensive instructions to guide you through the setup process in GitHub. Optimize value on day one Immediately after enabling the service, Security Incident Response begins to ingest your GuardDuty findings—and Security Hub CSPM findings from security partners if you’ve configured them. Your findings are automatically triaged and monitored using deterministic evaluation logic; based on your organization’s unique metadata and security perimeter, high-priority threats are escalated to your Security Incident Response command center for immediate investigation. While your organization receives 24/7 coverage from the start, implementing these recommended optimizations will significantly enhance threat detection accuracy, reduce false positives, accelerate response times, and strengthen your overall security posture through customized protection aligned with your specific business risks and compliance requirements. To maximize immediate value from Security Incident Response, we suggest using its reactive capabilities beginning on day one. When your team encounters suspicious activities or requires expert investigation, you can create an AWS-supported case through the service portal to engage AWS security incident responders directly. These security experts effectively extend your team’s capabilities, providing specialized knowledge and guidance to help you quickly understand, contain, and remediate potential security concerns. This on-demand access to AWS security incident response can reduce your mean time to resolution, minimize potential impact, and make sure you have professional support even for complex security scenarios that might otherwise overwhelm internal resources. Examples of reactive support queries include: We noticed a suspicious IP address in our environment, performing various API calls. Can you help us investigate? A new account was created two days ago, we were notified through an Amazon EventBridge rule and our endpoint detection and response (EDR) integrations, can you help us scope it and find out who created it? How was it created? An AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) user is making cross-Region API calls and creating resources in an unused Region. Our EDR solution detected unusual behavior on our production website, indicating a potential breach. Our EDR detected a suspicious web-shell upload and activity. We need help investigating and isolating this. An unauthorized user generated API activity above their authorization level, help us find privilege escalations. We need help analyzing security logs from our AWS WAF and Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) instances. Are there any Indicators of compromise or suspicious patterns? Next steps If you decide to move forward with AWS Security Incident Response and deploy a POC, we recommend the following action items: Configure and deploy GuardDuty to help maintain comprehensive and relevant coverage across your management and member accounts, critical services, and workloads. Verify that third-party security tools (such as CrowdStrike, Lacework, or Trend Micro) are properly integrated with Security Hub. Communicate the security incident response tooling changes to the relevant organizational teams. Conclusion In this post, we showed you how to plan and implement an AWS Security Incident Response POC. You learned how to do so through phases, including defining success criteria, configuring Security Incident Response, and validating that Security Incident Response meets your business needs. As a customer, this guide will help you run a successful POC with Security Incident Response. It guides you in assessing the value and factors to consider when deciding to implement the current features. Additional resources AWS Security Incident Response – Getting started Configuring security tool integrations through Security Hub Managing Security Incident Response events with Amazon EventBridge Amazon GuardDuty best practices AWS Security Hub best practices AWS Security Incident Response Technical Guide (best practices) AWS Managed Services Offering AWS Security Incident Response Blog: The customer’s journey to accelerating the incident response lifecycle If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.
aws.amazon.comSep 23, 2025extracted
Week in review: Several companies affected by the Salesloft Drift breach, Sitecore 0-day vulnerability
Week in review: Several companies affected by the Salesloft Drift breach, Sitecore 0-day vulnerability Here’s an overview of some of last week’s most interesting news, articles, interviews and videos: Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, SpyCloud among the affected by Salesloft Drift breach In the wake of last week’s revelation of a breach at Salesloft by a group tracked by Google as UNC6395, several companies – including Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, PagerDuty, Tanium, and SpyCloud – have confirmed their Salesforce instances were accessed. Sitecore zero-day vulnerability exploited by attackers (CVE-2025-53690) A threat actor is leveraging a zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-53690) and an exposed sample ASP.NET machine key to breach internet-facing, on-premises deployments of several Sitecore solutions, Mandiant has revealed. macOS vulnerability allowed Keychain and iOS app decryption without a password At Nullcon Berlin, a researcher disclosed a macOS vulnerability (CVE-2025-24204) that allowed attackers to read the memory of any process, even with System Integrity Protection (SIP) enabled. Can AI agents catch what your SOC misses? A new research project called NetMoniAI shows how AI agents might reshape network monitoring and security. Developed by a team at Texas Tech University, the framework brings together two ideas: distributed monitoring at the edge and AI-driven analysis at the center. BruteForceAI: Free AI-powered login brute force tool BruteForceAI is a penetration testing tool that uses LLMs to improve the way brute-force attacks are carried out. Instead of relying on manual setup, the tool can analyze HTML content, detect login form selectors, and prepare the attack process automatically. LinkedIn expands company verification, mandates workplace checks for certain roles LinkedIn is rolling out new verification rules to make it easier to confirm that people and companies are who they claim to be. The company will now require workplace verification when someone adds or updates a leadership or recruiter role on their profile. The goal is to cut down on fake accounts and scams while helping businesses, recruiters, and professionals build credibility. Cloudflare confirms data breach linked to Salesloft Drift supply chain compromise Cloudflare has also been affected by the Salesloft Drift breach, the US web infrastructure and security company confirmed on Tuesday, and the attackers got their hands on 104 Cloudflare API tokens. Google fixes actively exploited Android vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-48543, CVE-2025-38352) Google has provided fixes for over 100 Android vulnerabilities, including CVE-2025-48543 and CVE-2025-38352, which “may be under limited, targeted exploitation.” Stealthy attack serves poisoned web pages only to AI agents AI agents can be tricked into covertly performing malicious actions by websites that are hidden from regular users’ view, JFrog AI architect Shaked Zychlinski has found. Attackers are exploiting critical SAP S/4HANA vulnerability (CVE-2025-42957) A critical vulnerability (CVE-2025-42957) in SAP S/4HANA enterprise resource planning software is being exploited by attackers “to a limited extent”, the Dutch National Cyber Security Center (NCSC NL) has warned on Friday. How gaming experience can help with a cybersecurity career Many people might not think that playing video games could help build a career in cybersecurity. Yet the skills gained through gaming, even if they don’t seem relevant at first, can be useful in the field. How to reclaim control over your online shopping data Online shopping is convenient, saves time, and everything is just a click away. But how often do we stop to think about what happens to the data we leave behind, or the risks that might come with it? Detecting danger: EASM in the modern security stack The challenge for security professionals isn’t just defeating threats, it’s finding your vulnerabilities in the first place. That’s where External Attack Surface Management (EASM) tools come in. September 2025 Patch Tuesday forecast: The CVE matrix The CVE has become not only the designator around which we organize and rally, but also the resolution of the CVE is the standard against which we are measured. What the GitGuardian secrets sprawl report reveals about leaked credentials In this Help Net Security video, Dwayne McDaniel, Senior Developer Advocate at GitGuardian, presents findings from The State of Secrets Sprawl 2025. Five habits of highly secure development teams In this Help Net Security video, Brendon Collins, Principal Consultant at Optiv, explores how organizations can embed security and privacy into the software development lifecycle (SDLC) from the very start. CyberFlex: Flexible Pen testing as a Service with EASM CyberFlex is an Outpost24 solution that combines the strengths of its Pen-testing-as-a-Service (PTaaS) and External Attack Surface Management (EASM) solutions. Customers benefit from continuous coverage of their entire attack application attack surface, while enjoying a flexible consumption model. Smart ways CISOs can do more with less In this Help Net Security video, Jill Knesek, CISO at BlackLine, shares practical strategies for CISOs navigating tighter budgets. From maximizing existing tools and vendor partnerships to leveraging AI and making smart investments, she offers actionable advice for maintaining strong security without overspending. GenAI is fueling smarter fraud, but broken teamwork is the real problem More than 80 percent of large U.S. companies were targeted by socially engineered fraud in the past year, according to Trustmi’s 2025 Socially Engineered Fraud & Risk Report. Nearly half of those organizations reported a direct financial loss, with many incidents costing more than $500,000. Cybersecurity signals: Connecting controls and incident outcomes There is constant pressure on security leaders to decide which controls deserve the most attention and budget. A new study offers evidence on which measures are most closely linked to lower breach risk and how organizations should think about deploying them. Boards are being told to rethink their role in cybersecurity A new report from Google Cloud’s Office of the CISO lays out three areas where board oversight is becoming especially important: ransomware, cyber-enabled fraud, and the intersection of innovation and cybersecurity. Complexity and AI put identity protection to the test Identity has become a core pillar of cybersecurity strategy. Remote work, cloud-first adoption, and distributed supply chains have moved identity from “a tactical IT consideration to a strategic pillar of cybersecurity,” according to Cisco Duo’s 2025 State of Identity Security report. Attackers are turning Salesforce trust into their biggest weapon Salesforce has become a major target for attackers in 2025, according to new WithSecure research into threats affecting customer relationship management (CRM) platforms. Cutting through CVE noise with real-world threat signals CISOs are dealing with an overload of vulnerability data. Each year brings tens of thousands of new CVEs, yet only a small fraction ever become weaponized. Teams often fall back on CVSS scores, which label thousands of flaws as “high” or “critical” but fail to show which ones actually matter. The result is wasted effort, long patch backlogs, and exploitable weaknesses left in production. New threat group uses custom tools to hijack search results ESET Research has identified a new threat group called GhostRedirector. In June 2025, this group broke into at least 65 Windows servers, mostly in Brazil, Thailand, Vietnam, and the United States. File security risks rise as insiders, malware, and AI challenges converge Breaches tied to file access are happening often, and the costs add up quickly. Many organizations have faced multiple file-related incidents over the last two years, with financial losses stretching into the millions. The fallout often includes stolen customer data, reduced productivity, and exposure of intellectual property. AIDEFEND: Free AI defense framework AIDEFEND (Artificial Intelligence Defense Framework) is an open knowledge base dedicated to AI security, providing defensive countermeasures and best practices to help security pros safeguard AI and machine learning systems. KillChainGraph: Researchers test machine learning framework for mapping attacker behavior A team of researchers from Frondeur Labs, DistributedApps.ai, and OWASP has developed a new machine learning framework designed to help defenders anticipate attacker behavior across the stages of the Cyber Kill Chain. The work explores how machine learning models can forecast adversary techniques and generate structured attack paths. Cybersecurity jobs available right now: September 2, 2025 We’ve scoured the market to bring you a selection of roles that span various skill levels within the cybersecurity field. Check out this weekly selection of cybersecurity jobs available right now.
helpnetsecurity.comSep 7, 2025extracted
Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, SpyCloud among the affected by Salesloft breach
Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, SpyCloud among the affected by Salesloft Drift breach In the wake of last week’s revelation of a breach at Salesloft by a group tracked by Google as UNC6395, several companies – including Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, PagerDuty, Tanium, and SpyCloud – have confirmed their Salesforce instances were accessed. The companies noted that attackers had only limited access to Salesforce databases, not to other systems or resources. They warned, however, that the stolen customer data could be used for convincing phishing and social engineering attacks. The Salesloft breach Salesloft is the company behind a popular sales engagement platform of the same name. The company’s Drift application – an AI chat agent – can be integrated with many third-party platforms and tools, including Salesforce. On August 26, Salesloft stated that from August 8 to August 18, 2025, attackers used compromised OAuth credentials to exfiltrate data from the Salesforce instances of customers that have set up the Drift-Saleforce integration. Several days later, the Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) confirmed that the compromise impacted other integrations, as well. “On August 28, 2025, our investigation confirmed that the actor also compromised OAuth tokens for the ‘Drift Email’ integration. On August 9, 2025, a threat actor used these tokens to access email from a very small number of Google Workspace accounts,” GTIG analysts shared. Astrix Security researchers have confirmed that the attackers used the Drift Email OAuth application for Google Workspace to exfiltrate emails and that – at least in one case – they tried to access S3 buckets whose names have been likely extracted from compromised Salesforce environments. Similarly, WideField threat researchers have observed suspicious log event activity across multiple customers using its security platform, pointing to attackers rifling through Salesforce databases and Gmail accounts. How UNC6395 accessed emails (Source: WideField) Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks and the other companies mentioned above are just some of the 700+ companies impacted by this breach. While the stolen customer information can be valuable, GTIG analysts say that the attackers were focused on searching for AWS access keys, passwords, and Snowflake-related access tokens, which can (and likely have been) further misused by the attackers. What to do if your organization is on the victims list? Salesloft has yet to reveal how the attackers managed to get their hands on the OAuth tokens they used, but the company has engaged cybersecurity experts from (Google’s) Mandiant and Coalition to help them investigate and remediate the compromise. “We are recommending that all Drift customers who manage their own Drift connections to third-party applications via API key, proactively revoke the existing key and reconnect using a new API key for these applications. This only relates to API key-based Drift integrations. OAuth applications are being handled directly by Salesloft,” the company said on August 27, and outlined the process for updating the API keys. Salesforce has, for the moment, disabled all integrations between Salesforce and Salesloft technologies, including the Drift app. “Disabling the connection is a precautionary measure to help safeguard customer environments while we continue to assess and address the situation. We recognize this change may cause disruption and will provide further updates as more information becomes available,” the company noted. Likewise, Google has disabled the integration functionality between Google Workspace and Salesloft Drift pending further investigation, and has advised organizations to “review all third-party integrations connected to their Drift instance, revoke and rotate credentials for those applications, and investigate all connected systems for signs of unauthorized access.” Google Mandiant incident responders have provided extensive advice on how organizations can investigate for compromise and scan for exposed secrets and hardcoded credentials. Astrix researchers have shared additional indicators of compromise and described AWS-specific activity to look out for. WideField threat analysts have provided guidance useful to both their customers and other affected organizations. UPDATE (September 4, 2025, 05:40 a.m. ET): Cloudflare, Tenable, Proofpoint and Rubrik have also been affected. Cloudflare has released a detailed post-mortem on what the attackers did when they accessed their Salesforce instance, as well as indicators of compromise. Subscribe to our breaking news e-mail alert to never miss out on the latest breaches, vulnerabilities and cybersecurity threats. Subscribe here!
helpnetsecurity.comSep 2, 2025extracted